Md. Rodeano Roslee
{"title":"ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ON KARAMBUNAI-LOK BUNUQ LANDSLIDES, KOTA KINABALU, SABAH","authors":"Md. Rodeano Roslee","doi":"10.26480/MJG.02.2019.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes landslide occurrences in debris materials, together with its engineering geological and geotechnical setting. The predictions from conventional geotechnical slope stability analyses, taking into account topography, hydrological, geotechnical and engineering geological effects, are compared with the observed pattern of instability. Physical and mechanical properties of eight (8) soil samples indicated that the failure materials mainly consist of poorly graded materials of sandy clay soils and characterized by low to intermediate plasticity, containing of normal clay (0.42 to 0.95), very high degree of swelling (5.63 to 10.35), variable low to high water content (11.95 % to 19.92 %), specific gravity ranges from 2.60 to 2.68, low permeability (6.68 X 10-4 to 1.52 X 10-4 cm/s), friction angle () ranges from 18.50 ̊ to 34.20 ̊ and cohesion (C) ranges from 3.36 kN/m2 to 19.50 kN/m2 with very soft to soft of undrained shear strength (9.47 kN/m2 to 32.30 kN/m2). Geotechnical limit equilibrium stability analyses of entire slopes are rarely able to predict the smaller-scale initiation events leading to landslide occurrences, because these are controlled by local topography, water runoff and groundwater conditions, weathered materials and engineering geological setting. Slope stability analysis shows that the factor of safety value is ranges from 0.805 to 0.817 (unstable). It is concluded that the failures was debris flow and resulted from a combination of factors. Engineering geological evaluation should be prioritized and take into consideration in the initial step in all infrastructure program. Development planning has to consider the geohazard and geoenvironmental management program. This engineering geological study may play a vital role in slope stability assessment to ensure public safety.","PeriodicalId":53054,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/MJG.02.2019.01.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了滑坡发生在碎石材料中的情况,以及它的工程地质和岩土环境。考虑到地形、水文、岩土和工程地质效应,传统岩土边坡稳定性分析的预测结果与观测到的失稳模式进行了比较。8个土样的物理力学特性分析表明,破坏材料主要为砂质粘土的低塑性至中等塑性,含普通粘土(0.42 ~ 0.95),膨胀度极高(5.63 ~ 10.35),低含水量变化(11.95% ~ 19.92%),比重为2.60 ~ 2.68,渗透性低(6.68 × 10-4 ~ 1.52 × 10-4 cm/s)。摩擦角(粒径)的变化范围为18.50 ~ 34.20,粘聚力(粒径)的变化范围为3.36 ~ 19.50 kN/m2,抗剪强度为9.47 ~ 32.30 kN/m2。整个边坡的岩土极限平衡稳定性分析很少能够预测导致滑坡发生的较小规模的起裂事件,因为这些事件受当地地形、径流和地下水条件、风化物质和工程地质环境的控制。边坡稳定性分析表明,边坡安全系数取值范围为0.805 ~ 0.817(不稳定)。结论为泥石流破坏,是多种因素共同作用的结果。在所有基础设施建设项目中,工程地质评价都是优先考虑的问题。发展规划必须考虑地质灾害和地质环境管理方案。该工程地质研究对边坡稳定性评价具有重要意义,对保障公众安全具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION ON KARAMBUNAI-LOK BUNUQ LANDSLIDES, KOTA KINABALU, SABAH
This paper describes landslide occurrences in debris materials, together with its engineering geological and geotechnical setting. The predictions from conventional geotechnical slope stability analyses, taking into account topography, hydrological, geotechnical and engineering geological effects, are compared with the observed pattern of instability. Physical and mechanical properties of eight (8) soil samples indicated that the failure materials mainly consist of poorly graded materials of sandy clay soils and characterized by low to intermediate plasticity, containing of normal clay (0.42 to 0.95), very high degree of swelling (5.63 to 10.35), variable low to high water content (11.95 % to 19.92 %), specific gravity ranges from 2.60 to 2.68, low permeability (6.68 X 10-4 to 1.52 X 10-4 cm/s), friction angle () ranges from 18.50 ̊ to 34.20 ̊ and cohesion (C) ranges from 3.36 kN/m2 to 19.50 kN/m2 with very soft to soft of undrained shear strength (9.47 kN/m2 to 32.30 kN/m2). Geotechnical limit equilibrium stability analyses of entire slopes are rarely able to predict the smaller-scale initiation events leading to landslide occurrences, because these are controlled by local topography, water runoff and groundwater conditions, weathered materials and engineering geological setting. Slope stability analysis shows that the factor of safety value is ranges from 0.805 to 0.817 (unstable). It is concluded that the failures was debris flow and resulted from a combination of factors. Engineering geological evaluation should be prioritized and take into consideration in the initial step in all infrastructure program. Development planning has to consider the geohazard and geoenvironmental management program. This engineering geological study may play a vital role in slope stability assessment to ensure public safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF SUBSOILS IN IKATE AREA, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA: IMPLICATIONS ON FOUNDATION INTEGRITY AND CORROSIVITY EFFECT OF COMPACTION AT DIFFERENT ENERGY LEVELS ON THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF STABILIZED SOILS COMPARISON OF ORDINARY KRIGING (OK) AND INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTING (IDW) METHODS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF A MODIFIED PALAEOPLACER GOLD DEPOSIT: A CASE STUDY OF THE TEBEREBIE GOLD DEPOSIT, SW GHANA CHARACTERIZATION OF INCHNOGENERA TRACE FOSSILS IN SEDIMENTARY FACIES; A CASE STUDY OF TOMAYODE FIELD, NIGER DELTA NIGERIA PETROGRAPHIC AND GEOCHEMICAL CONSTRAINTS ON TECTONIC SETTINGS OF THE BIRIMIAN SUPERGROUP VOLCANIC ROCKS, EVIDENCE FROM NEW DROBO ENVIRONS SOUTH OF JAMAN DISTRICT IN THE BONO REGION OF GHANA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1