埃及儿童重度感音神经性听力损失中人工耳蜗受者与助听器使用者的结果测量。

M. Abd elhameed, N. Kamal, Ghada Khalil, Maha Bushnaq
{"title":"埃及儿童重度感音神经性听力损失中人工耳蜗受者与助听器使用者的结果测量。","authors":"M. Abd elhameed, N. Kamal, Ghada Khalil, Maha Bushnaq","doi":"10.21608/asmj.2023.307115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for the severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Candidacy criteria have expanded gradually due to technological developments and increasing experience. Main expansions include very young age, residual hearing, additional handicaps & special etiologies of deafness. Aim of the work: To compare the outcomes of children with bilateral severe to profound SNHL with cochlear implant versus children with severe SNHL with hearing aids. Patient and Methods : 60 children with age 5-15 years divided into 2 groups were included in the present study. Group I: 30 binaural HA users with bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss. Group II: 30 CI users with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Test battery of outcome measures (Arabic versions) were done to evaluate and compare outcome of both groups including measures for: audibility, aided speech recognition test using PBKG lists, perception of everyday sounds by MAIS questionnaire and language assessment using PLS 4 test. Results: Results showed that HA group scored better than CI group in aided speech recognition test by PBKG lists, MAIS questionnaire and PLS 4 test. CI group got better aided thresholds. Conclusion: Children with severe hearing loss using hearing aids have the potential to receive sufficient auditory information from conventional hearing aids to acquire age-appropriate spoken communication.","PeriodicalId":7450,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OUTCOME MEASURES OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS VERSUS HEARING AID USERS IN SEVERE SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS AMONG EGYPTIAN CHILDREN.\",\"authors\":\"M. Abd elhameed, N. Kamal, Ghada Khalil, Maha Bushnaq\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asmj.2023.307115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: Cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for the severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Candidacy criteria have expanded gradually due to technological developments and increasing experience. Main expansions include very young age, residual hearing, additional handicaps & special etiologies of deafness. Aim of the work: To compare the outcomes of children with bilateral severe to profound SNHL with cochlear implant versus children with severe SNHL with hearing aids. Patient and Methods : 60 children with age 5-15 years divided into 2 groups were included in the present study. Group I: 30 binaural HA users with bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss. Group II: 30 CI users with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Test battery of outcome measures (Arabic versions) were done to evaluate and compare outcome of both groups including measures for: audibility, aided speech recognition test using PBKG lists, perception of everyday sounds by MAIS questionnaire and language assessment using PLS 4 test. Results: Results showed that HA group scored better than CI group in aided speech recognition test by PBKG lists, MAIS questionnaire and PLS 4 test. CI group got better aided thresholds. Conclusion: Children with severe hearing loss using hearing aids have the potential to receive sufficient auditory information from conventional hearing aids to acquire age-appropriate spoken communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2023.307115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2023.307115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工耳蜗植入术是重度至重度双侧感音神经性听力损失的标准治疗方法。由于技术的发展和经验的增加,候选标准逐渐扩大。主要扩展包括非常小的年龄,残余听力,额外的障碍和耳聋的特殊病因。研究目的:比较双侧重度至深度SNHL患儿植入人工耳蜗与佩戴助听器的重度SNHL患儿的预后。患者与方法:将60例5 ~ 15岁儿童分为两组。第一组:30名双耳HA使用者,伴有双侧严重感音神经性听力损失。第二组:30名双侧重度至重度听力损失的CI使用者。结果测量的测试组(阿拉伯语版本)进行评估和比较两组的结果,包括测量:可听性,使用PBKG列表的辅助语音识别测试,MAIS问卷的日常声音感知和使用PLS 4测试的语言评估。结果:通过PBKG表、MAIS问卷和PLS 4检验,HA组在辅助语音识别测试中的得分优于CI组。CI组辅助阈值较好。结论:使用助听器的重度听力损失儿童有可能从传统助听器中获得足够的听觉信息,从而获得与年龄相适应的口语交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OUTCOME MEASURES OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS VERSUS HEARING AID USERS IN SEVERE SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS AMONG EGYPTIAN CHILDREN.
: Background: Cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for the severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Candidacy criteria have expanded gradually due to technological developments and increasing experience. Main expansions include very young age, residual hearing, additional handicaps & special etiologies of deafness. Aim of the work: To compare the outcomes of children with bilateral severe to profound SNHL with cochlear implant versus children with severe SNHL with hearing aids. Patient and Methods : 60 children with age 5-15 years divided into 2 groups were included in the present study. Group I: 30 binaural HA users with bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss. Group II: 30 CI users with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Test battery of outcome measures (Arabic versions) were done to evaluate and compare outcome of both groups including measures for: audibility, aided speech recognition test using PBKG lists, perception of everyday sounds by MAIS questionnaire and language assessment using PLS 4 test. Results: Results showed that HA group scored better than CI group in aided speech recognition test by PBKG lists, MAIS questionnaire and PLS 4 test. CI group got better aided thresholds. Conclusion: Children with severe hearing loss using hearing aids have the potential to receive sufficient auditory information from conventional hearing aids to acquire age-appropriate spoken communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serum Erythroferrone, a Biomarker of Erythropoietic Activity in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Fibromyalgia and Depression in Egyptian Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study of Impact on Physical Functional Status Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) – A Review Prevalence and Factors Associated with Medication non-adherence among diabetic patients Attending at Menoufia University Hospitals Proportion and Determinants of Fibromyalgia in a Sample of Egyptians with Higher Education (Physicians and Non-physicians): A Comparative Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1