{"title":"物质性和没有精神的空洞:布兰肖和德里达之间的阿托","authors":"Noelia Billi","doi":"10.7764/AISTH.61.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolA partir de las lecturas realizadas por Blanchot y Derrida sobre la obra de Artaud, sostenemos aqui que el descentramiento antropico de la escritura permite repensar un materialismo (no dialectico y no sustancial) que hace justicia a la organolepsia impersonal del arte toda vez que no la reduce al horizonte representativo humano. En el recorrido que proponemos, la logica que Blanchot (en Le livre a venir) y Derrida (en Forcener le subjectile) recuperan de la obra artaudiana implica una recon\u0001guracion de la nocion de super\u0001cie y fuerza que, concomitantemente, expone un nuevo planteo ontologico y estetico. Dicha propuesta revela la necesidad de una distancia con respecto al horizonte moderno para acoger la potencia inorganica de los materiales sin expropiarlos de su animacion y, a la vez, reivindicar lo viviente sin plegarlo a las condiciones de lo humano. EnglishTrough Blanchot’s and Derrida’s reading of Artaud’s work, this article argues that an anthropic decentering of writing enables the rede\u0001nition of a non-dialectical and nonsubstantial materialism which does justice to the impersonal and organoleptic character of art, given that it does not reduce it to the human representative horizon. \u0002e conceptual path we follow intends to point out that Blanchot (on Le livre a venir) and Derrida (on Forcener le subjectile) retrieve a certain logic from Artaud’s works which implies a recon\u0001guration of the notion of surface and concomitantly forces a new ontological and aesthetic approach. \u0002e latter reveals the need to maintain a distance from the modern horizon in order to o\u0003er a space for the materials’ inorganic power without depriving it of animation and, at the same time, to vindicate the living without yielding it to human requirements.","PeriodicalId":43414,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Materialidad y agujeros sin espíritu: Artaud entre Blanchot y Derrida\",\"authors\":\"Noelia Billi\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/AISTH.61.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolA partir de las lecturas realizadas por Blanchot y Derrida sobre la obra de Artaud, sostenemos aqui que el descentramiento antropico de la escritura permite repensar un materialismo (no dialectico y no sustancial) que hace justicia a la organolepsia impersonal del arte toda vez que no la reduce al horizonte representativo humano. En el recorrido que proponemos, la logica que Blanchot (en Le livre a venir) y Derrida (en Forcener le subjectile) recuperan de la obra artaudiana implica una recon\\u0001guracion de la nocion de super\\u0001cie y fuerza que, concomitantemente, expone un nuevo planteo ontologico y estetico. Dicha propuesta revela la necesidad de una distancia con respecto al horizonte moderno para acoger la potencia inorganica de los materiales sin expropiarlos de su animacion y, a la vez, reivindicar lo viviente sin plegarlo a las condiciones de lo humano. EnglishTrough Blanchot’s and Derrida’s reading of Artaud’s work, this article argues that an anthropic decentering of writing enables the rede\\u0001nition of a non-dialectical and nonsubstantial materialism which does justice to the impersonal and organoleptic character of art, given that it does not reduce it to the human representative horizon. \\u0002e conceptual path we follow intends to point out that Blanchot (on Le livre a venir) and Derrida (on Forcener le subjectile) retrieve a certain logic from Artaud’s works which implies a recon\\u0001guration of the notion of surface and concomitantly forces a new ontological and aesthetic approach. \\u0002e latter reveals the need to maintain a distance from the modern horizon in order to o\\u0003er a space for the materials’ inorganic power without depriving it of animation and, at the same time, to vindicate the living without yielding it to human requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"9-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/AISTH.61.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/AISTH.61.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从读数Blanchot于西班牙语和Artaud Derrida这出戏,我们这里认为偏心antropico唯物可考虑书法(不dialectico大)和不正义的organolepsia代名词的艺术而不是减少到地平线代表人类。行程的逻辑实现的,可以证明他是Blanchot(自由)和Derrida(来Forcener subjectile)从他的作品artaudiana意味着recon guracion nocion的超级 cie和强度,同时公开了一个新的布局ontologico estetico。这一提议揭示了与现代地平线保持距离的必要性,以欢迎材料的无机力量,而不剥夺它们的生命,同时,要求有生命的东西,而不使它屈服于人类的条件。EnglishTrough Blanchot ' s and Derrida ' s reading of Artaud ' s work,这条argues that an anthropic decentering of writing其次the rede nition of a non-dialectical and nonsubstantial materialism which本身公正to the代词和organoleptic查阅of art,给予她并不reduce it to the human代表地平线。概念和path we按照听证会to point out that Blanchot (on -他自由来and Derrida (on Forcener subjectile) retrieve一定logic, from Artaud’s works which implies a recon guration of the notion of surface and concomitantly a new ontological力量与aesthetic办法。和后一reveals the需要用户a distance from the现代地平线in order to或呃a space for the materials‘inorganic power without depriving it of animation and at the same time to vindicate the living without yielding it to human requirements。
Materialidad y agujeros sin espíritu: Artaud entre Blanchot y Derrida
espanolA partir de las lecturas realizadas por Blanchot y Derrida sobre la obra de Artaud, sostenemos aqui que el descentramiento antropico de la escritura permite repensar un materialismo (no dialectico y no sustancial) que hace justicia a la organolepsia impersonal del arte toda vez que no la reduce al horizonte representativo humano. En el recorrido que proponemos, la logica que Blanchot (en Le livre a venir) y Derrida (en Forcener le subjectile) recuperan de la obra artaudiana implica una reconguracion de la nocion de supercie y fuerza que, concomitantemente, expone un nuevo planteo ontologico y estetico. Dicha propuesta revela la necesidad de una distancia con respecto al horizonte moderno para acoger la potencia inorganica de los materiales sin expropiarlos de su animacion y, a la vez, reivindicar lo viviente sin plegarlo a las condiciones de lo humano. EnglishTrough Blanchot’s and Derrida’s reading of Artaud’s work, this article argues that an anthropic decentering of writing enables the redenition of a non-dialectical and nonsubstantial materialism which does justice to the impersonal and organoleptic character of art, given that it does not reduce it to the human representative horizon. e conceptual path we follow intends to point out that Blanchot (on Le livre a venir) and Derrida (on Forcener le subjectile) retrieve a certain logic from Artaud’s works which implies a reconguration of the notion of surface and concomitantly forces a new ontological and aesthetic approach. e latter reveals the need to maintain a distance from the modern horizon in order to oer a space for the materials’ inorganic power without depriving it of animation and, at the same time, to vindicate the living without yielding it to human requirements.
期刊介绍:
The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.