情绪的认知理论

M. Sterling
{"title":"情绪的认知理论","authors":"M. Sterling","doi":"10.5840/SWJPHIL197910239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I shall discuss certain alleged consequences of the \"cognitive theory\" of emotions. This cognitive conception of emotions has been decisively embraced and most extensively dealt with by Robert C. Solomon in his recent book The Passions. Thus in the present paper I shall be thinking primarily of Solomon's discussion of the cognitive theory, and my quotations will be exclusively from The Passions. First I shall indicate what the theory asserts; then I shall call attention to certain consequences that Solomon takes to follow from it; and last I shall discuss these putative consequences, being specifically concerned to say why I believe that such consequences do not really follow from the cognitive theory of emotions. The cognitive theory is offered as an alternative mainly to such influential views as the various behavioristic, physiological, feeling, and bodily-sensation theories of the emotions. It concedes that emotions may be correlated , or invariably associated, with certain kinds of behavior, physiological disturbances, and sensations; however, it denies that such things constitute emotions. Its fundamental contention is that emotions per se are nothing but judgments of a certain sort. Consider the following statement from The Passions :","PeriodicalId":83275,"journal":{"name":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","volume":"2007 1","pages":"165-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cognitive Theory of Emotions\",\"authors\":\"M. Sterling\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/SWJPHIL197910239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I shall discuss certain alleged consequences of the \\\"cognitive theory\\\" of emotions. This cognitive conception of emotions has been decisively embraced and most extensively dealt with by Robert C. Solomon in his recent book The Passions. Thus in the present paper I shall be thinking primarily of Solomon's discussion of the cognitive theory, and my quotations will be exclusively from The Passions. First I shall indicate what the theory asserts; then I shall call attention to certain consequences that Solomon takes to follow from it; and last I shall discuss these putative consequences, being specifically concerned to say why I believe that such consequences do not really follow from the cognitive theory of emotions. The cognitive theory is offered as an alternative mainly to such influential views as the various behavioristic, physiological, feeling, and bodily-sensation theories of the emotions. It concedes that emotions may be correlated , or invariably associated, with certain kinds of behavior, physiological disturbances, and sensations; however, it denies that such things constitute emotions. Its fundamental contention is that emotions per se are nothing but judgments of a certain sort. Consider the following statement from The Passions :\",\"PeriodicalId\":83275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southwestern journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"2007 1\",\"pages\":\"165-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southwestern journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/SWJPHIL197910239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/SWJPHIL197910239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将讨论情绪“认知理论”的某些所谓后果。罗伯特·c·所罗门(Robert C. Solomon)在他的新书《激情》(The emotions)中明确地接受了这种对情感的认知概念,并对其进行了最广泛的论述。因此,在本文中,我将主要考虑所罗门对认知理论的讨论,我的引文将完全来自《激情》。首先,我要说明这个理论的主张;然后我要提醒大家注意所罗门由此带来的某些后果;最后,我将讨论这些假定的结果,特别要说明为什么我认为这些结果并不能真正从情绪的认知理论中得出。认知理论主要是作为诸如各种情绪的行为主义、生理学、感觉和身体感觉理论等有影响力的观点的替代。它承认情绪可能与某些行为、生理障碍和感觉相关,或者总是相关的;然而,它否认这些东西构成情感。它的基本论点是,情感本身只不过是某种判断。想想《激情》中的下面这段话:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cognitive Theory of Emotions
In this article I shall discuss certain alleged consequences of the "cognitive theory" of emotions. This cognitive conception of emotions has been decisively embraced and most extensively dealt with by Robert C. Solomon in his recent book The Passions. Thus in the present paper I shall be thinking primarily of Solomon's discussion of the cognitive theory, and my quotations will be exclusively from The Passions. First I shall indicate what the theory asserts; then I shall call attention to certain consequences that Solomon takes to follow from it; and last I shall discuss these putative consequences, being specifically concerned to say why I believe that such consequences do not really follow from the cognitive theory of emotions. The cognitive theory is offered as an alternative mainly to such influential views as the various behavioristic, physiological, feeling, and bodily-sensation theories of the emotions. It concedes that emotions may be correlated , or invariably associated, with certain kinds of behavior, physiological disturbances, and sensations; however, it denies that such things constitute emotions. Its fundamental contention is that emotions per se are nothing but judgments of a certain sort. Consider the following statement from The Passions :
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology: A New Way into Transcendental Phenomenology?: Some Thoughts on Husserl’s Last Part of the Crisis Nietzsche, Volume I: The Will to Power as Art The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of the Thing Husserl’s Relations to British Empiricism Heidegger and the Problem of Being-With
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1