一个新的开始:青少年记录在大学录取中的不断发展

E. Rips
{"title":"一个新的开始:青少年记录在大学录取中的不断发展","authors":"E. Rips","doi":"10.36646/MJLR.54.1.FRESH","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions about criminal and juvenile records in the college application process are common and frequently fail to account for the unique characteristics of juvenile justice systems. The ways in which colleges and universities ask about juvenile records often encourage applicants to disclose information in spite of statutory protections. These questions fly in the face of the public policy underlying a range of legal safeguards that are intended to help individuals with records from juvenile systems in moving forward and receiving a second chance. In recent years, a series of legislative and institutional changes have begun to restrict how colleges and universities may ask about criminal and juvenile records. Four states have passed laws limiting how criminal history may be used in the admissions process. The Common Application has moved to make asking about criminal history optional, and now gives institutions more flexibility in deciding how to phrase criminal history questions. This Article presents a first-of-its-kind empirical analysis of how the more than 800 U.S. schools that use the Common Application, and schools in the first states to restrict asking about criminal history, have responded to these changes. While these reforms have affected how frequently colleges and universities ask about criminal history, they continue to leave the door open for some postsecondary institutions to push applicants to disclose juvenile records. The growing movement to restrict use of criminal history in the college admissions process presents a critical opportunity to reconsider the role that postsecondary systems should play in supporting the rehabilitative goals of juvenile justice systems. To that end, this Article concludes by providing recommendations for legislative and institutional language that can more effectively ensure that individuals with juvenile records are given a true second chance and a meaningful opportunity to earn postsecondary degrees.","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"65 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fresh Start: The Evolving Use of Juvenile Records in College Admissions\",\"authors\":\"E. Rips\",\"doi\":\"10.36646/MJLR.54.1.FRESH\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Questions about criminal and juvenile records in the college application process are common and frequently fail to account for the unique characteristics of juvenile justice systems. The ways in which colleges and universities ask about juvenile records often encourage applicants to disclose information in spite of statutory protections. These questions fly in the face of the public policy underlying a range of legal safeguards that are intended to help individuals with records from juvenile systems in moving forward and receiving a second chance. In recent years, a series of legislative and institutional changes have begun to restrict how colleges and universities may ask about criminal and juvenile records. Four states have passed laws limiting how criminal history may be used in the admissions process. The Common Application has moved to make asking about criminal history optional, and now gives institutions more flexibility in deciding how to phrase criminal history questions. This Article presents a first-of-its-kind empirical analysis of how the more than 800 U.S. schools that use the Common Application, and schools in the first states to restrict asking about criminal history, have responded to these changes. While these reforms have affected how frequently colleges and universities ask about criminal history, they continue to leave the door open for some postsecondary institutions to push applicants to disclose juvenile records. The growing movement to restrict use of criminal history in the college admissions process presents a critical opportunity to reconsider the role that postsecondary systems should play in supporting the rehabilitative goals of juvenile justice systems. To that end, this Article concludes by providing recommendations for legislative and institutional language that can more effectively ensure that individuals with juvenile records are given a true second chance and a meaningful opportunity to earn postsecondary degrees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School\",\"volume\":\"65 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36646/MJLR.54.1.FRESH\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/MJLR.54.1.FRESH","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大学申请过程中,有关犯罪和青少年记录的问题很常见,但往往无法解释青少年司法系统的独特特征。学院和大学询问青少年记录的方式常常鼓励申请人不顾法律保护而披露信息。这些问题与一系列法律保障措施背后的公共政策背道而驰,这些法律保障措施旨在帮助有少年系统记录的个人向前迈进,获得第二次机会。近年来,一系列的立法和制度变化已经开始限制高校询问犯罪和青少年记录的方式。四个州已经通过法律,限制在录取过程中如何使用犯罪记录。通用申请已经将询问犯罪历史变为可选选项,并且现在在决定如何表达犯罪历史问题方面给予机构更大的灵活性。本文首次对800多所使用通用申请的美国学校以及首批限制询问犯罪历史的州的学校如何应对这些变化进行了实证分析。虽然这些改革影响了高校询问犯罪记录的频率,但它们仍然为一些高等教育机构迫使申请人披露青少年记录敞开了大门。限制在大学录取过程中使用犯罪历史的运动日益增长,这为重新考虑高等教育系统在支持少年司法系统的改造目标方面应该发挥的作用提供了一个关键的机会。为此,本文最后为立法和制度语言提供建议,以更有效地确保有青少年记录的个人获得真正的第二次机会和有意义的获得高等教育学位的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Fresh Start: The Evolving Use of Juvenile Records in College Admissions
Questions about criminal and juvenile records in the college application process are common and frequently fail to account for the unique characteristics of juvenile justice systems. The ways in which colleges and universities ask about juvenile records often encourage applicants to disclose information in spite of statutory protections. These questions fly in the face of the public policy underlying a range of legal safeguards that are intended to help individuals with records from juvenile systems in moving forward and receiving a second chance. In recent years, a series of legislative and institutional changes have begun to restrict how colleges and universities may ask about criminal and juvenile records. Four states have passed laws limiting how criminal history may be used in the admissions process. The Common Application has moved to make asking about criminal history optional, and now gives institutions more flexibility in deciding how to phrase criminal history questions. This Article presents a first-of-its-kind empirical analysis of how the more than 800 U.S. schools that use the Common Application, and schools in the first states to restrict asking about criminal history, have responded to these changes. While these reforms have affected how frequently colleges and universities ask about criminal history, they continue to leave the door open for some postsecondary institutions to push applicants to disclose juvenile records. The growing movement to restrict use of criminal history in the college admissions process presents a critical opportunity to reconsider the role that postsecondary systems should play in supporting the rehabilitative goals of juvenile justice systems. To that end, this Article concludes by providing recommendations for legislative and institutional language that can more effectively ensure that individuals with juvenile records are given a true second chance and a meaningful opportunity to earn postsecondary degrees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Out of Balance: A Critical Analysis of Philosophical Justifications for Copyright Law Through the Lenz of Users' Rights Giving the Fourth Amendment Meaning: Creating an Adversarial Warrant Proceeding to Protect From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Private Caregiver Presumption For Elder Caregivers The Short Unhappy Life of the Negotiation Class Former Whistleblowers: Why the False Claims Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision Should Protect Former Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1