基于风险差异量表上敏感性参数的因果效应的新界限

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Causal Inference Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jci-2021-0024
A. Sjölander, O. Hössjer
{"title":"基于风险差异量表上敏感性参数的因果效应的新界限","authors":"A. Sjölander, O. Hössjer","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unmeasured confounding is an important threat to the validity of observational studies. A common way to deal with unmeasured confounding is to compute bounds for the causal effect of interest, that is, a range of values that is guaranteed to include the true effect, given the observed data. Recently, bounds have been proposed that are based on sensitivity parameters, which quantify the degree of unmeasured confounding on the risk ratio scale. These bounds can be used to compute an E-value, that is, the degree of confounding required to explain away an observed association, on the risk ratio scale. We complement and extend this previous work by deriving analogous bounds, based on sensitivity parameters on the risk difference scale. We show that our bounds can also be used to compute an E-value, on the risk difference scale. We compare our novel bounds with previous bounds through a real data example and a simulation study.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"191 1","pages":"190 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel bounds for causal effects based on sensitivity parameters on the risk difference scale\",\"authors\":\"A. Sjölander, O. Hössjer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jci-2021-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Unmeasured confounding is an important threat to the validity of observational studies. A common way to deal with unmeasured confounding is to compute bounds for the causal effect of interest, that is, a range of values that is guaranteed to include the true effect, given the observed data. Recently, bounds have been proposed that are based on sensitivity parameters, which quantify the degree of unmeasured confounding on the risk ratio scale. These bounds can be used to compute an E-value, that is, the degree of confounding required to explain away an observed association, on the risk ratio scale. We complement and extend this previous work by deriving analogous bounds, based on sensitivity parameters on the risk difference scale. We show that our bounds can also be used to compute an E-value, on the risk difference scale. We compare our novel bounds with previous bounds through a real data example and a simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Causal Inference\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Causal Inference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Causal Inference","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

未测量的混杂是对观察性研究有效性的一个重要威胁。处理不可测量的混杂的一种常用方法是计算感兴趣的因果效应的界限,即在给定观测数据的情况下,保证包含真实效应的值范围。最近,人们提出了基于敏感性参数的界限,它量化了风险比尺度上未测量的混杂程度。这些界限可以用来计算e值,即在风险比尺度上解释观察到的关联所需的混淆程度。我们通过推导基于风险差异尺度上的敏感性参数的类似边界来补充和扩展先前的工作。我们表明,我们的界限也可以用于计算风险差尺度上的e值。通过一个实际的数据例子和仿真研究,比较了我们的新边界和以前的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel bounds for causal effects based on sensitivity parameters on the risk difference scale
Abstract Unmeasured confounding is an important threat to the validity of observational studies. A common way to deal with unmeasured confounding is to compute bounds for the causal effect of interest, that is, a range of values that is guaranteed to include the true effect, given the observed data. Recently, bounds have been proposed that are based on sensitivity parameters, which quantify the degree of unmeasured confounding on the risk ratio scale. These bounds can be used to compute an E-value, that is, the degree of confounding required to explain away an observed association, on the risk ratio scale. We complement and extend this previous work by deriving analogous bounds, based on sensitivity parameters on the risk difference scale. We show that our bounds can also be used to compute an E-value, on the risk difference scale. We compare our novel bounds with previous bounds through a real data example and a simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Causal Inference
Journal of Causal Inference Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
86 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Causal Inference (JCI) publishes papers on theoretical and applied causal research across the range of academic disciplines that use quantitative tools to study causality.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Boolean relationships in Configurational Comparative Methods Comparison of open-source software for producing directed acyclic graphs. LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PRESENTATION OF MATERIALS ON ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “WHEN ENGLISH RINGS A BELL” BASED ON BSNP Heterogeneous interventional effects with multiple mediators: Semiparametric and nonparametric approaches Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1