{"title":"从福柯的《事物的秩序》看欧洲人的心理、教育和健康思想框架","authors":"Carol Nash","doi":"10.20944/preprints202201.0420.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In European thought, the relationship among the fields of psychology, education, and health is both complex and obscured. Foucault’s acclaimed work, The Order of Things, offers a framework to evaluate their interconnection by identifying three distinct periods of European thought since the 16th century with respect to the ordering of phenomena—Renaissance, Classical and Modern. Theoretically dense and often difficult to decipher, the book’s categorization of language, value and being has been understandably underused, yet it provides deep insights into what have come to be known as psychology, education and health and remains invaluable in understanding the origin, limits and consequences of these fields. How Foucault’s analysis can be interpreted concerning the development of these areas as to each of the three periods of European thought is investigated. An approach based on narrative research appraises the analysis offered in the book. The results, presented for the first time in table form, compare these three periods, demonstrating a continuing practical value to Foucault’s insights. With the aid of the framework revealed by these tables, the boundaries and relationship of psychology, education and health become clear and their limitations—plus potential solutions to them—can be identified to mitigate anticipated negative consequences.","PeriodicalId":41517,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Histories","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for European Thought on Psychology, Education and Health Based on Foucault’s The Order of Things\",\"authors\":\"Carol Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.20944/preprints202201.0420.v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In European thought, the relationship among the fields of psychology, education, and health is both complex and obscured. Foucault’s acclaimed work, The Order of Things, offers a framework to evaluate their interconnection by identifying three distinct periods of European thought since the 16th century with respect to the ordering of phenomena—Renaissance, Classical and Modern. Theoretically dense and often difficult to decipher, the book’s categorization of language, value and being has been understandably underused, yet it provides deep insights into what have come to be known as psychology, education and health and remains invaluable in understanding the origin, limits and consequences of these fields. How Foucault’s analysis can be interpreted concerning the development of these areas as to each of the three periods of European thought is investigated. An approach based on narrative research appraises the analysis offered in the book. The results, presented for the first time in table form, compare these three periods, demonstrating a continuing practical value to Foucault’s insights. With the aid of the framework revealed by these tables, the boundaries and relationship of psychology, education and health become clear and their limitations—plus potential solutions to them—can be identified to mitigate anticipated negative consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Histories\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Histories\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202201.0420.v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202201.0420.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在欧洲人的思想中,心理学、教育和健康领域之间的关系既复杂又模糊。福柯广受赞誉的著作《事物的秩序》(The Order of Things)提供了一个框架,通过识别自16世纪以来欧洲思想在现象秩序方面的三个不同时期——文艺复兴时期、古典时期和现代时期——来评估它们之间的相互联系。这本书对语言、价值和存在的分类在理论上密集,往往难以解读,这一点可以理解,但它对心理学、教育和健康提供了深刻的见解,在理解这些领域的起源、限制和后果方面仍然是无价的。如何解释福柯的分析,关于这些领域的发展,作为三个时期的欧洲思想的研究。一种基于叙事研究的方法对书中的分析进行了评价。结果首次以表格的形式呈现,比较了这三个时期,展示了福柯的见解的持续实用价值。在这些表格所揭示的框架的帮助下,心理学、教育和健康的界限和关系变得清晰,它们的局限性——加上它们的潜在解决方案——可以被识别出来,以减轻预期的负面后果。
A Framework for European Thought on Psychology, Education and Health Based on Foucault’s The Order of Things
In European thought, the relationship among the fields of psychology, education, and health is both complex and obscured. Foucault’s acclaimed work, The Order of Things, offers a framework to evaluate their interconnection by identifying three distinct periods of European thought since the 16th century with respect to the ordering of phenomena—Renaissance, Classical and Modern. Theoretically dense and often difficult to decipher, the book’s categorization of language, value and being has been understandably underused, yet it provides deep insights into what have come to be known as psychology, education and health and remains invaluable in understanding the origin, limits and consequences of these fields. How Foucault’s analysis can be interpreted concerning the development of these areas as to each of the three periods of European thought is investigated. An approach based on narrative research appraises the analysis offered in the book. The results, presented for the first time in table form, compare these three periods, demonstrating a continuing practical value to Foucault’s insights. With the aid of the framework revealed by these tables, the boundaries and relationship of psychology, education and health become clear and their limitations—plus potential solutions to them—can be identified to mitigate anticipated negative consequences.