探讨元话语在政治观点写作中的性别差异

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356
Nur Syahira Ramash, Lay Shi Ng
{"title":"探讨元话语在政治观点写作中的性别差异","authors":"Nur Syahira Ramash, Lay Shi Ng","doi":"10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers. Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men. However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles. Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers. \n  \nMethodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers. 100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times. \n  \nFindings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists. Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists. \n  \nContributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers. \n  \nKeywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles. \n  \nCite as: Ramash, N. S., & Ng, L. S. (2023). Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356","PeriodicalId":16687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPLORING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN USING METADISCOURSE FOR POLITICAL OPINION WRITING\",\"authors\":\"Nur Syahira Ramash, Lay Shi Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers. Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men. However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles. Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers. \\n  \\nMethodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers. 100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times. \\n  \\nFindings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists. Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists. \\n  \\nContributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers. \\n  \\nKeywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles. \\n  \\nCite as: Ramash, N. S., & Ng, L. S. (2023). Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356\",\"PeriodicalId\":16687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:元话语标记语是说服性写作中最常用的语言手段之一,它根据目标读者的需要和期望来塑造作者的论点。研究一致表明,平均而言,女性对政治的兴趣、知情程度和效率都不如男性。然而,这并不意味着男性专栏作家在撰写政治观点文章时比女性专栏作家更有说服力。因此,本研究旨在探讨男性和女性专栏作家如何在政治观点写作中使用元话语标记来有效地将他们的政治观点导向读者。方法:本描述性研究采用频率分析、比较分析和对8位热心读者的半结构化访谈来研究男性和女性专栏作家在其政治观点文章中使用的元话语标记,以及说服对读者的影响。马来西亚《星报》和《新海峡时报》两家英文门户网站选出了100篇关于马来西亚第14届大选的评论文章。研究发现:女性专栏作家比男性专栏作家使用更多的元话语标记。受访者得出的结论是,在文本中使用更多元话语标记的文章,特别是在人际范畴中,似乎更有说服力。此外,研究结果表明,女性专栏作家比男性专栏作家呈现出更令人信服的形象。贡献:由于对政治写作中性别差异的研究仍然很少,本研究提供了关于在政治观点文章中使用元话语标记的性别偏好的信息。本研究通过向研究人员和观点作者提供关于可用于建立作者和读者之间关系的多种元话语标记的信息,为知识体系做出了贡献。关键词:元话语标记,说服性写作,性别,男性,女性,政论文章。引自:Ramash, n.s., & Ng, l.s.(2023)。探讨元话语在政治观点写作中的性别差异。中国农业科学学报,28(1),333-356。http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPLORING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN USING METADISCOURSE FOR POLITICAL OPINION WRITING
Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers. Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men. However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles. Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers.   Methodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers. 100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times.   Findings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists. Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists.   Contributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers.   Keywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles.   Cite as: Ramash, N. S., & Ng, L. S. (2023). Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
“GREETINGS FROM HELL (NERAKA KIRIM SALAM)”: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS-BASED CYBERBULLYING OF DEHIJABIS IMPLEMENTING MONETARY POLICY WITH APPLICATION OF SUKUK: CHALLENGES AND POLICY DIRECTIONS CHALLENGES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN IMPLEMENTING GAMIFICATION APPROACH AMONG VOCATIONAL COLLEGE LECTURERS IN MALAYSIA THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT HEURISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGE CURRICULUM OF SUCCESSFUL COUNTRIES IN PISA AND TURKEY BY USING ANFIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1