利用PSO-LSSVM方法预测凝析气井井口流道亚临界两相流

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100057
Azim Kalantariasl , Arash Yazdanpanah , Ehsan Ghanat-pisheh , Negar Shahsavar
{"title":"利用PSO-LSSVM方法预测凝析气井井口流道亚临界两相流","authors":"Azim Kalantariasl ,&nbsp;Arash Yazdanpanah ,&nbsp;Ehsan Ghanat-pisheh ,&nbsp;Negar Shahsavar","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Several empirical correlations for prediction of wellhead<span><span> gas flow rate<span> have been presented in the literature. In this study, subcritical wellhead choke<span><span> flow data of gas condensate wells that cover a wide range of flow rates (5.4–113 MMSCF/D) and choke sizes (32–192 64th in) were used to develop an intelligent prediction method. Subcritical two-phase flow wellhead choke data from 193 tests of gas condensate wells in 10 fields have been used. Measured pressure drop across the choke, </span>gas to liquid ratio (GLR) and choke size were the input parameters. PSO-LSSVM method was applied to field-measured test data and optimized model parameters were obtained for prediction of gas flow rate as objective function. In addition, the results were compared with recently published empirical correlations developed for </span></span></span>subcritical flow. Accuracy of the proposed model were evaluated with error parameters; AARD (average absolute relative deviation), RSME (relative square mean error), and R-squared. Results show the superiority of the proposed model with high accuracy. Observed data and model prediction matched very well with R</span></span><sup>2</sup><span> of 0.9996 and RMSE of 1.46. In addition, five test data that have not been used in the process of model development (training and testing) were used to assess the generality of the proposed mode. Very good agreement between model prediction and observed gas flow rate data was obtained and can be used for estimation of gas flow rate of subcritical chokes with high confidence.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of sub-critical two-phase flow through wellhead chokes of gas condensate wells using PSO-LSSVM method\",\"authors\":\"Azim Kalantariasl ,&nbsp;Arash Yazdanpanah ,&nbsp;Ehsan Ghanat-pisheh ,&nbsp;Negar Shahsavar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Several empirical correlations for prediction of wellhead<span><span> gas flow rate<span> have been presented in the literature. In this study, subcritical wellhead choke<span><span> flow data of gas condensate wells that cover a wide range of flow rates (5.4–113 MMSCF/D) and choke sizes (32–192 64th in) were used to develop an intelligent prediction method. Subcritical two-phase flow wellhead choke data from 193 tests of gas condensate wells in 10 fields have been used. Measured pressure drop across the choke, </span>gas to liquid ratio (GLR) and choke size were the input parameters. PSO-LSSVM method was applied to field-measured test data and optimized model parameters were obtained for prediction of gas flow rate as objective function. In addition, the results were compared with recently published empirical correlations developed for </span></span></span>subcritical flow. Accuracy of the proposed model were evaluated with error parameters; AARD (average absolute relative deviation), RSME (relative square mean error), and R-squared. Results show the superiority of the proposed model with high accuracy. Observed data and model prediction matched very well with R</span></span><sup>2</sup><span> of 0.9996 and RMSE of 1.46. In addition, five test data that have not been used in the process of model development (training and testing) were used to assess the generality of the proposed mode. Very good agreement between model prediction and observed gas flow rate data was obtained and can be used for estimation of gas flow rate of subcritical chokes with high confidence.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266626042100027X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266626042100027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

文献中已经提出了几种预测井口气体流量的经验关系式。在本研究中,使用了广泛的流量范围(5.4-113 MMSCF/D)和节流口尺寸(32-192 64英寸)的凝析气井亚临界井口节流流量数据,开发了一种智能预测方法。采用了10个油田193口凝析气井试验的亚临界两相流井口节流数据。输入参数为节流口压降、气液比(GLR)和节流口尺寸。将PSO-LSSVM方法应用于现场实测试验数据,得到优化后的模型参数,以预测瓦斯流量为目标函数。此外,还将结果与最近发表的亚临界流的经验相关性进行了比较。利用误差参数对模型的精度进行了评价;AARD(平均绝对相对偏差)、RSME(相对均方误差)和r平方。结果表明,该模型具有较高的精度和优越性。观测数据与模型预测吻合良好,R2为0.9996,RMSE为1.46。此外,还使用了模型开发过程中未使用的5个测试数据(训练和测试)来评估所提出模型的通用性。模型预测结果与实测气体流量数据吻合较好,可用于亚临界节流道气体流量的高置信度估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of sub-critical two-phase flow through wellhead chokes of gas condensate wells using PSO-LSSVM method

Several empirical correlations for prediction of wellhead gas flow rate have been presented in the literature. In this study, subcritical wellhead choke flow data of gas condensate wells that cover a wide range of flow rates (5.4–113 MMSCF/D) and choke sizes (32–192 64th in) were used to develop an intelligent prediction method. Subcritical two-phase flow wellhead choke data from 193 tests of gas condensate wells in 10 fields have been used. Measured pressure drop across the choke, gas to liquid ratio (GLR) and choke size were the input parameters. PSO-LSSVM method was applied to field-measured test data and optimized model parameters were obtained for prediction of gas flow rate as objective function. In addition, the results were compared with recently published empirical correlations developed for subcritical flow. Accuracy of the proposed model were evaluated with error parameters; AARD (average absolute relative deviation), RSME (relative square mean error), and R-squared. Results show the superiority of the proposed model with high accuracy. Observed data and model prediction matched very well with R2 of 0.9996 and RMSE of 1.46. In addition, five test data that have not been used in the process of model development (training and testing) were used to assess the generality of the proposed mode. Very good agreement between model prediction and observed gas flow rate data was obtained and can be used for estimation of gas flow rate of subcritical chokes with high confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1