智力上的谦逊:一个新的心理学视角下的老问题

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2021-07-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2021.106999
Wacław Bąk, Bartosz Wójtowicz, Jan Kutnik
{"title":"智力上的谦逊:一个新的心理学视角下的老问题","authors":"Wacław Bąk, Bartosz Wójtowicz, Jan Kutnik","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2021.106999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though having been emphasised by philosophers and theologians for centuries, it is only in the last few years that the concept of intellectual humility has been explicitly defined and studied by empirical psychology. However, it has been long enough to recognise the prominent role that being intellectually humble plays for humane functioning, both at an intra- and inter-individual level. Having started with a broader philosophical and historical context, the present paper discusses the psychological conceptualisations of intellectual humility. Then the recent empirical studies are reviewed, including four strands of research referring to personality traits, cognitive functioning, social relations and religiosity. After presenting selected results, the prospects of psychological research on intellectual humility are discussed, including the limitations and challenges of measurement techniques as well as possible directions for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535625/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual humility: an old problem in a new psychological perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Wacław Bąk, Bartosz Wójtowicz, Jan Kutnik\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp.2021.106999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Though having been emphasised by philosophers and theologians for centuries, it is only in the last few years that the concept of intellectual humility has been explicitly defined and studied by empirical psychology. However, it has been long enough to recognise the prominent role that being intellectually humble plays for humane functioning, both at an intra- and inter-individual level. Having started with a broader philosophical and historical context, the present paper discusses the psychological conceptualisations of intellectual humility. Then the recent empirical studies are reviewed, including four strands of research referring to personality traits, cognitive functioning, social relations and religiosity. After presenting selected results, the prospects of psychological research on intellectual humility are discussed, including the limitations and challenges of measurement techniques as well as possible directions for future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.106999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.106999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

s标题说明。* 2021年的结果反映了2021年5月8日进行的PsycInfo搜索。Wacław Bąk, Bartosz Wójtowicz, Jan Kutnik 3一个体现了知识谦逊的思想家的例子。当德尔菲的神谕称他为人类中最聪明的人时,很长一段时间他都不相信这样的判断(柏拉图,约公元前399年/2005年)。苏格拉底特别感兴趣的问题涉及诸如善、美、真或正义的意义等价值。苏格拉底确信他自己也不知道价值是什么,但找出它是必要的。他还决定向神谕证明她对他的看法是错误的,他并不是最聪明的。为此,他决定向那些被认为特别聪明或在他看来特别聪明的人询问有关价值观的问题。当对话者回答说他知道价值观是什么时,苏格拉底问了更多的问题,在每一个情况下,最终气馁,他不得不承认,他没有找到比他更聪明的人。这使他很困惑,因为他也不认为自己聪明。但是,用柏拉图(约公元前399年/2005年,第83页)的话来说,苏格拉底从他的研究中得出的结论是:“我比这个人聪明;因为我们俩谁也不知道什么美好的东西,可是这个人不知道,却自以为知道;而我既然什么也不知道,也就不认为自己知道。那么,在这件小事上,我似乎至少比这个人聪明,因为我不知道的事情,我也不认为我知道。”由此产生了著名的苏格拉底式的“我知道我什么都不知道”,这是一种象征性的、模范的态度表达,揭示了知识分子的谦逊,与那些“知道”的人的傲慢形成对比,结果只是“他们似乎知道”。在哲学史上,我们可以找到许多思想家,他们对人类知识的局限性特别感兴趣,并对自己的知识表现出真正的谦卑态度。基于认识论,我们可以说,我们正在讨论认识到认知的局限性和确定不可知论或怀疑主义范围的能力。关于认识世界和事物本质的能力,那些完全理解自己知识的不完善的人包括休谟(Hume & Millican, 2007)和康德(Langton, 1998)。可以说,几个世纪以来,知识分子谦逊的观念在哲学传统的两个维度中确立了自己的地位。首先,它是定义一个理想的学者和教师的美德,不仅喜欢传授知识,而且愿意质疑他们所知道的,并愿意审查自己的观点。在这种情况下,考虑了知识谦卑的伦理维度,将IH视为一种特定的态度(Roberts & Wood, 2003;Tanesini, 2016)。知识谦逊的第二个方面体现在认知方法中,表达了一种认识论或元认识论的观点,而不是一种伦理立场。这种立场与对推理的纯度和清晰度、逻辑正确性以及认识到个人认知技能或能力不足导致的知识局限性的特殊敏感性有关(Whitcomb et al., 2015)。随着科学理论的发展和思维方式的变革,Thomas Kuhn(1962/1996)完美地描述了这两个方面是如何联系在一起的。在他分析的例子中,经常阻碍进步的因素之一是伟大的科学家缺乏智力上的谦逊。这一特征对于那些打破常规、实施“一种模式”的人来说尤为明显
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intellectual humility: an old problem in a new psychological perspective.

Though having been emphasised by philosophers and theologians for centuries, it is only in the last few years that the concept of intellectual humility has been explicitly defined and studied by empirical psychology. However, it has been long enough to recognise the prominent role that being intellectually humble plays for humane functioning, both at an intra- and inter-individual level. Having started with a broader philosophical and historical context, the present paper discusses the psychological conceptualisations of intellectual humility. Then the recent empirical studies are reviewed, including four strands of research referring to personality traits, cognitive functioning, social relations and religiosity. After presenting selected results, the prospects of psychological research on intellectual humility are discussed, including the limitations and challenges of measurement techniques as well as possible directions for future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Who agrees more? The role of age, education, and the ability to solve verbal analogies in acquiescence Psychometric properties of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TIPI-CA) in a Spanish sample Daily state of motivation as the effect of appreciation in a diary study. The effect of risk of contracting and fear of COVID-19 on burnout and job satisfaction in Polish teachers Sexual satisfaction and oversexualization among adults. The moderating role of self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1