教练哲学而不是教练哲学:一些概念澄清

IF 2.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sports Coaching Review Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21640629.2021.1995261
Chris Hughes
{"title":"教练哲学而不是教练哲学:一些概念澄清","authors":"Chris Hughes","doi":"10.1080/21640629.2021.1995261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper applies some central thoughts and ways of doing philosophy from the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein. I will draw attention to several of the tempting, yet potentially misleading ideas that concern some sports coaching scholars. Reflecting upon the corpus of research in the area, and the sociology of sports coaching in particular, the paper will argue that such inquiry relies far too heavily upon empirical methods and thus raises further, and deeper, conceptual confusions. Inspired by Wittgenstein’s “therapeutic” and “descriptive” approach to philosophy and the work of Peter Winch, the paper will expose some features of the concepts of “behaviour” and “habitus”. In the spirit of Wittgenstein, these ideas are not offered as new additions to the ever-increasing palette of theory or methods on offer. The paper offers no new knowledge in this sense but instead, more modestly, a perspicuous description of some conceptual matters.","PeriodicalId":43190,"journal":{"name":"Sports Coaching Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"108 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophy for coaching rather than philosophy of coaching: some conceptual clarifications\",\"authors\":\"Chris Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21640629.2021.1995261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper applies some central thoughts and ways of doing philosophy from the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein. I will draw attention to several of the tempting, yet potentially misleading ideas that concern some sports coaching scholars. Reflecting upon the corpus of research in the area, and the sociology of sports coaching in particular, the paper will argue that such inquiry relies far too heavily upon empirical methods and thus raises further, and deeper, conceptual confusions. Inspired by Wittgenstein’s “therapeutic” and “descriptive” approach to philosophy and the work of Peter Winch, the paper will expose some features of the concepts of “behaviour” and “habitus”. In the spirit of Wittgenstein, these ideas are not offered as new additions to the ever-increasing palette of theory or methods on offer. The paper offers no new knowledge in this sense but instead, more modestly, a perspicuous description of some conceptual matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1995261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Coaching Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1995261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文运用维特根斯坦著作中的一些中心思想和哲学研究方法。我将提请注意一些体育教练学者关注的几个诱人但可能具有误导性的想法。反思该领域的研究,尤其是体育教练社会学,本文将认为,这种调查过于依赖于经验方法,从而引发了进一步、更深层次的概念混乱。受维特根斯坦的“治疗”和“描述”的哲学方法以及彼得·温奇的工作的启发,本文将揭示“行为”和“习惯”概念的一些特征。在维特根斯坦的精神下,这些想法并不是作为不断增加的理论或方法的新补充而提供的。这篇论文在这个意义上没有提供新的知识,相反,更谦虚地,对一些概念性问题的清晰描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Philosophy for coaching rather than philosophy of coaching: some conceptual clarifications
ABSTRACT This paper applies some central thoughts and ways of doing philosophy from the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein. I will draw attention to several of the tempting, yet potentially misleading ideas that concern some sports coaching scholars. Reflecting upon the corpus of research in the area, and the sociology of sports coaching in particular, the paper will argue that such inquiry relies far too heavily upon empirical methods and thus raises further, and deeper, conceptual confusions. Inspired by Wittgenstein’s “therapeutic” and “descriptive” approach to philosophy and the work of Peter Winch, the paper will expose some features of the concepts of “behaviour” and “habitus”. In the spirit of Wittgenstein, these ideas are not offered as new additions to the ever-increasing palette of theory or methods on offer. The paper offers no new knowledge in this sense but instead, more modestly, a perspicuous description of some conceptual matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Coaching Review
Sports Coaching Review HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
19.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Coach development as assemblage: mobilising assemblage thinking to examine coach learning within an endurance-running coach development intravention Adding texture to the Art of constraints-led coaching: a request for more research-informed guidelines “You can stay now, you are trusted”: navigating qualitative fieldwork in sport coaching Sport pedagogy in played-form practice in soccer: the articulation between contents and contexts Exhausted by design: coaching, care, and sleep in the NCAA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1