在心理学-法律实践和研究中使用远程心理学的建议:美国心理学-法律协会声明》(美国心理学-法律协会第 41 分部)。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychology Public Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1037/law0000394
Ashley B Batastini, Michelle R Guyton, Paula A Bernhard, Johanna B Folk, Sean B Knuth, Eileen A Kohutis, Alexandra Lugo, Michael L Stanfill, Chriscelyn M Tussey
{"title":"在心理学-法律实践和研究中使用远程心理学的建议:美国心理学-法律协会声明》(美国心理学-法律协会第 41 分部)。","authors":"Ashley B Batastini, Michelle R Guyton, Paula A Bernhard, Johanna B Folk, Sean B Knuth, Eileen A Kohutis, Alexandra Lugo, Michael L Stanfill, Chriscelyn M Tussey","doi":"10.1037/law0000394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent impact on psychological work, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association convened a taskforce to provide guidance to its membership regarding the use of technology for practice and research at the intersection of psychology and law. Drawing from existing research in psychology-law and beyond, as well as the first-hand experience of taskforce members, this document outlines foundational guidance to apply technology to forensic and correctional work while acknowledging these settings provide unique challenges to ethical practice. The recommendations provide support for psychologists involved in assessment, treatment, training, and research. However, these recommendations may not exhaustively apply to all areas of psycholegal practice or all forms of technology. Further, these recommendations are intended to be consulted in conjunction with other professional practice guidelines, emerging research, and policy changes that impact the integration of technologies into this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51463,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10880951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for the Use of Telepsychology in Psychology-Law Practice and Research: A Statement by American Psychology-Law Society (APA Division 41).\",\"authors\":\"Ashley B Batastini, Michelle R Guyton, Paula A Bernhard, Johanna B Folk, Sean B Knuth, Eileen A Kohutis, Alexandra Lugo, Michael L Stanfill, Chriscelyn M Tussey\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/law0000394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent impact on psychological work, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association convened a taskforce to provide guidance to its membership regarding the use of technology for practice and research at the intersection of psychology and law. Drawing from existing research in psychology-law and beyond, as well as the first-hand experience of taskforce members, this document outlines foundational guidance to apply technology to forensic and correctional work while acknowledging these settings provide unique challenges to ethical practice. The recommendations provide support for psychologists involved in assessment, treatment, training, and research. However, these recommendations may not exhaustively apply to all areas of psycholegal practice or all forms of technology. Further, these recommendations are intended to be consulted in conjunction with other professional practice guidelines, emerging research, and policy changes that impact the integration of technologies into this work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Public Policy and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10880951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Public Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了应对 COVID-19 大流行以及随后对心理工作的影响,美国心理学会第 41 分会召集了一个特别工作组,为其成员提供有关在心理学与法律交叉领域的实践和研究中使用技术的指导。本文件借鉴了心理学-法律及其他领域的现有研究,以及工作组成员的第一手经验,概述了将技术应用于法医和惩教工作的基本指导,同时也承认这些环境为道德实践带来了独特的挑战。这些建议为参与评估、治疗、培训和研究的心理学家提供了支持。但是,这些建议可能并不完全适用于所有的心理法律实践领域或所有形式的技术。此外,在参考这些建议的同时,还应参考其他专业实践指南、新出现的研究以及影响将技术融入这项工作的政策变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for the Use of Telepsychology in Psychology-Law Practice and Research: A Statement by American Psychology-Law Society (APA Division 41).

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent impact on psychological work, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association convened a taskforce to provide guidance to its membership regarding the use of technology for practice and research at the intersection of psychology and law. Drawing from existing research in psychology-law and beyond, as well as the first-hand experience of taskforce members, this document outlines foundational guidance to apply technology to forensic and correctional work while acknowledging these settings provide unique challenges to ethical practice. The recommendations provide support for psychologists involved in assessment, treatment, training, and research. However, these recommendations may not exhaustively apply to all areas of psycholegal practice or all forms of technology. Further, these recommendations are intended to be consulted in conjunction with other professional practice guidelines, emerging research, and policy changes that impact the integration of technologies into this work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law ® provides a forum in which to critically evaluate the contributions of psychology and related disciplines (hereinafter psychology) to public policy and legal issues, and vice versa. It is read by legal scholars and professionals and public policy analysts as well as psychology researchers and practitioners working at the interface of the three fields. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical articles that critically evaluate the contributions and potential contributions of psychology to public policy and legal issues;assess the desirability of different public policy and legal alternatives in light of the scientific knowledge base in psychology;articulate research needs that address public policy and legal issues for which there is currently insufficient theoretical and empirical knowledge;present empirical work that makes a significant contribution to the application of psychological knowledge to public policy or the law; andexamine public policy and legal issues relating to the conduct of psychology and related disciplines (e.g., human subjects, protection policies; informed consent procedures).
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Factors Contributing to the Delayed Submission of Competence to Stand Trial Reports and the Jail-Based Competency Crisis in Washington Factors contributing to the delayed submission of competence to stand trial reports and the jail-based competency crisis in Washington. Crowd reactions to the police use of force at the 2017 Phoenix Trump rally. Supplemental Material for Adult Male Rape Myths in England Since 1994: A Systemic Mixed Methods Review Deaf community experiences in the Canadian justice system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1