V. Cammalleri, G. Idone, Joseph Cosma, M. M. Marino, A. Mauceri, G. Stifano, S. Muscoli, F. Boffi, Francesca De Persis, P. de Vico, F. Versaci, M. Di Luozzo, F. Romeo
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置入术中的兰博氏赘生物:栓塞事件的发生率和风险。","authors":"V. Cammalleri, G. Idone, Joseph Cosma, M. M. Marino, A. Mauceri, G. Stifano, S. Muscoli, F. Boffi, Francesca De Persis, P. de Vico, F. Versaci, M. Di Luozzo, F. Romeo","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05482-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe role of aortic valve Lambl's excrescence (LEs) in determining ischemic events has not been well clarified, but they can represent a potential embolic source during procedures with catheter/device manipulation through the aortic valve. Aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of LEs and the rate of embolism in patients with aortic valve stenosis scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).\n\n\nMETHODS\nOur population was divided into two groups, named LEs and no-LEs. In each group, the rate of cerebral embolic events was assessed, as well as other TAVI-related complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn our study population 28 patients (37%) had aortic strands and 48 (63%) did not have them. A cerebral protection device was used in 4 patients of LEs group (14% vs 0, p=0.03). The mean procedural time was similar in the two groups: 50±19 and 55±26 minutes (p=0.38) in LEs and no-LEs groups, respectively. The device success was achieved in 96% of LEs and 88% of no-LEs patients (p=0.37). Two patients of no-LEs group died during the procedure. Major complications were observed in both groups without any significant differences. Only one case of stroke occurred in the population without LEs (0 LEs vs 2% no-LEs, 0.78). No cases of peripheral embolism were observed.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn our population the observation of LEs is not uncommon. Despite the presumed high risk of embolism, we have not observed an increase in the rate of cerebral ischemic events or other TAVI related complications in patients with LEs.","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lambl's excrescence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: prevalence and risk of embolic events.\",\"authors\":\"V. Cammalleri, G. Idone, Joseph Cosma, M. M. Marino, A. Mauceri, G. Stifano, S. Muscoli, F. Boffi, Francesca De Persis, P. de Vico, F. Versaci, M. Di Luozzo, F. Romeo\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05482-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe role of aortic valve Lambl's excrescence (LEs) in determining ischemic events has not been well clarified, but they can represent a potential embolic source during procedures with catheter/device manipulation through the aortic valve. Aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of LEs and the rate of embolism in patients with aortic valve stenosis scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nOur population was divided into two groups, named LEs and no-LEs. In each group, the rate of cerebral embolic events was assessed, as well as other TAVI-related complications.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIn our study population 28 patients (37%) had aortic strands and 48 (63%) did not have them. A cerebral protection device was used in 4 patients of LEs group (14% vs 0, p=0.03). The mean procedural time was similar in the two groups: 50±19 and 55±26 minutes (p=0.38) in LEs and no-LEs groups, respectively. The device success was achieved in 96% of LEs and 88% of no-LEs patients (p=0.37). Two patients of no-LEs group died during the procedure. Major complications were observed in both groups without any significant differences. Only one case of stroke occurred in the population without LEs (0 LEs vs 2% no-LEs, 0.78). No cases of peripheral embolism were observed.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nIn our population the observation of LEs is not uncommon. Despite the presumed high risk of embolism, we have not observed an increase in the rate of cerebral ischemic events or other TAVI related complications in patients with LEs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05482-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05482-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:主动脉瓣兰博氏增生(LEs)在确定缺血事件中的作用尚未得到很好的阐明,但在通过主动脉瓣的导管/装置操作的过程中,它们可能是一个潜在的栓塞源。我们的研究目的是评估经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的LEs患病率和栓塞率。方法将人群分为LEs组和no-LEs组。在每组中,评估脑栓塞事件的发生率以及其他tavi相关并发症。结果在我们的研究人群中,28例(37%)患者有主动脉束,48例(63%)患者无主动脉束。LEs组4例患者使用脑保护装置(14% vs 0, p=0.03)。两组的平均手术时间相似:有LEs组为50±19分钟,无LEs组为55±26分钟(p=0.38)。96%的LEs患者和88%的无LEs患者成功使用该装置(p=0.37)。无les组2例患者在手术过程中死亡。两组主要并发症发生率无明显差异。在没有LEs的人群中,只有1例卒中发生(0例LEs vs 2例无LEs, 0.78)。未发现外周栓塞病例。结论在我国人群中,LEs的观察并不少见。尽管假定栓塞的风险很高,但我们尚未观察到LEs患者脑缺血事件或其他TAVI相关并发症的发生率增加。
Lambl's excrescence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: prevalence and risk of embolic events.
BACKGROUND
The role of aortic valve Lambl's excrescence (LEs) in determining ischemic events has not been well clarified, but they can represent a potential embolic source during procedures with catheter/device manipulation through the aortic valve. Aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of LEs and the rate of embolism in patients with aortic valve stenosis scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
METHODS
Our population was divided into two groups, named LEs and no-LEs. In each group, the rate of cerebral embolic events was assessed, as well as other TAVI-related complications.
RESULTS
In our study population 28 patients (37%) had aortic strands and 48 (63%) did not have them. A cerebral protection device was used in 4 patients of LEs group (14% vs 0, p=0.03). The mean procedural time was similar in the two groups: 50±19 and 55±26 minutes (p=0.38) in LEs and no-LEs groups, respectively. The device success was achieved in 96% of LEs and 88% of no-LEs patients (p=0.37). Two patients of no-LEs group died during the procedure. Major complications were observed in both groups without any significant differences. Only one case of stroke occurred in the population without LEs (0 LEs vs 2% no-LEs, 0.78). No cases of peripheral embolism were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
In our population the observation of LEs is not uncommon. Despite the presumed high risk of embolism, we have not observed an increase in the rate of cerebral ischemic events or other TAVI related complications in patients with LEs.