评估云服务单变量时间序列数据中基于实例的跨域异常检测的特征表示

Rahul Agrahari, Matthew Nicholson, Clare Conran, H. Assem, John D. Kelleher
{"title":"评估云服务单变量时间序列数据中基于实例的跨域异常检测的特征表示","authors":"Rahul Agrahari, Matthew Nicholson, Clare Conran, H. Assem, John D. Kelleher","doi":"10.3390/iot3010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare and assess the efficacy of a number of time-series instance feature representations for anomaly detection. To assess whether there are statistically significant differences between different feature representations for anomaly detection in a time series, we calculate and compare confidence intervals on the average performance of different feature sets across a number of different model types and cross-domain time-series datasets. Our results indicate that the catch22 time-series feature set augmented with features based on rolling mean and variance performs best on average, and that the difference in performance between this feature set and the next best feature set is statistically significant. Furthermore, our analysis of the features used by the most successful model indicates that features related to mean and variance are the most informative for anomaly detection. We also find that features based on model forecast errors are useful for anomaly detection for some but not all datasets.","PeriodicalId":6745,"journal":{"name":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Feature Representations for Instance-Based Cross-Domain Anomaly Detection in Cloud Services Univariate Time Series Data\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Agrahari, Matthew Nicholson, Clare Conran, H. Assem, John D. Kelleher\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/iot3010008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare and assess the efficacy of a number of time-series instance feature representations for anomaly detection. To assess whether there are statistically significant differences between different feature representations for anomaly detection in a time series, we calculate and compare confidence intervals on the average performance of different feature sets across a number of different model types and cross-domain time-series datasets. Our results indicate that the catch22 time-series feature set augmented with features based on rolling mean and variance performs best on average, and that the difference in performance between this feature set and the next best feature set is statistically significant. Furthermore, our analysis of the features used by the most successful model indicates that features related to mean and variance are the most informative for anomaly detection. We also find that features based on model forecast errors are useful for anomaly detection for some but not all datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3010008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们比较和评估了一些时间序列实例特征表示用于异常检测的有效性。为了评估在时间序列中不同的异常检测特征表示之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异,我们计算并比较了不同特征集在许多不同模型类型和跨域时间序列数据集上的平均性能的置信区间。我们的研究结果表明,基于滚动均值和方差的特征增强的catch22时间序列特征集的平均性能最好,并且该特征集与下一个最佳特征集之间的性能差异具有统计学意义。此外,我们对最成功的模型所使用的特征进行了分析,表明与均值和方差相关的特征对于异常检测的信息量最大。我们还发现,基于模型预测误差的特征对于某些但不是所有数据集的异常检测是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Feature Representations for Instance-Based Cross-Domain Anomaly Detection in Cloud Services Univariate Time Series Data
In this paper, we compare and assess the efficacy of a number of time-series instance feature representations for anomaly detection. To assess whether there are statistically significant differences between different feature representations for anomaly detection in a time series, we calculate and compare confidence intervals on the average performance of different feature sets across a number of different model types and cross-domain time-series datasets. Our results indicate that the catch22 time-series feature set augmented with features based on rolling mean and variance performs best on average, and that the difference in performance between this feature set and the next best feature set is statistically significant. Furthermore, our analysis of the features used by the most successful model indicates that features related to mean and variance are the most informative for anomaly detection. We also find that features based on model forecast errors are useful for anomaly detection for some but not all datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Constraint-Aware Federated Scheduling for Data Center Workloads A Novel Internet of Things-Based System for Ten-Pin Bowling Internet-of-Things Edge Computing Systems for Streaming Video Analytics: Trails Behind and the Paths Ahead IoT-Applicable Generalized Frameproof Combinatorial Designs Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet of Intelligence of Things in Higher Education—Towards Bridging Theory and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1