机器人辅助胆囊切除术:现状与未来应用

Simran Chandhok, Phillip Chao, Jonathan Koea, Sanket Srinivasa
{"title":"机器人辅助胆囊切除术:现状与未来应用","authors":"Simran Chandhok,&nbsp;Phillip Chao,&nbsp;Jonathan Koea,&nbsp;Sanket Srinivasa","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2022.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) is increasingly common. However, its exact role remains undefined, with multiport conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) being regarded as the established gold standard. This review aims to provide an overview of the evidence for RC and to define its current and future role. A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Medline databases to identify relevant articles published between 1994 and February 2022. The evidence obtained was summarised in a narrative style. Greater emphasis was placed on recent 10-year articles and studies of higher methodological quality. RC is noninferior to LC. The robotic platform facilitates the application of minimally invasive surgery in a way conventional laparoscopy cannot. LC remains appropriate for the majority of patients requiring cholecystectomy. The advantages of RC include inherent technical benefits, facilitating the learning of new surgical technology and its potential to reduce the risk of open conversion and bile leakage in certain populations (Mirizzi syndrome, complicated calculous disease, chronic liver disease and possibly malignancy). It also has increasing applicability to related biliary surgery. The limitations include cost, loss of tactile feedback and the learning curve associated with initial implementation. Future applications of robotic surgical systems include utilisation in difficult cholecystectomy, cases of biliary malignancy, telerobotic surgery and telementoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000469/pdfft?md5=9b1f6a505045a3aef6ab5e97824d0bf3&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000469-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy: Current status and future application\",\"authors\":\"Simran Chandhok,&nbsp;Phillip Chao,&nbsp;Jonathan Koea,&nbsp;Sanket Srinivasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lers.2022.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) is increasingly common. However, its exact role remains undefined, with multiport conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) being regarded as the established gold standard. This review aims to provide an overview of the evidence for RC and to define its current and future role. A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Medline databases to identify relevant articles published between 1994 and February 2022. The evidence obtained was summarised in a narrative style. Greater emphasis was placed on recent 10-year articles and studies of higher methodological quality. RC is noninferior to LC. The robotic platform facilitates the application of minimally invasive surgery in a way conventional laparoscopy cannot. LC remains appropriate for the majority of patients requiring cholecystectomy. The advantages of RC include inherent technical benefits, facilitating the learning of new surgical technology and its potential to reduce the risk of open conversion and bile leakage in certain populations (Mirizzi syndrome, complicated calculous disease, chronic liver disease and possibly malignancy). It also has increasing applicability to related biliary surgery. The limitations include cost, loss of tactile feedback and the learning curve associated with initial implementation. Future applications of robotic surgical systems include utilisation in difficult cholecystectomy, cases of biliary malignancy, telerobotic surgery and telementoring.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000469/pdfft?md5=9b1f6a505045a3aef6ab5e97824d0bf3&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000469-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

机器人辅助胆囊切除术(RC)越来越普遍。然而,其确切的作用仍不明确,多口常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)被认为是既定的金标准。本综述旨在提供RC的证据概述,并定义其当前和未来的作用。对PubMed和Medline数据库进行文献检索,以确定1994年至2022年2月期间发表的相关文章。获得的证据以叙述的方式进行了总结。更强调最近10年的文章和方法学质量较高的研究。RC不逊于LC。机器人平台促进了微创手术的应用,这是传统腹腔镜无法做到的。LC仍然适用于大多数需要胆囊切除术的患者。RC的优势包括固有的技术优势,促进了新的外科技术的学习,并有可能降低某些人群(Mirizzi综合征、复杂的结石疾病、慢性肝病和可能的恶性肿瘤)的开放转换和胆汁泄漏的风险。在相关胆道手术中的适用性也越来越强。限制因素包括成本、触觉反馈的缺失以及与初始执行相关的学习曲线。机器人手术系统的未来应用包括在困难的胆囊切除术、胆道恶性肿瘤病例、远程机器人手术和远程监护中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy: Current status and future application

Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) is increasingly common. However, its exact role remains undefined, with multiport conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) being regarded as the established gold standard. This review aims to provide an overview of the evidence for RC and to define its current and future role. A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Medline databases to identify relevant articles published between 1994 and February 2022. The evidence obtained was summarised in a narrative style. Greater emphasis was placed on recent 10-year articles and studies of higher methodological quality. RC is noninferior to LC. The robotic platform facilitates the application of minimally invasive surgery in a way conventional laparoscopy cannot. LC remains appropriate for the majority of patients requiring cholecystectomy. The advantages of RC include inherent technical benefits, facilitating the learning of new surgical technology and its potential to reduce the risk of open conversion and bile leakage in certain populations (Mirizzi syndrome, complicated calculous disease, chronic liver disease and possibly malignancy). It also has increasing applicability to related biliary surgery. The limitations include cost, loss of tactile feedback and the learning curve associated with initial implementation. Future applications of robotic surgical systems include utilisation in difficult cholecystectomy, cases of biliary malignancy, telerobotic surgery and telementoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Use of indocyanine green fluorescence for triple gallbladder cholecystectomy: A case report Helicobacter pylori infection may result in poor gastric cleanliness in magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy examination: A single-center retrospective study Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1