纯粹的快乐:清洁与十四世纪性解放

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS Exemplaria Classica Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2021.2020992
James Staples
{"title":"纯粹的快乐:清洁与十四世纪性解放","authors":"James Staples","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2021.2020992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although the critical tradition reads the Middle English poem Cleanness as a homophobic endorsement of heteronormativity, this article insists that the fourteenth-century poem contributes to a much more interesting moment in the history of sexuality. Cleanness includes one of the most shocking celebrations of sexual pleasure from the Middle Ages: without any reference to procreation, God exhorts Abraham to participate in the “play of paramours,” whereby a lover and his beloved discover through their passionate love the visio Dei, bringing about paradise on earth. Reading the poet’s celebration of pleasure alongside Audre Lorde’s conception of the erotic, this article discovers in Cleanness a discourse of liberation that sought to realize a more equitable, less violent, world through a sexual pleasure that feels like ecstatic union with God. The poem contributes to a counter-discourse from the end of the Middle Ages that sought in contemplative practices a recuperation of primal “cleanness” and a licensing of pleasure. Such claims to cleanness, however, often resulted in justifications for rapacious violence. The poet maintains the real possibility of recovering this lost pleasure, but he insists on the risk inherent in claims to cleanness. By walking this line between pleasure and hedonism, the poet acknowledges a much more nuanced medieval moralization of sexual pleasure.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"7 1","pages":"40 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pure Pleasure: Cleanness and Fourteenth-Century Sexual Liberation\",\"authors\":\"James Staples\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10412573.2021.2020992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although the critical tradition reads the Middle English poem Cleanness as a homophobic endorsement of heteronormativity, this article insists that the fourteenth-century poem contributes to a much more interesting moment in the history of sexuality. Cleanness includes one of the most shocking celebrations of sexual pleasure from the Middle Ages: without any reference to procreation, God exhorts Abraham to participate in the “play of paramours,” whereby a lover and his beloved discover through their passionate love the visio Dei, bringing about paradise on earth. Reading the poet’s celebration of pleasure alongside Audre Lorde’s conception of the erotic, this article discovers in Cleanness a discourse of liberation that sought to realize a more equitable, less violent, world through a sexual pleasure that feels like ecstatic union with God. The poem contributes to a counter-discourse from the end of the Middle Ages that sought in contemplative practices a recuperation of primal “cleanness” and a licensing of pleasure. Such claims to cleanness, however, often resulted in justifications for rapacious violence. The poet maintains the real possibility of recovering this lost pleasure, but he insists on the risk inherent in claims to cleanness. By walking this line between pleasure and hedonism, the poet acknowledges a much more nuanced medieval moralization of sexual pleasure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exemplaria Classica\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exemplaria Classica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2021.2020992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2021.2020992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管批评传统将中世纪英语诗歌《洁净》解读为对异性恋规范的同性恋憎恶,但本文坚持认为,这首14世纪的诗歌在性史上贡献了一个更有趣的时刻。《洁净》包含了中世纪以来最令人震惊的性欢愉庆典之一:在没有提及生育的情况下,上帝劝诫亚伯拉罕参与“情人的游戏”,一个情人和他心爱的人通过他们激情的爱发现了上帝的远景,带来了人间的天堂。阅读诗人对快乐的庆祝以及奥德丽·洛德对色情的概念,本文发现在《洁净》中,一种关于解放的话语,试图通过一种与上帝狂喜结合的性快乐来实现一个更公平、更少暴力的世界。这首诗促成了中世纪末期的反话语,在沉思的实践中寻求原始“清洁”的恢复和快乐的许可。然而,这种清洁的主张往往导致为贪婪的暴力辩护。诗人坚持认为恢复这种失去的快乐是可能的,但他坚持主张清洁所固有的风险。通过游走在快乐和享乐主义之间,诗人承认了中世纪对性快乐的一种微妙得多的道德化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pure Pleasure: Cleanness and Fourteenth-Century Sexual Liberation
ABSTRACT Although the critical tradition reads the Middle English poem Cleanness as a homophobic endorsement of heteronormativity, this article insists that the fourteenth-century poem contributes to a much more interesting moment in the history of sexuality. Cleanness includes one of the most shocking celebrations of sexual pleasure from the Middle Ages: without any reference to procreation, God exhorts Abraham to participate in the “play of paramours,” whereby a lover and his beloved discover through their passionate love the visio Dei, bringing about paradise on earth. Reading the poet’s celebration of pleasure alongside Audre Lorde’s conception of the erotic, this article discovers in Cleanness a discourse of liberation that sought to realize a more equitable, less violent, world through a sexual pleasure that feels like ecstatic union with God. The poem contributes to a counter-discourse from the end of the Middle Ages that sought in contemplative practices a recuperation of primal “cleanness” and a licensing of pleasure. Such claims to cleanness, however, often resulted in justifications for rapacious violence. The poet maintains the real possibility of recovering this lost pleasure, but he insists on the risk inherent in claims to cleanness. By walking this line between pleasure and hedonism, the poet acknowledges a much more nuanced medieval moralization of sexual pleasure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tra Iporchemi e Parteni (Pindaro, Hyporch. F9 Recchia) Il Paratesto in Catullo: alcune riflessioni su un saggio recente Pelasgus Sacca. Una nuova testimonianza su Sacada di Argo e alcune osservazioni sulla fortuna umanistica dei Deipnosofisti di Ateneo Cynthia e lo statuto dinamico dell’elegia, tra dream narrative, arte figurativa e modelli epici Olympica Pindarica (I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1