当政治驱动项目创新

J. Zamir, Khaled Al-Sayed, Ibrahim Elbadour, S. A. Jaber
{"title":"当政治驱动项目创新","authors":"J. Zamir, Khaled Al-Sayed, Ibrahim Elbadour, S. A. Jaber","doi":"10.20849/jed.v2i2.412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a discussion of the evaluation of an educational intervention introduced by the Ministry ofEducation in response to social and political pressure. The social protest that started in Israel during the summerof 2011 addressed a variety of social issues, lasted through 2016 and led to the Ministry of Education decision toopen a new training programme for teachers. One of the aims of the intervention was to provide an additionaladult in classrooms of more than 32 pupils. To meet this goal, the Ministry required third-year student teachers towork at schools co-teaching with the classroom teacher three days a week. Twenty-five institutions of higherlearning representing 81 cities and communities responded “yes” to the call for a pilot programme. Using mixedmethods, the evaluation of the pilot was attentive to the voices of all participants and revealed the complexity ofthe programme. The conclusions and suggestions of the evaluation were supposed to feed into a policy decision,but unfortunately did not. Through a presentation of the evaluation of the programme and the issues it raised, thearticle contributes a significant example of how political constraints prevent institutions from dealing withevaluation conclusions and unintended outcomes of programs.","PeriodicalId":29977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Politics Drive Program Innovation\",\"authors\":\"J. Zamir, Khaled Al-Sayed, Ibrahim Elbadour, S. A. Jaber\",\"doi\":\"10.20849/jed.v2i2.412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a discussion of the evaluation of an educational intervention introduced by the Ministry ofEducation in response to social and political pressure. The social protest that started in Israel during the summerof 2011 addressed a variety of social issues, lasted through 2016 and led to the Ministry of Education decision toopen a new training programme for teachers. One of the aims of the intervention was to provide an additionaladult in classrooms of more than 32 pupils. To meet this goal, the Ministry required third-year student teachers towork at schools co-teaching with the classroom teacher three days a week. Twenty-five institutions of higherlearning representing 81 cities and communities responded “yes” to the call for a pilot programme. Using mixedmethods, the evaluation of the pilot was attentive to the voices of all participants and revealed the complexity ofthe programme. The conclusions and suggestions of the evaluation were supposed to feed into a policy decision,but unfortunately did not. Through a presentation of the evaluation of the programme and the issues it raised, thearticle contributes a significant example of how political constraints prevent institutions from dealing withevaluation conclusions and unintended outcomes of programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v2i2.412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v2i2.412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了教育部为应对社会和政治压力而引入的一项教育干预措施的评估。2011年夏天在以色列开始的社会抗议活动解决了各种社会问题,持续到2016年,并导致教育部决定为教师开设一个新的培训项目。干预的目的之一是在超过32名学生的教室里提供一个额外的成年人。为了实现这一目标,教育部要求三年级实习教师每周三天在学校与任课教师共同教学。代表81个城市和社区的25所高等院校对试点项目的呼吁表示赞同。采用混合方法,对试点的评估注意到所有参与者的声音,并揭示了项目的复杂性。评估的结论和建议本应纳入一项政策决定,但不幸的是没有。通过对该计划的评估及其提出的问题的介绍,本文提供了一个重要的例子,说明政治约束如何阻止机构处理评估结论和计划的意外结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When Politics Drive Program Innovation
This article presents a discussion of the evaluation of an educational intervention introduced by the Ministry ofEducation in response to social and political pressure. The social protest that started in Israel during the summerof 2011 addressed a variety of social issues, lasted through 2016 and led to the Ministry of Education decision toopen a new training programme for teachers. One of the aims of the intervention was to provide an additionaladult in classrooms of more than 32 pupils. To meet this goal, the Ministry required third-year student teachers towork at schools co-teaching with the classroom teacher three days a week. Twenty-five institutions of higherlearning representing 81 cities and communities responded “yes” to the call for a pilot programme. Using mixedmethods, the evaluation of the pilot was attentive to the voices of all participants and revealed the complexity ofthe programme. The conclusions and suggestions of the evaluation were supposed to feed into a policy decision,but unfortunately did not. Through a presentation of the evaluation of the programme and the issues it raised, thearticle contributes a significant example of how political constraints prevent institutions from dealing withevaluation conclusions and unintended outcomes of programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychogenic Pain in the Mind of Gymnasts Caught Between Glory and Frustration Receptive Vocabulary Size of Omani Post-Basic Education Graduates A Corporate Mentoring Program Cross-Cultural Experience and the Impact on Self-Identity for Students From an Urban Community Reflections on Implementing Participatory Action Research in Engineering Effect of Environmental Factors on Learning Quality Among Adult College Students: The Mediation Role of Learning Motivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1