西班牙版精神分裂症患者短功能量表(FAST)的验证

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.01.006
Eva Maria Lujan-Lujan , Maria Angeles Garcia-Leon , Elena Rodriguez-Cano , Sergi Huertas-Martinez , Juan Roldan-Merino , Montserrat Puig-Llobet , Maria Dolores Miguel-Ruiz , Raymond Salvador , Eduard Vieta , Edith Pomarol-Clotet
{"title":"西班牙版精神分裂症患者短功能量表(FAST)的验证","authors":"Eva Maria Lujan-Lujan ,&nbsp;Maria Angeles Garcia-Leon ,&nbsp;Elena Rodriguez-Cano ,&nbsp;Sergi Huertas-Martinez ,&nbsp;Juan Roldan-Merino ,&nbsp;Montserrat Puig-Llobet ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Miguel-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Raymond Salvador ,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta ,&nbsp;Edith Pomarol-Clotet","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Functional impairment in schizophrenia is one of the main features of the disorder and implies a great impact on the patient's quality of life. The brief functioning assessment scale (FAST), originally validated in bipolar disorder, has also been validated for its application in other mental disorders. However, we only found one study on the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version in schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FAST in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A total of 226 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were evaluated by mean the FAST, the GAF and the self-care requirements scale (ERA). Scale properties were analyzed in terms of internal consistency, inter-observer agreement and test–retest reliability. Convergent validity with the GAF and ERA scales was also analyzed, as well as construct validity by means of a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the total scale, the results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha of .87), as well as good inter-observer (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.86) and test–retest (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.77) agreement. Concurrent validity with the GAF scale was discrete (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.32; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) and with the ERA scale was moderate (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.50; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). CFA showed an internal structure that matched the six factors proposed by the original scale, with a good level of item saturation for each factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FAST scale showed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity in its Spanish version for its application in patients with schizophrenia. It can be considered as a good tool to assess different areas of functional impairment in clinical practice and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21391,"journal":{"name":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validación de la versión española de la Escala de funcionamiento breve (FAST) en pacientes diagnosticados de esquizofrenia\",\"authors\":\"Eva Maria Lujan-Lujan ,&nbsp;Maria Angeles Garcia-Leon ,&nbsp;Elena Rodriguez-Cano ,&nbsp;Sergi Huertas-Martinez ,&nbsp;Juan Roldan-Merino ,&nbsp;Montserrat Puig-Llobet ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Miguel-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Raymond Salvador ,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta ,&nbsp;Edith Pomarol-Clotet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Functional impairment in schizophrenia is one of the main features of the disorder and implies a great impact on the patient's quality of life. The brief functioning assessment scale (FAST), originally validated in bipolar disorder, has also been validated for its application in other mental disorders. However, we only found one study on the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version in schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FAST in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A total of 226 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were evaluated by mean the FAST, the GAF and the self-care requirements scale (ERA). Scale properties were analyzed in terms of internal consistency, inter-observer agreement and test–retest reliability. Convergent validity with the GAF and ERA scales was also analyzed, as well as construct validity by means of a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the total scale, the results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha of .87), as well as good inter-observer (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.86) and test–retest (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.77) agreement. Concurrent validity with the GAF scale was discrete (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.32; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) and with the ERA scale was moderate (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.50; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). CFA showed an internal structure that matched the six factors proposed by the original scale, with a good level of item saturation for each factor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FAST scale showed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity in its Spanish version for its application in patients with schizophrenia. It can be considered as a good tool to assess different areas of functional impairment in clinical practice and research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989122000271\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989122000271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症的功能障碍是该疾病的主要特征之一,对患者的生活质量有很大影响。简短功能评估量表(FAST)最初在双相情感障碍中得到验证,也被证实可用于其他精神障碍。然而,我们只发现了一项关于巴西版精神分裂症的可靠性和有效性的研究。本研究的目的是分析精神分裂症患者的西班牙语版FAST的心理测量特性。材料与方法对226例精神分裂症患者采用FAST、GAF和自我护理要求量表(ERA)进行平均评估。量表性质从内部一致性、观察者间一致性和重测信度等方面进行分析。对GAF和ERA量表的收敛效度进行了分析,并通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对结构效度进行了分析。结果总量表结果具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.87)、良好的观察者间一致性(ICC = 0.86)和重测一致性(ICC = 0.77)。与GAF量表的并发效度是离散的(r = - 0.32;P & lt;.001),与ERA量表比较为中度(r = .50;P & lt;措施)。CFA显示了一个与原始量表提出的六个因素相匹配的内部结构,每个因素的项目饱和度都很好。结论FAST量表西班牙文版在精神分裂症患者中的应用具有良好的信度和效度。在临床实践和研究中,它可以被认为是评估不同领域功能损伤的一个很好的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validación de la versión española de la Escala de funcionamiento breve (FAST) en pacientes diagnosticados de esquizofrenia

Introduction

Functional impairment in schizophrenia is one of the main features of the disorder and implies a great impact on the patient's quality of life. The brief functioning assessment scale (FAST), originally validated in bipolar disorder, has also been validated for its application in other mental disorders. However, we only found one study on the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version in schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FAST in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Material and methods

A total of 226 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were evaluated by mean the FAST, the GAF and the self-care requirements scale (ERA). Scale properties were analyzed in terms of internal consistency, inter-observer agreement and test–retest reliability. Convergent validity with the GAF and ERA scales was also analyzed, as well as construct validity by means of a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).

Results

For the total scale, the results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha of .87), as well as good inter-observer (ICC = .86) and test–retest (ICC = .77) agreement. Concurrent validity with the GAF scale was discrete (r = −.32; P < .001) and with the ERA scale was moderate (r = .50; P < .001). CFA showed an internal structure that matched the six factors proposed by the original scale, with a good level of item saturation for each factor.

Conclusions

The FAST scale showed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity in its Spanish version for its application in patients with schizophrenia. It can be considered as a good tool to assess different areas of functional impairment in clinical practice and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health (SJPMH), incorporated into ISSN 1888-9891, is the official scientific publication of the Spanish Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health. The journal focuses on studying mental illnesses, their pathological processes, and their psychosocial consequences, and aims to disseminate scientific advances in all areas related to mental health and illness. SJPMH accepts unpublished works on psychiatry and mental health, including their medical and social implications. The journal provides space for research in the biological, clinical, and psychosocial fields. Manuscripts undergo peer-review by external reviewers before being accepted for publication. SJPMH is indexed in Index Medicus/Medline, IBECS, Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, and Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Schizophrenia and the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review from the biomedical perspective. Volume alterations of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with schizophrenia and persistent auditory hallucinations. Deep brain stimulation and digital monitoring for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A case series. Koro-like syndrome in Huntington's disease. Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown on a population with serious mental illness. A prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1