重新排序信仰与科学:泰森扭转大逆转的计划

C. Barrigar
{"title":"重新排序信仰与科学:泰森扭转大逆转的计划","authors":"C. Barrigar","doi":"10.56315/pscf3-23barrigar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theologian Paul Tyson has published a new theology of science. His concern is to address \"the great reversal,\" whereby the early figures in natural philosophy held Christian faith as \"first truth\" and their scientific findings as \"second truth,\" but over the course of two-and-a-half centuries these became reversed—the findings of science became society's \"first truth\" and Christian faith became privatized \"second truth.\" Some Christians, particularly those in science-and-religion discussions today, have succumbed to this reversal, making reductionist-materialist science their operational first truth. Tyson critiques the latter, keying on proposals to reinterpret the Fall as nonhistorical. This review summarizes Tyson's argument, identifies valuable aspects to his proposal, and then offers a number of constructive critiques.","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-ordering Faith and Science: Tyson's Project to Reverse the Great Reversal\",\"authors\":\"C. Barrigar\",\"doi\":\"10.56315/pscf3-23barrigar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theologian Paul Tyson has published a new theology of science. His concern is to address \\\"the great reversal,\\\" whereby the early figures in natural philosophy held Christian faith as \\\"first truth\\\" and their scientific findings as \\\"second truth,\\\" but over the course of two-and-a-half centuries these became reversed—the findings of science became society's \\\"first truth\\\" and Christian faith became privatized \\\"second truth.\\\" Some Christians, particularly those in science-and-religion discussions today, have succumbed to this reversal, making reductionist-materialist science their operational first truth. Tyson critiques the latter, keying on proposals to reinterpret the Fall as nonhistorical. This review summarizes Tyson's argument, identifies valuable aspects to his proposal, and then offers a number of constructive critiques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf3-23barrigar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf3-23barrigar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神学家保罗·泰森出版了一本新的科学神学。他关注的是解决“大逆转”,即早期自然哲学人物将基督教信仰视为“第一真理”,将他们的科学发现视为“第二真理”,但在两个半世纪的过程中,这两者发生了逆转——科学发现成为社会的“第一真理”,基督教信仰成为私有化的“第二真理”。一些基督徒,特别是那些今天在科学与宗教讨论中的基督徒,已经屈服于这种逆转,使简化-唯物主义科学成为他们操作的第一真理。泰森对后者进行了批评,重点是将堕落重新解释为非历史性的提议。这篇综述总结了泰森的论点,确定了他的建议中有价值的方面,然后提出了一些建设性的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-ordering Faith and Science: Tyson's Project to Reverse the Great Reversal
Theologian Paul Tyson has published a new theology of science. His concern is to address "the great reversal," whereby the early figures in natural philosophy held Christian faith as "first truth" and their scientific findings as "second truth," but over the course of two-and-a-half centuries these became reversed—the findings of science became society's "first truth" and Christian faith became privatized "second truth." Some Christians, particularly those in science-and-religion discussions today, have succumbed to this reversal, making reductionist-materialist science their operational first truth. Tyson critiques the latter, keying on proposals to reinterpret the Fall as nonhistorical. This review summarizes Tyson's argument, identifies valuable aspects to his proposal, and then offers a number of constructive critiques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
57.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Digital Public Square: Christian Ethics in a Technological Society Real Structures and Divine Action Externalism: A Solution to Benacerraf's Problem Virtue and Artificial Intelligence Did the New Testament Authors Believe the Earth Is Flat? Modifying Our Genes: Theology, Science and “Playing God”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1