{"title":"小麦种子处理对黑森蝇和蚜虫的防治效果,1992;","authors":"J. W. Chapin, James S. Thomas","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Three rates of NTN 33893 240 FS seed treatment were compared to a standard of Disyston 15 G in-furrow for suppression of HF, aphids, and barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) symptoms. The test was planted 13 Nov on a Marlboro sandy loam in Barnwell County, SC. The experimental design was a RCB with 5 replicates. The experimental unit was a plot 50 x 5.3 ft (8 rows on 8 inch spacing). Granular Disyston was placed in-furrow with electric Gandy applicators. Seed treatments were made by adding 40-ml total volume dilutions of 6 lb of seed and thoroughly mixing in a plastic bag. HF counts were taken by randomly uprooting 10 plants from each of 4 plots (40 plants/treatment) and examining them in the laboratory for larvae and puparia. Aphids were sampled on 3 Feb by counting aphids on 2, random 6-inch samples per plot in 4 replicates (8/treatment). Aphid counts on 9 Mar were taken by shaking wheat plants from 6 inches of row into a sheet metal sampler, (2 samples/e.u., 8 samples/treatment) which extended beyond the full length of the plants. Specimens which could not be field identified were returned to the laboratory for microscopic examination. BYDV ratings were determined by counting the number of symptomatic flag leaves from four 50-ft rows (200 row ft) per plot (1,000 row ft/treatment). These were converted to % based on 2, random 1 m culm counts per plot. Yields were taken by harvesting the middle 6 rows with an Almaco plot combine.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wheat Seed-Treatment Efficacy Against Hessian Fly and Aphids, 1992:\",\"authors\":\"J. W. Chapin, James S. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iat/18.1.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Three rates of NTN 33893 240 FS seed treatment were compared to a standard of Disyston 15 G in-furrow for suppression of HF, aphids, and barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) symptoms. The test was planted 13 Nov on a Marlboro sandy loam in Barnwell County, SC. The experimental design was a RCB with 5 replicates. The experimental unit was a plot 50 x 5.3 ft (8 rows on 8 inch spacing). Granular Disyston was placed in-furrow with electric Gandy applicators. Seed treatments were made by adding 40-ml total volume dilutions of 6 lb of seed and thoroughly mixing in a plastic bag. HF counts were taken by randomly uprooting 10 plants from each of 4 plots (40 plants/treatment) and examining them in the laboratory for larvae and puparia. Aphids were sampled on 3 Feb by counting aphids on 2, random 6-inch samples per plot in 4 replicates (8/treatment). Aphid counts on 9 Mar were taken by shaking wheat plants from 6 inches of row into a sheet metal sampler, (2 samples/e.u., 8 samples/treatment) which extended beyond the full length of the plants. Specimens which could not be field identified were returned to the laboratory for microscopic examination. BYDV ratings were determined by counting the number of symptomatic flag leaves from four 50-ft rows (200 row ft) per plot (1,000 row ft/treatment). These were converted to % based on 2, random 1 m culm counts per plot. Yields were taken by harvesting the middle 6 rows with an Almaco plot combine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
比较了NTN 33893 240 FS种子处理与Disyston 15g垄作对照对HF、蚜虫和大麦黄矮病毒(BYDV)症状的抑制效果。试验于11月13日在南卡罗来纳州巴恩威尔县万宝路砂壤土上种植。试验设计为RCB, 5个重复。实验单元是一块50 x 5.3英尺(8行,8英寸间距)的地块。粒状Disyston用电动甘迪涂抹器放入犁沟中。种子处理是通过加入40毫升的总体积稀释的6磅种子,并在塑料袋中彻底混合。每4个样地(每处理40株)随机拔除10株,并在实验室检查其幼虫和蛹虫,以测定HF计数。2月3日采集蚜虫,每小区随机抽取2个6英寸样本,分4个重复(8个/处理)。3月9日,将每排6英寸的小麦植株摇入金属片取样器(2个样本/e.u),进行蚜虫计数。(8个样品/处理),超出了植株的全长。无法现场鉴定的标本被送回实验室进行显微镜检查。BYDV评级是通过计算每个地块4行50英尺(200行英尺)(1,000行英尺/处理)的症状旗叶数量来确定的。这些数据根据每个地块随机的1百万株数转换为%。采用Almaco地块联合收割机收割中间6行作物。
Wheat Seed-Treatment Efficacy Against Hessian Fly and Aphids, 1992:
Three rates of NTN 33893 240 FS seed treatment were compared to a standard of Disyston 15 G in-furrow for suppression of HF, aphids, and barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) symptoms. The test was planted 13 Nov on a Marlboro sandy loam in Barnwell County, SC. The experimental design was a RCB with 5 replicates. The experimental unit was a plot 50 x 5.3 ft (8 rows on 8 inch spacing). Granular Disyston was placed in-furrow with electric Gandy applicators. Seed treatments were made by adding 40-ml total volume dilutions of 6 lb of seed and thoroughly mixing in a plastic bag. HF counts were taken by randomly uprooting 10 plants from each of 4 plots (40 plants/treatment) and examining them in the laboratory for larvae and puparia. Aphids were sampled on 3 Feb by counting aphids on 2, random 6-inch samples per plot in 4 replicates (8/treatment). Aphid counts on 9 Mar were taken by shaking wheat plants from 6 inches of row into a sheet metal sampler, (2 samples/e.u., 8 samples/treatment) which extended beyond the full length of the plants. Specimens which could not be field identified were returned to the laboratory for microscopic examination. BYDV ratings were determined by counting the number of symptomatic flag leaves from four 50-ft rows (200 row ft) per plot (1,000 row ft/treatment). These were converted to % based on 2, random 1 m culm counts per plot. Yields were taken by harvesting the middle 6 rows with an Almaco plot combine.