从边缘到中心:欧洲边境的矛盾心理

S. Koch
{"title":"从边缘到中心:欧洲边境的矛盾心理","authors":"S. Koch","doi":"10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.263538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the consideration of conceptual approaches to the analysis of the internal political spaces of Europe, which have acquired characteristic features of the border and peripheral systems. The reasons and conditions of the conceptual reinterpretation of the concepts of \"periphery\" and \"center\" under the conditions of variable border systems are traced using the example of the Western European and Eastern European borders. An analysis of the most pragmatic theories of border development applied to European border landscapes is offered. The main attention is paid to three models: 1) the Western European border landscape, which was formed between imperial centers due to the creation of a network socio-economic trade system, providing a spatial border with buffer political organizations, within which small, economically, and politically effective states of the offshore type function; 2) the Eastern European border landscape, which was formed within the borders of the Three Seas, between the centers of continental empires, which marginalized the border space, turning it into a competitive multicultural buffer zone; 3) models of the space of Europe within the European Union, which is formed as a network institutionalized socio-cultural system, where the process of abandoning universal territorial and political systems in favor of post-national ones, capable of taking into account the plurality of individual and collective identities, is gradually taking place. The focus is on the problem of the transformation of the peripheral spaces of the EU, which are interpreted within the framework of two approaches: 1) as an expansionist political strategy of \"enlargement\" of the Union, which is implemented due to the standardization of institutions and norms, and the integration of peripheral territorial-political and local actors takes place within \"neighborhood policies\"; 2) as a wide use of frontier discourse in relation to the project of expanding the political and geographical space of Europe. The intermediate border spaces are transformed into a system of cross-border interaction, which determines the movement of the borders of macro-regions.","PeriodicalId":38327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FROM THE PERIPHERY TO THE CENTRE: THE AMBIVALENCE OF THE EUROPEAN BORDERLAND\",\"authors\":\"S. Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.263538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the consideration of conceptual approaches to the analysis of the internal political spaces of Europe, which have acquired characteristic features of the border and peripheral systems. The reasons and conditions of the conceptual reinterpretation of the concepts of \\\"periphery\\\" and \\\"center\\\" under the conditions of variable border systems are traced using the example of the Western European and Eastern European borders. An analysis of the most pragmatic theories of border development applied to European border landscapes is offered. The main attention is paid to three models: 1) the Western European border landscape, which was formed between imperial centers due to the creation of a network socio-economic trade system, providing a spatial border with buffer political organizations, within which small, economically, and politically effective states of the offshore type function; 2) the Eastern European border landscape, which was formed within the borders of the Three Seas, between the centers of continental empires, which marginalized the border space, turning it into a competitive multicultural buffer zone; 3) models of the space of Europe within the European Union, which is formed as a network institutionalized socio-cultural system, where the process of abandoning universal territorial and political systems in favor of post-national ones, capable of taking into account the plurality of individual and collective identities, is gradually taking place. The focus is on the problem of the transformation of the peripheral spaces of the EU, which are interpreted within the framework of two approaches: 1) as an expansionist political strategy of \\\"enlargement\\\" of the Union, which is implemented due to the standardization of institutions and norms, and the integration of peripheral territorial-political and local actors takes place within \\\"neighborhood policies\\\"; 2) as a wide use of frontier discourse in relation to the project of expanding the political and geographical space of Europe. The intermediate border spaces are transformed into a system of cross-border interaction, which determines the movement of the borders of macro-regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.263538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.263538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于考虑对欧洲内部政治空间进行分析的概念方法,这些空间已经获得了边界和外围系统的特征。以西欧和东欧边界为例,追溯了在可变边界制度条件下对“外围”和“中心”概念进行概念性重新解释的原因和条件。对应用于欧洲边境景观的最实用的边境发展理论进行了分析。主要关注三种模式:1)西欧边境景观,由于网络社会经济贸易体系的建立,在帝国中心之间形成,提供了一个具有缓冲政治组织的空间边界,在这个空间边界内,小型的,经济上和政治上有效的离岸型国家发挥作用;(2)在三海边界内,在大陆帝国中心之间形成的东欧边界景观,使边界空间边缘化,使其成为一个竞争性的多元文化缓冲区;3)欧盟内部的欧洲空间模式,它是作为一个制度化的社会文化体系形成的网络,在这个体系中,放弃普遍的领土和政治体系,转而支持能够考虑到个人和集体身份多元性的后国家体系的过程正在逐渐发生。重点是欧盟周边空间的转型问题,这在两种途径的框架内被解释为:1)欧盟“扩大”的扩张主义政治战略,这是由于制度和规范的标准化而实施的,外围领土政治和地方行动者的整合是在“邻里政策”中进行的;2)在扩大欧洲政治和地理空间的计划中广泛使用边疆话语。中间边界空间转化为跨界互动系统,决定了宏观区域边界的运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FROM THE PERIPHERY TO THE CENTRE: THE AMBIVALENCE OF THE EUROPEAN BORDERLAND
The article is devoted to the consideration of conceptual approaches to the analysis of the internal political spaces of Europe, which have acquired characteristic features of the border and peripheral systems. The reasons and conditions of the conceptual reinterpretation of the concepts of "periphery" and "center" under the conditions of variable border systems are traced using the example of the Western European and Eastern European borders. An analysis of the most pragmatic theories of border development applied to European border landscapes is offered. The main attention is paid to three models: 1) the Western European border landscape, which was formed between imperial centers due to the creation of a network socio-economic trade system, providing a spatial border with buffer political organizations, within which small, economically, and politically effective states of the offshore type function; 2) the Eastern European border landscape, which was formed within the borders of the Three Seas, between the centers of continental empires, which marginalized the border space, turning it into a competitive multicultural buffer zone; 3) models of the space of Europe within the European Union, which is formed as a network institutionalized socio-cultural system, where the process of abandoning universal territorial and political systems in favor of post-national ones, capable of taking into account the plurality of individual and collective identities, is gradually taking place. The focus is on the problem of the transformation of the peripheral spaces of the EU, which are interpreted within the framework of two approaches: 1) as an expansionist political strategy of "enlargement" of the Union, which is implemented due to the standardization of institutions and norms, and the integration of peripheral territorial-political and local actors takes place within "neighborhood policies"; 2) as a wide use of frontier discourse in relation to the project of expanding the political and geographical space of Europe. The intermediate border spaces are transformed into a system of cross-border interaction, which determines the movement of the borders of macro-regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politikayı Yeniden Düşünmenin Bir İmkânı Olarak Jacques Rancière’de Politik Özneleşme Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Afet Yönetimindeki Rolü: 6 Şubat Depremi Hatay Örneği Türkiye İşçi Partisi’nin İnşa ve Gelişimini Tetikleyen Koşullar (1960 – 1966) Adil Düzen Kavramı Bağlamında Necmettin Erbakan’ın Dış Politika Anlayışı Alimcan Ablet, Çin-İsrail İlişkileri, İstanbul: İyidüşün Yayınları, (Mayıs 2021), ss. 208.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1