匈牙利走向经济改革

IF 0.6 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs Pub Date : 1965-10-01 DOI:10.1177/0974928419650403
B. Csikos-nagy
{"title":"匈牙利走向经济改革","authors":"B. Csikos-nagy","doi":"10.1177/0974928419650403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After World War II, Hungary expropriated private capital and instituted a policy under which the small producers united in co-operatives. Hungary has thus a socialist economy which retains the categories of a market economy, as for instance money, price, credit, profit, etc. Hungary built up her socialist economy according to the Soviet pattern. She introduced annual and five-year planning and an operative management based on compulsory plan indicators. She did so, among other reasons, because the economic mechanism of the Soviet Union had proved a very effective means to rapid industrialisation. We did not go , into a thorough examination as to whether the existing differences in social and, primarily, in economic conditions had set specific demands for economic mangement. We started out—at that time—from the hypothesis that the historically evolved concrete system of planning is the only conceivable system of socialist economy. But the forms of organisation, the methods of planning and the principles of economic regulation which emerged in the socialist countries after World War H reflected the economic mechanism of a given but short period. It has become increasingly obvious that those who regard the practice of one given period as the necessary and unalterable expression of socialist production and of planned economy, forego the possibility of developing a socialist society founded on maximum advantages. Therefore, a scientific discussion of the socialist economic mechanism had to come to the recognition that the economy of a socialist country can be built up in different ways. The argument about the various possible economic models of socialism reaches back to the early 'Fifties. At that time, the centralized control of the Yugolsav industry through direct plan instructions had been abolished, the 'self-management by workers' was introduced, together with economic instruments by the aid of which industrial activity was to be influenced, in order to ensure the implementation of the national economic plan.","PeriodicalId":43647,"journal":{"name":"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs","volume":"2 1","pages":"387 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1965-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Economic Reform in Hungary\",\"authors\":\"B. Csikos-nagy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0974928419650403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After World War II, Hungary expropriated private capital and instituted a policy under which the small producers united in co-operatives. Hungary has thus a socialist economy which retains the categories of a market economy, as for instance money, price, credit, profit, etc. Hungary built up her socialist economy according to the Soviet pattern. She introduced annual and five-year planning and an operative management based on compulsory plan indicators. She did so, among other reasons, because the economic mechanism of the Soviet Union had proved a very effective means to rapid industrialisation. We did not go , into a thorough examination as to whether the existing differences in social and, primarily, in economic conditions had set specific demands for economic mangement. We started out—at that time—from the hypothesis that the historically evolved concrete system of planning is the only conceivable system of socialist economy. But the forms of organisation, the methods of planning and the principles of economic regulation which emerged in the socialist countries after World War H reflected the economic mechanism of a given but short period. It has become increasingly obvious that those who regard the practice of one given period as the necessary and unalterable expression of socialist production and of planned economy, forego the possibility of developing a socialist society founded on maximum advantages. Therefore, a scientific discussion of the socialist economic mechanism had to come to the recognition that the economy of a socialist country can be built up in different ways. The argument about the various possible economic models of socialism reaches back to the early 'Fifties. At that time, the centralized control of the Yugolsav industry through direct plan instructions had been abolished, the 'self-management by workers' was introduced, together with economic instruments by the aid of which industrial activity was to be influenced, in order to ensure the implementation of the national economic plan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"387 - 401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419650403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Quarterly-A Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419650403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二次世界大战后,匈牙利没收了私人资本,并制定了一项政策,根据该政策,小生产者联合起来组成合作社。因此,匈牙利是社会主义经济,它保留了市场经济的范畴,如货币、价格、信用、利润等。匈牙利按照苏联模式建立了社会主义经济。她引入了年度和五年计划以及基于强制性计划指标的运营管理。她这样做的原因之一是,苏联的经济机制已被证明是快速工业化的一种非常有效的手段。我们没有深入研究社会条件,主要是经济条件方面的现有差异是否对经济管理提出了具体要求。当时,我们的出发点是这样一个假设,即历史上发展起来的具体计划体系是社会主义经济的唯一可能体系。但是,第二次世界大战后社会主义国家出现的组织形式、计划方法和经济调节原则,反映的是一个特定而短暂时期的经济机制。那些把一定时期的实践看作是社会主义生产和计划经济的必然的和不变的表现的人,就放弃了发展以最大利益为基础的社会主义社会的可能性,这一点日益明显。因此,对社会主义经济机制的科学探讨必须认识到,社会主义国家的经济建设可以有多种方式。关于社会主义各种可能的经济模式的争论可以追溯到50年代早期。当时,通过直接计划指示对南斯拉夫工业进行集中控制的做法已被废除,实行了"工人自我管理",并采用了经济手段,通过这些手段来影响工业活动,以确保国家经济计划的执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Economic Reform in Hungary
After World War II, Hungary expropriated private capital and instituted a policy under which the small producers united in co-operatives. Hungary has thus a socialist economy which retains the categories of a market economy, as for instance money, price, credit, profit, etc. Hungary built up her socialist economy according to the Soviet pattern. She introduced annual and five-year planning and an operative management based on compulsory plan indicators. She did so, among other reasons, because the economic mechanism of the Soviet Union had proved a very effective means to rapid industrialisation. We did not go , into a thorough examination as to whether the existing differences in social and, primarily, in economic conditions had set specific demands for economic mangement. We started out—at that time—from the hypothesis that the historically evolved concrete system of planning is the only conceivable system of socialist economy. But the forms of organisation, the methods of planning and the principles of economic regulation which emerged in the socialist countries after World War H reflected the economic mechanism of a given but short period. It has become increasingly obvious that those who regard the practice of one given period as the necessary and unalterable expression of socialist production and of planned economy, forego the possibility of developing a socialist society founded on maximum advantages. Therefore, a scientific discussion of the socialist economic mechanism had to come to the recognition that the economy of a socialist country can be built up in different ways. The argument about the various possible economic models of socialism reaches back to the early 'Fifties. At that time, the centralized control of the Yugolsav industry through direct plan instructions had been abolished, the 'self-management by workers' was introduced, together with economic instruments by the aid of which industrial activity was to be influenced, in order to ensure the implementation of the national economic plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
India’s G20 Presidency: Implications for the Latin American Region in the Framework of the Global South Between Rewards and Risks: India as Host of the 2023 G20 Summit Indo-Iran Relations: Impact of Third-party Influence Assessment of Possible Economic Alignment Between G20 Nations with Special Focus on India, G7 and G12: A General Equilibrium Analysis Walking a Tightrope: Assessing India’s Engagements with G20 and BRICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1