重复经颅磁刺激的安全性和耐受性:超过1200个疗程的分析

I. Bakulin, A. Zabirova, A. Poydasheva, D. Lagoda, N. Suponeva, M. Piradov
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激的安全性和耐受性:超过1200个疗程的分析","authors":"I. Bakulin, A. Zabirova, A. Poydasheva, D. Lagoda, N. Suponeva, M. Piradov","doi":"10.14412/2074-2711-2023-3-35-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used in research and clinical practice, therefore, the issues of its safety and tolerability are especially important. Currently, serious adverse reactions (ARs) are extremely rare. The more common mild ARs that can develop during and after stimulation remain less well understood but may affect procedure tolerance and treatment adherence.Objective: to study the tolerability and safety of TMS in patients and healthy volunteers.Material and methods. In a retrospective cohort study using standardized questionnaires, ARs were assessed during and within 24 hours after TMS in patients (n=103) and healthy volunteers (n=74).Results. In total, the data of 1246 sessions were analyzed. ARs were observed during 56.8% of the analyzed sessions and within 24 hours after in 21.5% of the sessions. In most cases, they were mild and did not affect the intent to continue stimulation. TMS withdrawal due to ARs was reported in six cases (3.3% of participants), three of which experienced severe headache (HA) after stimulation. During stimulation, sleepiness (32.4%) and pain in the stimulation area (20.3%) were most often recorded. The most frequent AR within 24 hours after TMS was HA (13.3% of sessions), its characteristics are described and possible diagnostic criteria are proposed.Conclusion. ARs can occur during and after a TMS session and are mild in most cases. TMS-induced HA, which is the most common AR within 24 hours after TMS, can be considered a distinct type of secondary HA, the pathogenesis of which requires further study.","PeriodicalId":19252,"journal":{"name":"Neurology, neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: an analysis of over 1200 sessions\",\"authors\":\"I. Bakulin, A. Zabirova, A. Poydasheva, D. Lagoda, N. Suponeva, M. Piradov\",\"doi\":\"10.14412/2074-2711-2023-3-35-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used in research and clinical practice, therefore, the issues of its safety and tolerability are especially important. Currently, serious adverse reactions (ARs) are extremely rare. The more common mild ARs that can develop during and after stimulation remain less well understood but may affect procedure tolerance and treatment adherence.Objective: to study the tolerability and safety of TMS in patients and healthy volunteers.Material and methods. In a retrospective cohort study using standardized questionnaires, ARs were assessed during and within 24 hours after TMS in patients (n=103) and healthy volunteers (n=74).Results. In total, the data of 1246 sessions were analyzed. ARs were observed during 56.8% of the analyzed sessions and within 24 hours after in 21.5% of the sessions. In most cases, they were mild and did not affect the intent to continue stimulation. TMS withdrawal due to ARs was reported in six cases (3.3% of participants), three of which experienced severe headache (HA) after stimulation. During stimulation, sleepiness (32.4%) and pain in the stimulation area (20.3%) were most often recorded. The most frequent AR within 24 hours after TMS was HA (13.3% of sessions), its characteristics are described and possible diagnostic criteria are proposed.Conclusion. ARs can occur during and after a TMS session and are mild in most cases. TMS-induced HA, which is the most common AR within 24 hours after TMS, can be considered a distinct type of secondary HA, the pathogenesis of which requires further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology, neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology, neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2023-3-35-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology, neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2023-3-35-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅磁刺激(TMS)越来越多地应用于研究和临床实践,因此其安全性和耐受性问题尤为重要。目前,严重不良反应(ARs)极为罕见。在刺激期间和刺激后可能发生的更常见的轻度急性心肌梗死尚不清楚,但可能影响手术耐受性和治疗依从性。目的:研究经颅磁刺激对患者和健康志愿者的耐受性和安全性。材料和方法。在一项采用标准化问卷的回顾性队列研究中,对103名患者(n=103)和74名健康志愿者(n=74)在经颅磁刺激期间和后24小时内的ar进行了评估。总共分析了1246个会话的数据。在56.8%的分析过程中观察到ar,在21.5%的分析过程后24小时内观察到ar。在大多数情况下,它们是轻微的,不影响继续刺激的意图。有6例(3.3%的参与者)报告了由于ARs引起的经颅磁刺激戒断,其中3例在刺激后出现严重头痛(HA)。在刺激过程中,最常见的是嗜睡(32.4%)和刺激区疼痛(20.3%)。经颅磁刺激后24小时内最常见的AR是HA(13.3%),描述了其特征并提出了可能的诊断标准。ar可在经颅磁刺激期间和之后发生,大多数情况下是轻微的。经颅磁刺激诱导的HA是经颅磁刺激后24小时内最常见的AR,可以认为是一种不同类型的继发性HA,其发病机制有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: an analysis of over 1200 sessions
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used in research and clinical practice, therefore, the issues of its safety and tolerability are especially important. Currently, serious adverse reactions (ARs) are extremely rare. The more common mild ARs that can develop during and after stimulation remain less well understood but may affect procedure tolerance and treatment adherence.Objective: to study the tolerability and safety of TMS in patients and healthy volunteers.Material and methods. In a retrospective cohort study using standardized questionnaires, ARs were assessed during and within 24 hours after TMS in patients (n=103) and healthy volunteers (n=74).Results. In total, the data of 1246 sessions were analyzed. ARs were observed during 56.8% of the analyzed sessions and within 24 hours after in 21.5% of the sessions. In most cases, they were mild and did not affect the intent to continue stimulation. TMS withdrawal due to ARs was reported in six cases (3.3% of participants), three of which experienced severe headache (HA) after stimulation. During stimulation, sleepiness (32.4%) and pain in the stimulation area (20.3%) were most often recorded. The most frequent AR within 24 hours after TMS was HA (13.3% of sessions), its characteristics are described and possible diagnostic criteria are proposed.Conclusion. ARs can occur during and after a TMS session and are mild in most cases. TMS-induced HA, which is the most common AR within 24 hours after TMS, can be considered a distinct type of secondary HA, the pathogenesis of which requires further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute cerebrovascular accidents in patients with new coronavirus infection COVID-19 Clinical case of an atypical course of autoimmune anti-NMDA encephalitis Neuropsychological assessment of the morphofunctional organization of humour perception processes Vestibular rehabilitation in complex therapy of vestibular vertigo (consensus of experts) Assessment of spasticity-related pain in cerebral palsy and the efficacy of its treatment with incobotulinumtoxin A (literature review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1