前列腺癌及良性前列腺增生的psa参数及其诊断价值

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5505/TJB.2013.39974
D. Koçer, C. Karakukcu, H. Karaman, A. Tasdemir, M. Ergul
{"title":"前列腺癌及良性前列腺增生的psa参数及其诊断价值","authors":"D. Koçer, C. Karakukcu, H. Karaman, A. Tasdemir, M. Ergul","doi":"10.5505/TJB.2013.39974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSA- based parameters in prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to determine the relation between serum PSA and histopathological grade in PCa. Methods: This retrospective study includes data of 320 patients with PCa (n: 155) and BPH patients (n: 165). Serum PSA levels and Gleason scores of patients were determi- ned by examining the records of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathology Laboratory. We classified the patients according to total PSA (tPSA) levels to determine diagnostic per- formance of PSA-based parameters at different cut-off levels. Serum tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) were analyzed with chemiluminometric method. Results: There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA values (p<0.05) in whole group (WG). There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in cPSA and f/tPSA in group with tPSA<4 ng/mL (LG); in f/tPSA values in group with tPSA 4-10 ng/mL (intermediate group, IG). According to histopathological classification, all of the parameters except f/tPSA were significantly dif- ferent between groups in PCa (p<0.001). Significant positive correlations were found bet- ween Gleason scores and tPSA (r=0.577), fPSA (r=0.491) and cPSA (r=0.562) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We suggest the use of f/tPSA to improve the differentiation of BPH and PCa in IG. The best cut-off points for tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA were 4.0, 2.21, 3.16 ng/mL and 0.17 respectively. Based on the results of ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 0.17 for f/tPSA and 3.16 ng/mL for cPSA may be acceptable.","PeriodicalId":23355,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","volume":"40 1","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSA-based parameters and their diagnostic performances in patients with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia\",\"authors\":\"D. Koçer, C. Karakukcu, H. Karaman, A. Tasdemir, M. Ergul\",\"doi\":\"10.5505/TJB.2013.39974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSA- based parameters in prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to determine the relation between serum PSA and histopathological grade in PCa. Methods: This retrospective study includes data of 320 patients with PCa (n: 155) and BPH patients (n: 165). Serum PSA levels and Gleason scores of patients were determi- ned by examining the records of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathology Laboratory. We classified the patients according to total PSA (tPSA) levels to determine diagnostic per- formance of PSA-based parameters at different cut-off levels. Serum tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) were analyzed with chemiluminometric method. Results: There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA values (p<0.05) in whole group (WG). There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in cPSA and f/tPSA in group with tPSA<4 ng/mL (LG); in f/tPSA values in group with tPSA 4-10 ng/mL (intermediate group, IG). According to histopathological classification, all of the parameters except f/tPSA were significantly dif- ferent between groups in PCa (p<0.001). Significant positive correlations were found bet- ween Gleason scores and tPSA (r=0.577), fPSA (r=0.491) and cPSA (r=0.562) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We suggest the use of f/tPSA to improve the differentiation of BPH and PCa in IG. The best cut-off points for tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA were 4.0, 2.21, 3.16 ng/mL and 0.17 respectively. Based on the results of ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 0.17 for f/tPSA and 3.16 ng/mL for cPSA may be acceptable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"37-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJB.2013.39974\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry-turk Biyokimya Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJB.2013.39974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价基于PSA的指标对前列腺癌(PCa)和良性前列腺增生(BPH)的诊断价值,并探讨血清PSA与前列腺癌组织病理学分级的关系。方法:本回顾性研究包括320例PCa患者(155例)和BPH患者(165例)的资料。通过检查临床生化和病理实验室记录,测定患者血清PSA水平和格里森评分。我们根据总PSA (tPSA)水平对患者进行分类,以确定不同临界值下基于PSA的参数的诊断效能。用化学发光法分析血清tPSA、游离PSA (fPSA)和络合PSA (cPSA)。结果:BPH与PCa患者tPSA、fPSA、cPSA及f/tPSA全组比较差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在tPSA<4 ng/mL (LG)组中,BPH与PCa患者的cPSA、f/tPSA差异有统计学意义;tPSA 4 ~ 10 ng/mL组(中间组,IG) f/tPSA值根据组织病理学分类,除f/tPSA外,各组间差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。Gleason评分与tPSA (r=0.577)、fPSA (r=0.491)、cPSA (r=0.562)呈显著正相关(p<0.001)。结论:我们建议使用f/tPSA促进IG BPH和PCa的分化。tPSA、fPSA、cPSA和f/tPSA的最佳临界值分别为4.0、2.21、3.16 ng/mL和0.17。根据ROC分析的结果,f/tPSA的临界值为0.17,cPSA的临界值为3.16 ng/mL是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PSA-based parameters and their diagnostic performances in patients with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSA- based parameters in prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to determine the relation between serum PSA and histopathological grade in PCa. Methods: This retrospective study includes data of 320 patients with PCa (n: 155) and BPH patients (n: 165). Serum PSA levels and Gleason scores of patients were determi- ned by examining the records of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathology Laboratory. We classified the patients according to total PSA (tPSA) levels to determine diagnostic per- formance of PSA-based parameters at different cut-off levels. Serum tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) were analyzed with chemiluminometric method. Results: There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA values (p<0.05) in whole group (WG). There were significant differences between BPH and PCa patients in cPSA and f/tPSA in group with tPSA<4 ng/mL (LG); in f/tPSA values in group with tPSA 4-10 ng/mL (intermediate group, IG). According to histopathological classification, all of the parameters except f/tPSA were significantly dif- ferent between groups in PCa (p<0.001). Significant positive correlations were found bet- ween Gleason scores and tPSA (r=0.577), fPSA (r=0.491) and cPSA (r=0.562) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We suggest the use of f/tPSA to improve the differentiation of BPH and PCa in IG. The best cut-off points for tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA were 4.0, 2.21, 3.16 ng/mL and 0.17 respectively. Based on the results of ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 0.17 for f/tPSA and 3.16 ng/mL for cPSA may be acceptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Biochemistry (TJB), official journal of Turkish Biochemical Society, is issued electronically every 2 months. The main aim of the journal is to support the research and publishing culture by ensuring that every published manuscript has an added value and thus providing international acceptance of the “readability” of the manuscripts published in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Expression of a functional recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF 165 ) in Arabidopsis thaliana An assessment of phytochemical constituents and antioxidant potential of Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz Within the context of good clinical laboratory practices evaluation of measurement uncertainty of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Prostate Specific Antigen parameters Effects of Dietary Chicken Grill Oil and Sunflower Seed Oil on Blood and Liver Oxidant/Antioxidant Status and Liver Function Tests in Laying Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) C-Reactive Protein vs. High - Sensitivity C - Reactive Protein: What is the Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1