木屑和水稻秸秆覆盖条控制滑坡道径流和泥沙产量的有效性

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Forest Science Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1093/forsci/fxad023
A. Solgi, A. Cerdà, Ali Masumian, M. Rabiee, F. Behjou, Razieh Ghasemi Vojoodi
{"title":"木屑和水稻秸秆覆盖条控制滑坡道径流和泥沙产量的有效性","authors":"A. Solgi, A. Cerdà, Ali Masumian, M. Rabiee, F. Behjou, Razieh Ghasemi Vojoodi","doi":"10.1093/forsci/fxad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mulches can be effective for reducing sediment loss and erosion from forest harvesting activities. This study evaluates the use of rice straw and sawdust as mulch covers for skid trails on clay loam soil. The treatments with three replications each included combinations of two levels of slope gradient (≤ 20% and > 20%), three types of mulch cover (bare soil, sawdust, and rice straw cover), three levels of mulching application schemes (1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 of the plot length), and two levels of surface cover rates (50% and 70%). Increasing levels of mulch cover had significantly lower runoff and sediment yields throughout the trails. The average runoff rates and sediment yield from the machine operating trails treated with sawdust cover (SC) (30.2 l and 2.7 g m-2) were lower than on trails covered with rice straw mulch (RSC) (36.8 l and 3.5 g m-2), which were, in turn, lower than on untreated bare soil (BS) trail sectors (48.80 l and 5.34 g m-2). Overall, mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length than over the 1/3 and 2/3 plots length strips, both in terms of runoff and sediment yield.\n Study Implications: We found that soil loss depended strongly on the slope gradient. Mulch cover had a significant improvement effect on the surface runoff and sediment yield, and mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length.","PeriodicalId":12749,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Sawdust and Rice Straw Mulch Strips to Control Runoff and Sediment Yield in Skid Trails\",\"authors\":\"A. Solgi, A. Cerdà, Ali Masumian, M. Rabiee, F. Behjou, Razieh Ghasemi Vojoodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forsci/fxad023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mulches can be effective for reducing sediment loss and erosion from forest harvesting activities. This study evaluates the use of rice straw and sawdust as mulch covers for skid trails on clay loam soil. The treatments with three replications each included combinations of two levels of slope gradient (≤ 20% and > 20%), three types of mulch cover (bare soil, sawdust, and rice straw cover), three levels of mulching application schemes (1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 of the plot length), and two levels of surface cover rates (50% and 70%). Increasing levels of mulch cover had significantly lower runoff and sediment yields throughout the trails. The average runoff rates and sediment yield from the machine operating trails treated with sawdust cover (SC) (30.2 l and 2.7 g m-2) were lower than on trails covered with rice straw mulch (RSC) (36.8 l and 3.5 g m-2), which were, in turn, lower than on untreated bare soil (BS) trail sectors (48.80 l and 5.34 g m-2). Overall, mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length than over the 1/3 and 2/3 plots length strips, both in terms of runoff and sediment yield.\\n Study Implications: We found that soil loss depended strongly on the slope gradient. Mulch cover had a significant improvement effect on the surface runoff and sediment yield, and mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

覆盖物可以有效地减少森林采伐活动造成的沉积物损失和侵蚀。本研究评价了在粘壤土上使用稻草和锯末作为地膜覆盖滑痕的效果。3个重复处理包括2级坡度(≤20%和> 20%)、3种覆盖类型(裸土、木屑和稻草覆盖)、3级覆盖方案(地长1/3、2/3和3/3)和2级地表覆盖率(50%和70%)的组合。增加地膜覆盖水平显著降低了整个小径的径流和沉积物产量。锯末覆盖(SC)处理的机器运行路径的平均径流量和产沙量(30.2 l和2.7 g m-2)低于覆盖水稻秸秆(RSC)的路径(36.8 l和3.5 g m-2),而未处理的裸土(BS)路径部分(48.80 l和5.34 g m-2)。总体而言,在整个地块长度上覆盖比在1/3和2/3地块长度上覆盖更有效,无论是径流量还是产沙量。研究意义:土壤流失量与坡地坡度密切相关。地膜覆盖对地表径流和产沙量有显著的改善作用,且覆盖整个地块时效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Sawdust and Rice Straw Mulch Strips to Control Runoff and Sediment Yield in Skid Trails
Mulches can be effective for reducing sediment loss and erosion from forest harvesting activities. This study evaluates the use of rice straw and sawdust as mulch covers for skid trails on clay loam soil. The treatments with three replications each included combinations of two levels of slope gradient (≤ 20% and > 20%), three types of mulch cover (bare soil, sawdust, and rice straw cover), three levels of mulching application schemes (1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 of the plot length), and two levels of surface cover rates (50% and 70%). Increasing levels of mulch cover had significantly lower runoff and sediment yields throughout the trails. The average runoff rates and sediment yield from the machine operating trails treated with sawdust cover (SC) (30.2 l and 2.7 g m-2) were lower than on trails covered with rice straw mulch (RSC) (36.8 l and 3.5 g m-2), which were, in turn, lower than on untreated bare soil (BS) trail sectors (48.80 l and 5.34 g m-2). Overall, mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length than over the 1/3 and 2/3 plots length strips, both in terms of runoff and sediment yield. Study Implications: We found that soil loss depended strongly on the slope gradient. Mulch cover had a significant improvement effect on the surface runoff and sediment yield, and mulching was more effective when applied over the entire plot length.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Science
Forest Science 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management. Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Selective Postplanting Forb Control Increased Growth of Douglas-Fir but Not Western Larch Seedlings in Idaho Accuracy of Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Identification by Forest Inventory and Analysis Field Crews Applying Ratio-of-Means Estimation for Annualized Components of Volume Change in Forest Resource Monitoring Genetic Variability for Clonal Propagation of Acacia mearnsii Cointegration of Timberland Value in the United States, South and Central America, and Oceania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1