Joost Cornelisz的早期作品。Droochsloot。大教堂的新风格:1615-1630

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART OUD HOLLAND Pub Date : 2014-11-11 DOI:10.1163/18750176-90000199
Felice Geurdes
{"title":"Joost Cornelisz的早期作品。Droochsloot。大教堂的新风格:1615-1630","authors":"Felice Geurdes","doi":"10.1163/18750176-90000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters. \nUndisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.","PeriodicalId":39579,"journal":{"name":"OUD HOLLAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Het vroege werk van Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot. Nieuwe genres in de Domstad: 1615-1630\",\"authors\":\"Felice Geurdes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18750176-90000199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters. \\nUndisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000199\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUD HOLLAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大约有350幅油画,11幅素描和3幅蚀刻,乌得勒支出生的画家乔斯特·科内利斯的熟悉的作品。德鲁赫斯洛特(1585-1666)是一个非常广泛的人。他的作品有180幅,农场场景占了大部分,但一般来说都不引人注目,因此传统上把德鲁克斯洛特建立为一个平庸的,在很大程度上是平凡的画家。本文认为,他的早期作品(1615-1630)在过去没有得到应有的关注,这证明了艺术家的独创性和对艺术市场的深刻理解。档案资料和学徒合同都不存在,但根据风格比较,这项研究表明,他可能是在大卫·文克布恩斯(1576-1629)的指导下,后来可能在弗朗斯·弗兰肯二世(1581-1642)的工作室工作。特别是他的早期作品显示出与两位大师惊人的相似之处。毫无疑问,德鲁克斯洛特与勃鲁盖尔学派的艺术家有着密切的联系。这种佛兰德风格在乌得勒支还不为人所知,是由德鲁克斯洛特引入的。此外,在他的作品中,他描绘的主题在他居住的城市没有绘画传统。然而,德鲁克斯洛特并没有把自己表现为勃鲁盖尔学派的一个不反抗的门徒。他使佛兰德风格适应了他出生地的要求,并对天主教佛兰德艺术家的作品做出了重要的改变。两者的主要区别在于,德鲁克斯鲁特画的主要目标是描绘日常生活。他有意识地选择将自己的作品与特定的信仰分离开来,即使是在那些代表基督教主题的作品中。他还删去了任何可能引起冒犯的场面。在这方面,他与他的佛兰德同事有本质上的不同,后者采取了更道德的方法。这些独特的调整无疑是一种战术举动,使他的作品取悦于更多的买家。反过来,尽管在乌得勒支和荷兰北部的其他地方竞争激烈,但德鲁克斯洛特能够在相当长的一段时间内支持自己作为一名画家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Het vroege werk van Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot. Nieuwe genres in de Domstad: 1615-1630
With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters. Undisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OUD HOLLAND
OUD HOLLAND Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The periodical Oud Holland is the oldest surviving art-historical periodical in the world. Founded by A.D. de Vries and N. der Roever in 1883, it has appeared virtually without interruption ever since. It is entirely devoted to the visual arts in the Netherlands up to the mid-nineteenth century and has featured thousands of scholarly articles by Dutch and foreign authors, including numerous pioneering art-historical studies. Almost from the magazine’s inception, the publication of archival information concerning Dutch artists has played an important role. From 1885 to his death in 1946, the renowned art historian Dr. Abraham Bredius set a standard of excellence for Oud Holland.
期刊最新文献
Frans Hals and Gerrit Bleker: A joint collaboration on a fragmented family portrait (1623-1625) From fields of rye to Eyckian grandeur: New biographical data on Pieter Cristus (c. 1420-1475) The symbols of the four evangelists: A newly discovered modello for Jan Boeckhorst’s Snyders triptych (c. 1654) ‘Diverses veues deseignees en la Ville de Rome’: Herman van Swanevelt’s 1650 print series for Gédéon Tallemant des Réaux Under the skin: Portraits by Abraham de Vries (c. 1590-1649/50) recognised and revealed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1