对不同的私有数据进行隐私保护分类

IF 6.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Pub Date : 2020-12-13 DOI:10.1002/widm.1399
Ezgi Zorarpacı, S. A. Özel
{"title":"对不同的私有数据进行隐私保护分类","authors":"Ezgi Zorarpacı, S. A. Özel","doi":"10.1002/widm.1399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy preserving data classification is an important research area in data mining field. The goal of a privacy preserving classification algorithm is to protect the sensitive information as much as possible, while providing satisfactory classification accuracy. Differential privacy is a strong privacy guarantee that enables privacy of sensitive data stored in a database by determining the ratio of sensitive information leakage with respect to an ɛ parameter. In this study, our aim is to investigate the classification performance of the state‐of‐the‐art classification algorithms such as C4.5, Naïve Bayes, One Rule, Bayesian Networks, PART, Ripper, K*, IBk, and Random tree for performing privacy preserving classification. To preserve privacy of the data to be classified, we applied input perturbation technique coming from differential privacy, and observed the relationship between the ɛ parameter values and accuracy of the classifiers. To our best knowledge, this article is the first study that analyzes the performances of the well‐known classification algorithms over differentially private data, and discovers which datasets are more suitable for privacy preserving classification when input perturbation is applied to provide data privacy. The classification algorithms are compared by using the differentially private versions of the well‐known datasets from the UCI repository. According to the experimental results, we observed that, as ɛ parameter value increases, better classification accuracies are achieved with lower privacy levels. When the classifiers are compared, Naïve Bayes classifier is the most successful method. The ɛ parameter should be greater than or equal to 2 (i.e., ɛ ≥2) to achieve cloud server is malicious and untrusted, sensitive data will satisfactory classification accuracies.","PeriodicalId":48970,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy preserving classification over differentially private data\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Zorarpacı, S. A. Özel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/widm.1399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy preserving data classification is an important research area in data mining field. The goal of a privacy preserving classification algorithm is to protect the sensitive information as much as possible, while providing satisfactory classification accuracy. Differential privacy is a strong privacy guarantee that enables privacy of sensitive data stored in a database by determining the ratio of sensitive information leakage with respect to an ɛ parameter. In this study, our aim is to investigate the classification performance of the state‐of‐the‐art classification algorithms such as C4.5, Naïve Bayes, One Rule, Bayesian Networks, PART, Ripper, K*, IBk, and Random tree for performing privacy preserving classification. To preserve privacy of the data to be classified, we applied input perturbation technique coming from differential privacy, and observed the relationship between the ɛ parameter values and accuracy of the classifiers. To our best knowledge, this article is the first study that analyzes the performances of the well‐known classification algorithms over differentially private data, and discovers which datasets are more suitable for privacy preserving classification when input perturbation is applied to provide data privacy. The classification algorithms are compared by using the differentially private versions of the well‐known datasets from the UCI repository. According to the experimental results, we observed that, as ɛ parameter value increases, better classification accuracies are achieved with lower privacy levels. When the classifiers are compared, Naïve Bayes classifier is the most successful method. The ɛ parameter should be greater than or equal to 2 (i.e., ɛ ≥2) to achieve cloud server is malicious and untrusted, sensitive data will satisfactory classification accuracies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1399\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

保护隐私的数据分类是数据挖掘领域的一个重要研究方向。隐私保护分类算法的目标是尽可能保护敏感信息,同时提供令人满意的分类精度。差分隐私是一种强大的隐私保障,通过确定敏感信息泄漏相对于某个参数的比例,实现数据库中存储的敏感数据的隐私性。在本研究中,我们的目的是研究C4.5、Naïve贝叶斯、One Rule、贝叶斯网络、PART、Ripper、K*、IBk和Random tree等最先进的分类算法在执行隐私保护分类方面的分类性能。为了保护待分类数据的隐私性,我们采用了来自差分隐私的输入扰动技术,并观察了参数值与分类器准确率之间的关系。据我们所知,本文是第一个分析已知分类算法在差分私有数据上的性能的研究,并发现当应用输入扰动来提供数据隐私时,哪些数据集更适合用于保护隐私的分类。通过使用UCI存储库中知名数据集的不同私有版本来比较分类算法。根据实验结果,我们观察到,随着参数值的增加,在较低的隐私级别下获得更好的分类精度。当分类器进行比较时,Naïve贝叶斯分类器是最成功的方法。其中,参数要大于等于2(即,参数要≥2),才能实现云服务器是恶意的、不可信的、敏感的数据将得到令人满意的分类精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy preserving classification over differentially private data
Privacy preserving data classification is an important research area in data mining field. The goal of a privacy preserving classification algorithm is to protect the sensitive information as much as possible, while providing satisfactory classification accuracy. Differential privacy is a strong privacy guarantee that enables privacy of sensitive data stored in a database by determining the ratio of sensitive information leakage with respect to an ɛ parameter. In this study, our aim is to investigate the classification performance of the state‐of‐the‐art classification algorithms such as C4.5, Naïve Bayes, One Rule, Bayesian Networks, PART, Ripper, K*, IBk, and Random tree for performing privacy preserving classification. To preserve privacy of the data to be classified, we applied input perturbation technique coming from differential privacy, and observed the relationship between the ɛ parameter values and accuracy of the classifiers. To our best knowledge, this article is the first study that analyzes the performances of the well‐known classification algorithms over differentially private data, and discovers which datasets are more suitable for privacy preserving classification when input perturbation is applied to provide data privacy. The classification algorithms are compared by using the differentially private versions of the well‐known datasets from the UCI repository. According to the experimental results, we observed that, as ɛ parameter value increases, better classification accuracies are achieved with lower privacy levels. When the classifiers are compared, Naïve Bayes classifier is the most successful method. The ɛ parameter should be greater than or equal to 2 (i.e., ɛ ≥2) to achieve cloud server is malicious and untrusted, sensitive data will satisfactory classification accuracies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goals of Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (WIREs DMKD) are multifaceted. Firstly, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of data mining and knowledge discovery by featuring ongoing reviews authored by leading researchers. Secondly, it seeks to highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the field by presenting articles from diverse perspectives, covering various application areas such as technology, business, healthcare, education, government, society, and culture. Thirdly, WIREs DMKD endeavors to keep pace with the rapid advancements in data mining and knowledge discovery through regular content updates. Lastly, the journal strives to promote active engagement in the field by presenting its accomplishments and challenges in an accessible manner to a broad audience. The content of WIREs DMKD is intended to benefit upper-level undergraduate and postgraduate students, teaching and research professors in academic programs, as well as scientists and research managers in industry.
期刊最新文献
Research on mining software repositories to facilitate refactoring Use of artificial intelligence algorithms to predict systemic diseases from retinal images The benefits and dangers of using machine learning to support making legal predictions Sports analytics review: Artificial intelligence applications, emerging technologies, and algorithmic perspective ExplainFix: Explainable spatially fixed deep networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1