影响上游天然气大型项目延期的风险因素:澳大利亚视角

Munmun Basak, V. Coffey, Robert K. Perrons
{"title":"影响上游天然气大型项目延期的风险因素:澳大利亚视角","authors":"Munmun Basak, V. Coffey, Robert K. Perrons","doi":"10.2118/192095-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The rapid expansion of the Australian gas industry has seen massive investment in mega-projects, but benefits from this have been impeded by the impact of severe project delays. Risks causing delays in upstream mega-projects are high, leading to frequent cost and schedule overruns. However, the absence of research concerning delays during this complex phase of mega-projects provides the opportunity to critically examine underlying challenges experienced by various project participants involved in upstream gas projects in Australia.\n Data was gathered through an extensive literature review, interviews with industry experts, and a survey. A list of risk factors extracted from the literature was checked with industry experts for relevance in upstream mega-projects, and missing risks were added. The survey was circulated to a random sample of people working within the natural gas projects domain, including clients, consultants, and contractor organisations. Using Likert-style five-point scales, participants rated the frequency of occurrence and severity of each of the risks impacting delays.\n A total of 70 risk factors were identified, which were then traced back to 10 risk sources that impact delays in upstream gas projects. The findings reveal that 72% of participants believe that the average delay in gas projects is between 10% and 30% in Australia. Moreover, 93% of participants mentioned that schedule slippage in the upstream phase causes severe challenges in attaining \"first gas\" and results in overall project delays. Based on the frequency of occurrence and severity indices, the magnitude of risk factors and sources was used to ascertain critical risks causing major delays. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to check the differences in perception of risk criticality influencing delays among the participants, who differed depending on work experience, job position, and the type of participants’ company. These tests indicated a good association in such perceptions. Key risk factors causing major delays included frequent change orders being issued by clients, unrealistic time schedules imposed on contracts, and poor organisational structures.\n Risks in mega-projects cannot be eliminated completely. However, a more precise identification and prioritisation of risks causing major delays, along with differences in risk perceptions of various project parties, will provide an informed and broader perspective to industry practitioners and stakeholders in managing risks more effectively to reduce upstream gas project delays.","PeriodicalId":11240,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors Affecting Delays in Upstream Natural Gas Mega-Projects: An Australian Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Munmun Basak, V. Coffey, Robert K. Perrons\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/192095-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The rapid expansion of the Australian gas industry has seen massive investment in mega-projects, but benefits from this have been impeded by the impact of severe project delays. Risks causing delays in upstream mega-projects are high, leading to frequent cost and schedule overruns. However, the absence of research concerning delays during this complex phase of mega-projects provides the opportunity to critically examine underlying challenges experienced by various project participants involved in upstream gas projects in Australia.\\n Data was gathered through an extensive literature review, interviews with industry experts, and a survey. A list of risk factors extracted from the literature was checked with industry experts for relevance in upstream mega-projects, and missing risks were added. The survey was circulated to a random sample of people working within the natural gas projects domain, including clients, consultants, and contractor organisations. Using Likert-style five-point scales, participants rated the frequency of occurrence and severity of each of the risks impacting delays.\\n A total of 70 risk factors were identified, which were then traced back to 10 risk sources that impact delays in upstream gas projects. The findings reveal that 72% of participants believe that the average delay in gas projects is between 10% and 30% in Australia. Moreover, 93% of participants mentioned that schedule slippage in the upstream phase causes severe challenges in attaining \\\"first gas\\\" and results in overall project delays. Based on the frequency of occurrence and severity indices, the magnitude of risk factors and sources was used to ascertain critical risks causing major delays. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to check the differences in perception of risk criticality influencing delays among the participants, who differed depending on work experience, job position, and the type of participants’ company. These tests indicated a good association in such perceptions. Key risk factors causing major delays included frequent change orders being issued by clients, unrealistic time schedules imposed on contracts, and poor organisational structures.\\n Risks in mega-projects cannot be eliminated completely. However, a more precise identification and prioritisation of risks causing major delays, along with differences in risk perceptions of various project parties, will provide an informed and broader perspective to industry practitioners and stakeholders in managing risks more effectively to reduce upstream gas project delays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/192095-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192095-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

澳大利亚天然气行业的快速扩张带来了对大型项目的大量投资,但项目严重延误的影响阻碍了这些投资带来的效益。上游大型项目延迟的风险很高,经常导致成本和进度超支。然而,在大型项目的复杂阶段,缺乏关于延迟的研究,这为我们提供了一个机会,可以批判性地审视澳大利亚上游天然气项目中各个项目参与者所面临的潜在挑战。数据是通过广泛的文献回顾、采访行业专家和调查收集的。从文献中提取的风险因素列表与上游大型项目的相关性进行了行业专家的检查,并添加了缺失的风险。该调查随机分发给天然气项目领域的工作人员,包括客户、顾问和承包商组织。使用李克特式五分制,参与者对影响延误的每种风险的发生频率和严重程度进行评级。总共确定了70个风险因素,然后追踪到影响上游天然气项目延迟的10个风险来源。调查结果显示,72%的参与者认为澳大利亚天然气项目的平均延迟时间在10%到30%之间。此外,93%的参与者提到,上游阶段的进度下滑对实现“第一气”造成了严重挑战,并导致整个项目延迟。根据发生频率和严重程度指标,利用风险因素的大小和来源确定导致重大延误的关键风险。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验,考察不同工作经验、工作岗位和公司类型的被试对影响延迟的风险临界性感知的差异。这些测试表明,这种看法之间存在良好的联系。导致重大延误的关键风险因素包括客户频繁发出变更命令、合同上强加的不切实际的时间表以及糟糕的组织结构。大型项目的风险无法完全消除。然而,更精确地识别和优先考虑导致重大延误的风险,以及不同项目方对风险的不同看法,将为行业从业者和利益相关者提供更有效地管理风险的更广泛的视角,以减少上游天然气项目的延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors Affecting Delays in Upstream Natural Gas Mega-Projects: An Australian Perspective
The rapid expansion of the Australian gas industry has seen massive investment in mega-projects, but benefits from this have been impeded by the impact of severe project delays. Risks causing delays in upstream mega-projects are high, leading to frequent cost and schedule overruns. However, the absence of research concerning delays during this complex phase of mega-projects provides the opportunity to critically examine underlying challenges experienced by various project participants involved in upstream gas projects in Australia. Data was gathered through an extensive literature review, interviews with industry experts, and a survey. A list of risk factors extracted from the literature was checked with industry experts for relevance in upstream mega-projects, and missing risks were added. The survey was circulated to a random sample of people working within the natural gas projects domain, including clients, consultants, and contractor organisations. Using Likert-style five-point scales, participants rated the frequency of occurrence and severity of each of the risks impacting delays. A total of 70 risk factors were identified, which were then traced back to 10 risk sources that impact delays in upstream gas projects. The findings reveal that 72% of participants believe that the average delay in gas projects is between 10% and 30% in Australia. Moreover, 93% of participants mentioned that schedule slippage in the upstream phase causes severe challenges in attaining "first gas" and results in overall project delays. Based on the frequency of occurrence and severity indices, the magnitude of risk factors and sources was used to ascertain critical risks causing major delays. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to check the differences in perception of risk criticality influencing delays among the participants, who differed depending on work experience, job position, and the type of participants’ company. These tests indicated a good association in such perceptions. Key risk factors causing major delays included frequent change orders being issued by clients, unrealistic time schedules imposed on contracts, and poor organisational structures. Risks in mega-projects cannot be eliminated completely. However, a more precise identification and prioritisation of risks causing major delays, along with differences in risk perceptions of various project parties, will provide an informed and broader perspective to industry practitioners and stakeholders in managing risks more effectively to reduce upstream gas project delays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Investigation of Crude Oil Emulsion Stability: Effect of Oil and Brine Compositions, Asphaltene, Wax, Toluene-insolubles, Temperature, Shear-stress, and Water-cut Simple Numerical Simulations to Demonstrate Key Concepts Related to Coal Seam Gas Well Integrity The Lean Fluid Lifecycle: Optimizing Consumption and Waste in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Application of Novel Predictive Analytics for Data Allocation of Commingled Production in Smart Fields A Multiscale Study on The Onset of Sand Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1