{"title":"软件质量运动的假设和困难","authors":"Onur Demirörs","doi":"10.1109/EURMIC.1997.617234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The context of software quality movement determines the boundaries of \"change\" for software development organizations. In this paper, we analyze the context of software quality movement in terms of its assumptions and difficulties. In the light of research in software quality movement and analogous research in the business management field, we outline a complementary approach to resolve some of these difficulties.","PeriodicalId":100495,"journal":{"name":"Euromicro Newsletter","volume":"11 1","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assumptions and difficulties of software quality movement\",\"authors\":\"Onur Demirörs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EURMIC.1997.617234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The context of software quality movement determines the boundaries of \\\"change\\\" for software development organizations. In this paper, we analyze the context of software quality movement in terms of its assumptions and difficulties. In the light of research in software quality movement and analogous research in the business management field, we outline a complementary approach to resolve some of these difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euromicro Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euromicro Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.1997.617234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euromicro Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.1997.617234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assumptions and difficulties of software quality movement
The context of software quality movement determines the boundaries of "change" for software development organizations. In this paper, we analyze the context of software quality movement in terms of its assumptions and difficulties. In the light of research in software quality movement and analogous research in the business management field, we outline a complementary approach to resolve some of these difficulties.