S. Endayani, Andrew Stefano, Fathiah, Purbawati, I. Rosanti
{"title":"使用quickbird监测森林面积变化","authors":"S. Endayani, Andrew Stefano, Fathiah, Purbawati, I. Rosanti","doi":"10.11598/btb.2022.29.2.1690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted to compare the urban forest management in three urban forests in Samarinda City. The application of GIS (Geographic Information System) is one of the alternatives to conduct a variety of processes such as: providing geographical information system, identifying the areas of urban forests in Samarinda, helping to plan the process of map digitalization and performing overlay process. The main method used for the data analysis process on the map was the overlay process data analysis technique. The research findings showed that: 1) the appointment of urban forests as the initial step of urban forest development needed more implementation from the government; 2) the urban forest determination needed more socialization to the owner of the urban forest and the public in 1992 and 2019; 3) the urban forests needed more management. There were some similarities and differences in the management of urban forests in the three study locations. The similarities among the three locations were that the three locations had already met the minimum standards of one urban forest location even though there was still one location outside of these three locations which did not meet the minimum standard. The differences were in managing the urban forests. These differences indicated that the urban forest policy was not fully implemented in Samarinda City.","PeriodicalId":38783,"journal":{"name":"Biotropia","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MONITORING FOREST AREA CHANGE USING QUICKBIRD\",\"authors\":\"S. Endayani, Andrew Stefano, Fathiah, Purbawati, I. Rosanti\",\"doi\":\"10.11598/btb.2022.29.2.1690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study was conducted to compare the urban forest management in three urban forests in Samarinda City. The application of GIS (Geographic Information System) is one of the alternatives to conduct a variety of processes such as: providing geographical information system, identifying the areas of urban forests in Samarinda, helping to plan the process of map digitalization and performing overlay process. The main method used for the data analysis process on the map was the overlay process data analysis technique. The research findings showed that: 1) the appointment of urban forests as the initial step of urban forest development needed more implementation from the government; 2) the urban forest determination needed more socialization to the owner of the urban forest and the public in 1992 and 2019; 3) the urban forests needed more management. There were some similarities and differences in the management of urban forests in the three study locations. The similarities among the three locations were that the three locations had already met the minimum standards of one urban forest location even though there was still one location outside of these three locations which did not meet the minimum standard. The differences were in managing the urban forests. These differences indicated that the urban forest policy was not fully implemented in Samarinda City.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropia\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11598/btb.2022.29.2.1690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11598/btb.2022.29.2.1690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
对萨马林达市3个城市森林的城市森林管理进行了比较研究。GIS (Geographic Information System)的应用是提供地理信息系统、确定萨马林达城市森林区域、帮助规划地图数字化过程和进行覆盖过程等多种过程的替代方案之一。在地图上进行数据分析的主要方法是叠加过程数据分析技术。研究结果表明:1)城市森林作为城市森林发展的第一步,需要政府更多的实施;(2) 1992年和2019年城市森林的确定需要对城市森林所有者和公众进行更多的社会化;3)城市森林需要加强管理。三个研究地点的城市森林管理存在一定的相似性和差异性。这三个地点的相似之处在于,这三个地点已经达到了一个城市森林地点的最低标准,尽管在这三个地点之外还有一个地点没有达到最低标准。不同之处在于对城市森林的管理。这些差异表明城市森林政策在萨马林达市没有得到充分执行。
A study was conducted to compare the urban forest management in three urban forests in Samarinda City. The application of GIS (Geographic Information System) is one of the alternatives to conduct a variety of processes such as: providing geographical information system, identifying the areas of urban forests in Samarinda, helping to plan the process of map digitalization and performing overlay process. The main method used for the data analysis process on the map was the overlay process data analysis technique. The research findings showed that: 1) the appointment of urban forests as the initial step of urban forest development needed more implementation from the government; 2) the urban forest determination needed more socialization to the owner of the urban forest and the public in 1992 and 2019; 3) the urban forests needed more management. There were some similarities and differences in the management of urban forests in the three study locations. The similarities among the three locations were that the three locations had already met the minimum standards of one urban forest location even though there was still one location outside of these three locations which did not meet the minimum standard. The differences were in managing the urban forests. These differences indicated that the urban forest policy was not fully implemented in Samarinda City.