{"title":"Joost Cornelisz的早期作品。Droochsloot。大教堂的新风格:1615-1630","authors":"Felice Geurdes","doi":"10.1163/18750176-90000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters. \nUndisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.","PeriodicalId":39579,"journal":{"name":"OUD HOLLAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Het vroege werk van Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot. Nieuwe genres in de Domstad: 1615-1630\",\"authors\":\"Felice Geurdes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18750176-90000199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters. \\nUndisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OUD HOLLAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000199\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUD HOLLAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750176-90000199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
Het vroege werk van Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot. Nieuwe genres in de Domstad: 1615-1630
With approximately 350 paintings, eleven drawings and three etches, the familiar oeuvre of Utrecht-born painter Joost Cornelisz. Droochsloot (1585-1666) is nothing short of extensive. Numbering 180, his farming scenes comprise the majority of his work, but are generally unremarkable, thereby traditionally establishing Droochsloot as a mediocre, largely unexceptional painter. This article argues that his earlier works (1615-1630), which have not received the attention they deserve in the past, are a testament to the artist's ingenuity and profound understanding of the art market. Archive sources and apprenticeship contracts are absent, but based on stylistic comparison this research suggests that he may have been under the tutelage of David Vinckboons (1576-1629) and at a later date possibly at work in the studio of Frans Francken II (1581-1642). Particularly his early work displays striking similarities with that of both masters.
Undisputedly, Droochsloot was in close contact with the artists of the Brueghel school. This Flemish style was not yet known in Utrecht, and was introduced there by Droochsloot. Moreover, in his work he depicted themes that did not have a pictorial tradition in his city of residence. However, Droochsloot does not present himself as an unresisting disciple of the Bruegel school. He adapted the Flemish style to the demands of his birthplace, and made important changes with respect to the works of the Catholic Flemish artists. The principal difference is that Droochsloots primarily aimed to depict everyday life. He made a conscious choice to detach his work from a specific faith, even in those works that represent Christian themes. He furthermore left out any scenes that might be cause for offense. In that respect, he is essentially different from his Flemish colleagues, who took a much more moralistic approach. These unique adjustments were undoubtedly a tactical move that made his work pleasing to a larger audience of buyers. In turn, despite the immense competition in Utrecht and the rest of the Northern Netherlands, Droochsloot was able to support himself as a painter for a considerable period of time.
OUD HOLLANDArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍:
The periodical Oud Holland is the oldest surviving art-historical periodical in the world. Founded by A.D. de Vries and N. der Roever in 1883, it has appeared virtually without interruption ever since. It is entirely devoted to the visual arts in the Netherlands up to the mid-nineteenth century and has featured thousands of scholarly articles by Dutch and foreign authors, including numerous pioneering art-historical studies. Almost from the magazine’s inception, the publication of archival information concerning Dutch artists has played an important role. From 1885 to his death in 1946, the renowned art historian Dr. Abraham Bredius set a standard of excellence for Oud Holland.