迈克尔·菲尔德:颓废的现代人

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Women-A Cultural Review Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09574042.2022.2129546
Isobel Armstrong
{"title":"迈克尔·菲尔德:颓废的现代人","authors":"Isobel Armstrong","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2022.2129546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This important collection of essays marks a defining moment in Michael Field studies. It constitutes a declaration that Michael Field, pseudonym of the aunt and niece, Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper, collaborators and incestuous lovers, is now firmly established as a major poet. A sign of this is the research depth, adventurous thinking and precision of the work here – Catherine Maxwell, for instance, meticulously names each of the specific species of roses beloved of the pair, and quotes Bradley’s horticultural learning, ‘the presence on our desk of Marshall Niel roses, with snow-green shadows’. Strikingly, all these essays open up in detail for the first time the many affiliations and formations to which Field belonged, going far beyond the known friendships with Pater, Wilde and Berenson, and in the process moving to texts well outside the customarily read works. Kate Thomas reminds us of Edward Carpenter’s pullulating plant world and its affinity with Field’s green sexual aesthetic of vegetable and plant life (‘Vegetable Love: Michael Field’s Queer Ecology’). Havelock Ellis and Field’s intense engagement, charged with the predicament of rape by a god, with the forgotten poet, Thomas Ashe, is another affiliation explored by Margaret D. Stetz (‘ “As She Feels a GodWithin”: Michael Field and Inspiration’). Ana Vadillo points to Field’s association with the book artist, Joseph Zaelnsdorf, and Alexander Stuart Murray, Keeper of Greek and Roman antiquities at the British Museum (‘Sculpture, Poetics, Marble Books: Casting Michael Field’). In her ‘Sister Arts: Michael Field and Mary Costelloe’, Sarah Parker explores Field’s relationship with Berenson’s mistress, rather than with the art critic himself, and points to further significant female friendships – Vernon Lee, Maud Cruttwell, Alice Trusted. Joseph Bristow names not only Wilde but Nietzsche (‘Michael Field’s “Unwomanly Audacities”: Attila, My Attila, Sexual Modernity, and the London Stage’), while Catherine Maxwell reminds us of the friendship with another queer partnership, Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon. The last five essays venture into Field’s Catholicism, ground rarely and Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, ed. Sarah Parker and Ana Parejo Vadillo. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2019, £72.00 hardback, ISBN 9780821424018","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"336 - 339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Michael Field: Decadent Moderns\",\"authors\":\"Isobel Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09574042.2022.2129546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This important collection of essays marks a defining moment in Michael Field studies. It constitutes a declaration that Michael Field, pseudonym of the aunt and niece, Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper, collaborators and incestuous lovers, is now firmly established as a major poet. A sign of this is the research depth, adventurous thinking and precision of the work here – Catherine Maxwell, for instance, meticulously names each of the specific species of roses beloved of the pair, and quotes Bradley’s horticultural learning, ‘the presence on our desk of Marshall Niel roses, with snow-green shadows’. Strikingly, all these essays open up in detail for the first time the many affiliations and formations to which Field belonged, going far beyond the known friendships with Pater, Wilde and Berenson, and in the process moving to texts well outside the customarily read works. Kate Thomas reminds us of Edward Carpenter’s pullulating plant world and its affinity with Field’s green sexual aesthetic of vegetable and plant life (‘Vegetable Love: Michael Field’s Queer Ecology’). Havelock Ellis and Field’s intense engagement, charged with the predicament of rape by a god, with the forgotten poet, Thomas Ashe, is another affiliation explored by Margaret D. Stetz (‘ “As She Feels a GodWithin”: Michael Field and Inspiration’). Ana Vadillo points to Field’s association with the book artist, Joseph Zaelnsdorf, and Alexander Stuart Murray, Keeper of Greek and Roman antiquities at the British Museum (‘Sculpture, Poetics, Marble Books: Casting Michael Field’). In her ‘Sister Arts: Michael Field and Mary Costelloe’, Sarah Parker explores Field’s relationship with Berenson’s mistress, rather than with the art critic himself, and points to further significant female friendships – Vernon Lee, Maud Cruttwell, Alice Trusted. Joseph Bristow names not only Wilde but Nietzsche (‘Michael Field’s “Unwomanly Audacities”: Attila, My Attila, Sexual Modernity, and the London Stage’), while Catherine Maxwell reminds us of the friendship with another queer partnership, Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon. The last five essays venture into Field’s Catholicism, ground rarely and Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, ed. Sarah Parker and Ana Parejo Vadillo. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2019, £72.00 hardback, ISBN 9780821424018\",\"PeriodicalId\":54053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women-A Cultural Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"336 - 339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women-A Cultural Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2129546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2129546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本重要的文集标志着迈克尔·菲尔德研究的一个决定性时刻。它宣告迈克尔·菲尔德,姨妈和侄女凯瑟琳·布拉德利和伊迪丝·库珀的笔名,合作者和乱伦的恋人,现在已经确立了他作为主要诗人的地位。这一点的一个标志是研究的深度、冒险的思维和工作的精确——例如,凯瑟琳·麦克斯韦(Catherine Maxwell)一丝不苟地命名了这对夫妇所喜爱的每一种特定的玫瑰,并引用了布拉德利的园艺知识,“马歇尔·尼尔(Marshall Niel)玫瑰出现在我们的桌子上,有雪绿色的阴影”。引人注目的是,所有这些文章首次详细地揭示了菲尔德所属的许多从属关系和组织,远远超出了与佩特、王尔德和贝伦森的已知友谊,并在此过程中转移到传统阅读作品之外的文本。凯特·托马斯让我们想起了爱德华·卡彭特(Edward Carpenter)的植物世界,以及它与菲尔德对蔬菜和植物生命的绿色性美学的亲缘关系(《蔬菜之爱:迈克尔·菲尔德的酷儿生态学》)。哈夫洛克·埃利斯和菲尔德与被遗忘的诗人托马斯·阿什(Thomas Ashe)密切接触,被指控被上帝强奸的困境,这是玛格丽特·d·斯泰兹(Margaret D. Stetz)探索的另一种联系(《当她感到内心有上帝:迈克尔·菲尔德与灵感》)。Ana Vadillo指出Field与书籍艺术家Joseph Zaelnsdorf以及大英博物馆希腊和罗马文物管理员Alexander Stuart Murray(“雕塑,诗学,大理石书籍:铸造Michael Field”)的联系。在她的《姐妹艺术:迈克尔·菲尔德和玛丽·科斯特洛》一书中,莎拉·帕克探讨了菲尔德与贝伦森情妇的关系,而不是与这位艺术评论家本人的关系,并指出了更重要的女性友谊——弗农·李、莫德·克鲁特韦尔、爱丽丝·托斯特。约瑟夫·布里斯托不仅提到了王尔德,还提到了尼采(迈克尔·菲尔德的《非女性的大胆行为:阿提拉,我的阿提拉,性现代性和伦敦舞台》),而凯瑟琳·麦克斯韦尔则让我们想起了与另一个同性恋伙伴查尔斯·里基茨和查尔斯·香农的友谊。最后五篇文章探讨了菲尔德的天主教信仰,以及莎拉·帕克和安娜·帕雷霍·瓦迪略主编的《迈克尔·菲尔德:颓废的现代人》。雅典:俄亥俄大学出版社,2019,精装本72.00英镑,ISBN 9780821424018
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Michael Field: Decadent Moderns
This important collection of essays marks a defining moment in Michael Field studies. It constitutes a declaration that Michael Field, pseudonym of the aunt and niece, Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper, collaborators and incestuous lovers, is now firmly established as a major poet. A sign of this is the research depth, adventurous thinking and precision of the work here – Catherine Maxwell, for instance, meticulously names each of the specific species of roses beloved of the pair, and quotes Bradley’s horticultural learning, ‘the presence on our desk of Marshall Niel roses, with snow-green shadows’. Strikingly, all these essays open up in detail for the first time the many affiliations and formations to which Field belonged, going far beyond the known friendships with Pater, Wilde and Berenson, and in the process moving to texts well outside the customarily read works. Kate Thomas reminds us of Edward Carpenter’s pullulating plant world and its affinity with Field’s green sexual aesthetic of vegetable and plant life (‘Vegetable Love: Michael Field’s Queer Ecology’). Havelock Ellis and Field’s intense engagement, charged with the predicament of rape by a god, with the forgotten poet, Thomas Ashe, is another affiliation explored by Margaret D. Stetz (‘ “As She Feels a GodWithin”: Michael Field and Inspiration’). Ana Vadillo points to Field’s association with the book artist, Joseph Zaelnsdorf, and Alexander Stuart Murray, Keeper of Greek and Roman antiquities at the British Museum (‘Sculpture, Poetics, Marble Books: Casting Michael Field’). In her ‘Sister Arts: Michael Field and Mary Costelloe’, Sarah Parker explores Field’s relationship with Berenson’s mistress, rather than with the art critic himself, and points to further significant female friendships – Vernon Lee, Maud Cruttwell, Alice Trusted. Joseph Bristow names not only Wilde but Nietzsche (‘Michael Field’s “Unwomanly Audacities”: Attila, My Attila, Sexual Modernity, and the London Stage’), while Catherine Maxwell reminds us of the friendship with another queer partnership, Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon. The last five essays venture into Field’s Catholicism, ground rarely and Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, ed. Sarah Parker and Ana Parejo Vadillo. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2019, £72.00 hardback, ISBN 9780821424018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women-A Cultural Review
Women-A Cultural Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
About Our Contributors Living with the Ancestors Feminist Depictions of Coercive Control in ‘Domestic Noir’: Ilsa Evans’s Broken (2007) and Kathryn Heyman’s Storm and Grace (2017) Colonized Brown Motherhood: Em and the Big Hoom, Imelda and Indian Mothering Introduction: Imagining and Reimagining Emotional Labour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1