识别记忆的注意需求研究:对学习时编码深度和测试时注意水平的操纵

Lauren M. Knott, S. Dewhurst
{"title":"识别记忆的注意需求研究:对学习时编码深度和测试时注意水平的操纵","authors":"Lauren M. Knott, S. Dewhurst","doi":"10.1080/09541440802539515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"47 1","pages":"1045 - 1071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M. Knott, S. Dewhurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09541440802539515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of cognitive psychology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"1045 - 1071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of cognitive psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802539515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802539515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

两个实验研究了在控制学习加工水平后分散注意对测试的影响。实验1以字谜和完整字谜两种形式进行研究。实验2采用完全注意和分散注意两种方法进行研究。在这两个实验中,参与者都进行了一项识别测试,其中一项是全注意力测试,另一项是分散注意力测试。对记忆和知道反应的分析表明,测试中的DA对字谜和全注意力学习项目的记忆反应没有影响。与此相反,认知反应随深度编码条件的增加而下降,并且在深度编码条件和浅编码条件下都出现了这种情况。目前的研究证实了最近的发现(Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a),即认识可以依赖于更多的受控检索过程,而记忆则可以依赖于更多的自动检索过程。讨论了与回忆和熟悉以及记忆和知道反应相关的控制过程的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the attentional demands of recognition memory: Manipulating depth of encoding at study and level of attention at test
Two experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at test after manipulating levels of processing at study. In Experiment 1 items were studied either intact or as anagrams. In Experiment 2 items were studied with either full or divided attention (DA). In both experiments participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Analysis of remember and know responses revealed that DA at test had no effect on remember responses to anagrams or to items studied with full attention. In contrast, Know responses decreased with DA at test, and this occurred for items studied in both deep and shallow encoding conditions. The present study confirms recent findings (Knott & Dewhurst, 2007a) that knowing can rely on more controlled retrieval processes, whereas remembering can rely on more automatic retrieval processes. Differences in the controlled processes associated with recollection and familiarity and remember and know responses are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the Bayesian constraints in the Bayesian reader? Reply to Norris and Kinoshita (2010) Explanation versus accommodation: Reply to Bowers (2010) Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills The contribution of familiarity to within- and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1