{"title":"亲属关系、冲突与跨国协调:19世纪西门子家族的全球化战略","authors":"Martin Lutz, D. Sabean","doi":"10.1080/03071022.2022.2044206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the dynamic and frequently conflictual dimension of establishing transnational coordination in the Siemens kin group during an age of nationalism and imperialism. Recent historiography has emphasised the role of kinship in nineteenth-century globalisation. Scholars point to the role of entrepreneurial families in establishing transnational networks as a means to expand their business beyond regional or national settings. However, this literature considers kinship a priori as a foundation of entrepreneurial success and does not take the constructed character of kin relations into account. Three brothers and their families are at the core of this study: Werner in Berlin, William in London and Carl in St Petersburg. The analysis shows how the vast transnational Siemens enterprise was built on distinctly modern notions of kinship, when the originally Berlin-based firm expanded into a complex transnational entity united by a shared identity of familial connection. In this process, notions of kin were constantly reassessed and renegotiated, centring around the question of how ‘German’ the Siemens family and their enterprises were perceived to be. We argue that the ability to mediate these conflicts was crucial to the persistence, expansion and intergenerational continuity of Siemens’s globalisation strategy, where family and business logics were deeply intertwined.","PeriodicalId":21866,"journal":{"name":"Social History","volume":"1 1","pages":"141 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinship, conflict and transnational coordination: the Siemens family’s globalisation strategies in the nineteenth century\",\"authors\":\"Martin Lutz, D. Sabean\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03071022.2022.2044206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article analyses the dynamic and frequently conflictual dimension of establishing transnational coordination in the Siemens kin group during an age of nationalism and imperialism. Recent historiography has emphasised the role of kinship in nineteenth-century globalisation. Scholars point to the role of entrepreneurial families in establishing transnational networks as a means to expand their business beyond regional or national settings. However, this literature considers kinship a priori as a foundation of entrepreneurial success and does not take the constructed character of kin relations into account. Three brothers and their families are at the core of this study: Werner in Berlin, William in London and Carl in St Petersburg. The analysis shows how the vast transnational Siemens enterprise was built on distinctly modern notions of kinship, when the originally Berlin-based firm expanded into a complex transnational entity united by a shared identity of familial connection. In this process, notions of kin were constantly reassessed and renegotiated, centring around the question of how ‘German’ the Siemens family and their enterprises were perceived to be. We argue that the ability to mediate these conflicts was crucial to the persistence, expansion and intergenerational continuity of Siemens’s globalisation strategy, where family and business logics were deeply intertwined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2022.2044206\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2022.2044206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kinship, conflict and transnational coordination: the Siemens family’s globalisation strategies in the nineteenth century
ABSTRACT This article analyses the dynamic and frequently conflictual dimension of establishing transnational coordination in the Siemens kin group during an age of nationalism and imperialism. Recent historiography has emphasised the role of kinship in nineteenth-century globalisation. Scholars point to the role of entrepreneurial families in establishing transnational networks as a means to expand their business beyond regional or national settings. However, this literature considers kinship a priori as a foundation of entrepreneurial success and does not take the constructed character of kin relations into account. Three brothers and their families are at the core of this study: Werner in Berlin, William in London and Carl in St Petersburg. The analysis shows how the vast transnational Siemens enterprise was built on distinctly modern notions of kinship, when the originally Berlin-based firm expanded into a complex transnational entity united by a shared identity of familial connection. In this process, notions of kin were constantly reassessed and renegotiated, centring around the question of how ‘German’ the Siemens family and their enterprises were perceived to be. We argue that the ability to mediate these conflicts was crucial to the persistence, expansion and intergenerational continuity of Siemens’s globalisation strategy, where family and business logics were deeply intertwined.
期刊介绍:
For more than thirty years, Social History has published scholarly work of consistently high quality, without restrictions of period or geography. Social History is now minded to develop further the scope of the journal in content and to seek further experiment in terms of format. The editorial object remains unchanged - to enable discussion, to provoke argument, and to create space for criticism and scholarship. In recent years the content of Social History has expanded to include a good deal more European and American work as well as, increasingly, work from and about Africa, South Asia and Latin America.