{"title":"2002年爱达荷州南部大型河流的鱼群和最小采样努力评估","authors":"T. R. Maret, D. S. Ott","doi":"10.3133/WRI034274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A critical issue surrounding biomonitoring in large rivers (fifth- through seventh-order) is the minimum sampling-reach distance required to collect an adequate number of fish to represent the fish assemblage within a reach. Excessive sampling effort (excessive reach length) is costly in terms of work hours, reduces the number of sites that can be visited, can compromise field-crew safety, can be logistically unfeasible, and can cause unnecessary injury to captured fish. On the other hand, inadequate sampling effort can produce consider-able variability in multiple samples collected at a site and may underrepresent the species or river condition present. During the summer of 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, determined the minimum sampling effort required to characterize fish assemblages at 17 large-river sites in southern Idaho. The study was done as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. Electrofishing methods and multiple gear types were used to collect sample populations of fish in river reach lengths representing 40 and 100 times the wetted channel width. Minimum sampling effort was assessed by comparing the relation between reach length and the number of species collected, total individuals collected, and final Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores. developed specifically for large Idaho rivers, received scores of less than 50, indicating poor biotic integrity.","PeriodicalId":23603,"journal":{"name":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","volume":"811 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of fish assemblages and minimum sampling effort required to determine botic integrity of large rivers in southern Idaho, 2002\",\"authors\":\"T. R. Maret, D. S. Ott\",\"doi\":\"10.3133/WRI034274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. A critical issue surrounding biomonitoring in large rivers (fifth- through seventh-order) is the minimum sampling-reach distance required to collect an adequate number of fish to represent the fish assemblage within a reach. Excessive sampling effort (excessive reach length) is costly in terms of work hours, reduces the number of sites that can be visited, can compromise field-crew safety, can be logistically unfeasible, and can cause unnecessary injury to captured fish. On the other hand, inadequate sampling effort can produce consider-able variability in multiple samples collected at a site and may underrepresent the species or river condition present. During the summer of 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, determined the minimum sampling effort required to characterize fish assemblages at 17 large-river sites in southern Idaho. The study was done as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. Electrofishing methods and multiple gear types were used to collect sample populations of fish in river reach lengths representing 40 and 100 times the wetted channel width. Minimum sampling effort was assessed by comparing the relation between reach length and the number of species collected, total individuals collected, and final Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores. developed specifically for large Idaho rivers, received scores of less than 50, indicating poor biotic integrity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water-Resources Investigations Report\",\"volume\":\"811 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water-Resources Investigations Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3133/WRI034274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/WRI034274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of fish assemblages and minimum sampling effort required to determine botic integrity of large rivers in southern Idaho, 2002
Abstract. A critical issue surrounding biomonitoring in large rivers (fifth- through seventh-order) is the minimum sampling-reach distance required to collect an adequate number of fish to represent the fish assemblage within a reach. Excessive sampling effort (excessive reach length) is costly in terms of work hours, reduces the number of sites that can be visited, can compromise field-crew safety, can be logistically unfeasible, and can cause unnecessary injury to captured fish. On the other hand, inadequate sampling effort can produce consider-able variability in multiple samples collected at a site and may underrepresent the species or river condition present. During the summer of 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, determined the minimum sampling effort required to characterize fish assemblages at 17 large-river sites in southern Idaho. The study was done as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. Electrofishing methods and multiple gear types were used to collect sample populations of fish in river reach lengths representing 40 and 100 times the wetted channel width. Minimum sampling effort was assessed by comparing the relation between reach length and the number of species collected, total individuals collected, and final Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores. developed specifically for large Idaho rivers, received scores of less than 50, indicating poor biotic integrity.