长期来看,劳动收入占比会下降吗?

Q3 Social Sciences Economie et Statistique Pub Date : 2020-01-06 DOI:10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1993
G. Cette, Lorraine Koehl, Thomas Philippon
{"title":"长期来看,劳动收入占比会下降吗?","authors":"G. Cette, Lorraine Koehl, Thomas Philippon","doi":"10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] We challenge the accepted wisdom of a global secular decline in the labor share. A simple theoretical model is proposed to highlight the main factors of change in the labor share. We document three issues in the existing literature: (i) starting periods for the empirical analysis; (ii) accounting for self employment; and (iii) accounting for residential real estate income. An empirical analysis is carried out since the post war period for France and the United States, and since the 1990s for ten developed countries and on a six country “euro area”. How the three questions above are addressed is crucial to the diagnosis. When the biases that may arise with the three issues mentioned above are eliminated, the labor share in the market sector does not show a general downward or upward trend. The choice of period has a huge impact, as does the treatment of real estate services, whose inclusion or not in the value added can result in significantly different trends.","PeriodicalId":38830,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Labor Share in the Long Term: A Decline?\",\"authors\":\"G. Cette, Lorraine Koehl, Thomas Philippon\",\"doi\":\"10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[eng] We challenge the accepted wisdom of a global secular decline in the labor share. A simple theoretical model is proposed to highlight the main factors of change in the labor share. We document three issues in the existing literature: (i) starting periods for the empirical analysis; (ii) accounting for self employment; and (iii) accounting for residential real estate income. An empirical analysis is carried out since the post war period for France and the United States, and since the 1990s for ten developed countries and on a six country “euro area”. How the three questions above are addressed is crucial to the diagnosis. When the biases that may arise with the three issues mentioned above are eliminated, the labor share in the market sector does not show a general downward or upward trend. The choice of period has a huge impact, as does the treatment of real estate services, whose inclusion or not in the value added can result in significantly different trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economie et Statistique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economie et Statistique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们对全球劳动收入占比长期下降的公认观点提出了挑战。本文提出了一个简单的理论模型,以突出劳动收入占比变化的主要因素。我们在现有文献中记录了三个问题:(i)实证分析的起始时间;(ii)核算自营职业;(三)住宅房地产收入核算。本文对战后以来的法国和美国、20世纪90年代以来的10个发达国家和6个国家的“欧元区”进行了实证分析。如何解决上述三个问题对诊断至关重要。当上述三个问题可能产生的偏差消除后,市场部门的劳动收入占比并不会呈现出普遍的下降或上升趋势。周期的选择有着巨大的影响,对房地产服务的处理也是如此,将其纳入或不纳入增加值会导致显著不同的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Labor Share in the Long Term: A Decline?
[eng] We challenge the accepted wisdom of a global secular decline in the labor share. A simple theoretical model is proposed to highlight the main factors of change in the labor share. We document three issues in the existing literature: (i) starting periods for the empirical analysis; (ii) accounting for self employment; and (iii) accounting for residential real estate income. An empirical analysis is carried out since the post war period for France and the United States, and since the 1990s for ten developed countries and on a six country “euro area”. How the three questions above are addressed is crucial to the diagnosis. When the biases that may arise with the three issues mentioned above are eliminated, the labor share in the market sector does not show a general downward or upward trend. The choice of period has a huge impact, as does the treatment of real estate services, whose inclusion or not in the value added can result in significantly different trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economie et Statistique
Economie et Statistique Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Health-Consumption Effects of Increasing Retirement Age Late in the Game Financial Support for Young Adults Through Tax and Social Transfers – Defamilialisation Scenarios Inequalities of Opportunity in the Use of Healthcare by Young Adults in France Young People’s Decisions in the Transition to Adulthood in France: The Influence of Family Factors The Links between Saving Rates, Income and Uncertainty: An Analysis based on the 2011 Household Budget Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1