加强底特律社区影响卫生公平政策变化的能力

Chris M. Coombe, Angela G. Reyes, Sonya Grant, A. Schulz, B. Israel, Jaye Clement, R. Lichtenstein, Sherita Smith
{"title":"加强底特律社区影响卫生公平政策变化的能力","authors":"Chris M. Coombe, Angela G. Reyes, Sonya Grant, A. Schulz, B. Israel, Jaye Clement, R. Lichtenstein, Sherita Smith","doi":"10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy and systems change is essential to attaining public health equity, and involving communities disproportionately experiencing health inequities is critical. Successful policy mobilization requires specific community capacities, many of which exist in marginalized communities but can be strengthened and amplified. Yet attention to strengthening capacity of communities historically excluded from the policy process has been limited. This study applies a community capacity framework to analyze Neighborhoods Working in Partnership (NWP), a multiyear, community-based participatory initiative to strengthen skills and capacity of Detroit residents to equitably engage with diverse partners in all aspects of the policy process. Findings indicate NWP strengthened key dimensions of policy capacity, including skills, participation, leadership, and community power. We discuss strengths and limitations of NWP, and implications for strengthening capacity of disenfranchised communities to engage in local policy action toward the long-term goal of community well-being and equity. \"The most important thing about the training is knowing that I have power that will positively impact my neighborhood and that now I know how to use it.\" (Workshop participant) Background There is considerable evidence that stressors in the social and physical environment and lack of access to resources contribute to poorer health and widening racial/ethnic and economic inequities (Braveman, Cubbin, Egerter, Williams, & Pamuk, 2010; Israel et al., 2010; Link & Phelan, 1995; Schulz, Williams, Israel, & Lempert, 2002). Low-income urban communities and communities of color are disproportionately affected, for example, through exposure to deteriorated housing and neighborhood conditions such as blight and crime, and limited access to jobs and quality services and amenities that can help to protect health (Schulz & Northridge, 2004; Williams & Collins, 2001). These structural conditions are influenced by state and national as well as local and organizational policies, and so policy change is an important strategy to have a more sustained impact on community well-being (Phelan, Link, & Tehranifar, 2010; Williams & Jackson, 2005). Thus, addressing the underlying social determinants of health equity requires the capacity to work effectively with policy and decision makers to address factors such as housing, neighborhood conditions, education, and employment opportunities foundational to the attainment of public health. A successful policy advocacy campaign requires an essential set of skills or capacities (Freudenberg, Rogers, Ritas, & Nerney, 2005; Minkler, Vasquez, Tajik, & Petersen, 2008; Ritas, 2003). Successful models for influencing policy emphasize the need to engage communities that have historically been marginalized or excluded from this process (e.g., low-income communities, communities of color) in policy campaigns (Freudenberg & Tsui, 2014; Themba-Nixon, Minkler, & Freudenberg, 2008). Engagement of community members in policy change efforts can lead to increases in power through translation of concerns into concrete action and identification of policy solutions to issues inadequately addressed by current policy (Cheezum et al., 2013; Ritas, 2003; Roe, Minkler, & Saunders, 1995; Themba-Nixon et al., 2008; Themba, 1999). Many communities regularly engage in policy advocacy efforts, often with a great deal of skill and success. However, relatively few examples exist of initiatives designed to both build on and strengthen dimensions of community capacity, with particular attention to policy advocacy to address determinants of public health and equity (for exceptions, see Minkler, Vasquez, Chang, & Miller, 2009; Sharpe et al., 2015). The recognition that many of these capacities already exist within marginalized communities, and that they can be strengthened and amplified, is central to community-based participatory approaches to research and action, and underlies the efforts described here. …","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"49 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening Community Capacity in Detroit to Influence Policy Change for Health Equity\",\"authors\":\"Chris M. Coombe, Angela G. Reyes, Sonya Grant, A. Schulz, B. Israel, Jaye Clement, R. Lichtenstein, Sherita Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy and systems change is essential to attaining public health equity, and involving communities disproportionately experiencing health inequities is critical. Successful policy mobilization requires specific community capacities, many of which exist in marginalized communities but can be strengthened and amplified. Yet attention to strengthening capacity of communities historically excluded from the policy process has been limited. This study applies a community capacity framework to analyze Neighborhoods Working in Partnership (NWP), a multiyear, community-based participatory initiative to strengthen skills and capacity of Detroit residents to equitably engage with diverse partners in all aspects of the policy process. Findings indicate NWP strengthened key dimensions of policy capacity, including skills, participation, leadership, and community power. We discuss strengths and limitations of NWP, and implications for strengthening capacity of disenfranchised communities to engage in local policy action toward the long-term goal of community well-being and equity. \\\"The most important thing about the training is knowing that I have power that will positively impact my neighborhood and that now I know how to use it.\\\" (Workshop participant) Background There is considerable evidence that stressors in the social and physical environment and lack of access to resources contribute to poorer health and widening racial/ethnic and economic inequities (Braveman, Cubbin, Egerter, Williams, & Pamuk, 2010; Israel et al., 2010; Link & Phelan, 1995; Schulz, Williams, Israel, & Lempert, 2002). Low-income urban communities and communities of color are disproportionately affected, for example, through exposure to deteriorated housing and neighborhood conditions such as blight and crime, and limited access to jobs and quality services and amenities that can help to protect health (Schulz & Northridge, 2004; Williams & Collins, 2001). These structural conditions are influenced by state and national as well as local and organizational policies, and so policy change is an important strategy to have a more sustained impact on community well-being (Phelan, Link, & Tehranifar, 2010; Williams & Jackson, 2005). Thus, addressing the underlying social determinants of health equity requires the capacity to work effectively with policy and decision makers to address factors such as housing, neighborhood conditions, education, and employment opportunities foundational to the attainment of public health. A successful policy advocacy campaign requires an essential set of skills or capacities (Freudenberg, Rogers, Ritas, & Nerney, 2005; Minkler, Vasquez, Tajik, & Petersen, 2008; Ritas, 2003). Successful models for influencing policy emphasize the need to engage communities that have historically been marginalized or excluded from this process (e.g., low-income communities, communities of color) in policy campaigns (Freudenberg & Tsui, 2014; Themba-Nixon, Minkler, & Freudenberg, 2008). Engagement of community members in policy change efforts can lead to increases in power through translation of concerns into concrete action and identification of policy solutions to issues inadequately addressed by current policy (Cheezum et al., 2013; Ritas, 2003; Roe, Minkler, & Saunders, 1995; Themba-Nixon et al., 2008; Themba, 1999). Many communities regularly engage in policy advocacy efforts, often with a great deal of skill and success. However, relatively few examples exist of initiatives designed to both build on and strengthen dimensions of community capacity, with particular attention to policy advocacy to address determinants of public health and equity (for exceptions, see Minkler, Vasquez, Chang, & Miller, 2009; Sharpe et al., 2015). The recognition that many of these capacities already exist within marginalized communities, and that they can be strengthened and amplified, is central to community-based participatory approaches to research and action, and underlies the efforts described here. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":93128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan journal of community service learning\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan journal of community service learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

政策和制度变革对于实现公共卫生公平至关重要,让卫生不公平现象严重的社区参与进来至关重要。成功的政策动员需要特定的社区能力,其中许多能力存在于边缘化社区,但可以得到加强和扩大。然而,对加强历来被排除在政策进程之外的社区的能力的关注一直有限。本研究采用社区能力框架来分析社区合作模式(NWP),这是一项多年期、以社区为基础的参与性倡议,旨在加强底特律居民的技能和能力,以便在政策过程的各个方面公平地与不同的合作伙伴互动。研究结果表明,NWP加强了政策能力的关键维度,包括技能、参与、领导和社区权力。我们讨论了NWP的优势和局限性,以及加强被剥夺公民权的社区参与地方政策行动的能力,以实现社区福祉和公平的长期目标的影响。“这次培训最重要的一点是,我知道我有能力对我的社区产生积极影响,现在我知道如何使用它。”有相当多的证据表明,社会和自然环境中的压力源以及缺乏获得资源的途径会导致健康状况较差,并加剧种族/民族和经济不平等(Braveman, Cubbin, Egerter, Williams, & Pamuk, 2010;Israel et al., 2010;Link & Phelan, 1995;Schulz, Williams, Israel, & Lempert, 2002)。低收入城市社区和有色人种社区受到不成比例的影响,例如,由于暴露于恶化的住房和社区条件,如枯萎病和犯罪,以及获得有助于保护健康的工作和优质服务和便利设施的机会有限(Schulz & Northridge, 2004;Williams & Collins, 2001)。这些结构性条件受到州和国家以及地方和组织政策的影响,因此政策变化是对社区福祉产生更持久影响的重要策略(Phelan, Link, & Tehranifar, 2010;Williams & Jackson, 2005)。因此,要解决卫生公平的基本社会决定因素,就需要有能力与政策和决策者有效合作,解决住房、社区条件、教育和就业机会等实现公共卫生的基础因素。一场成功的政策倡导运动需要一套基本的技能或能力(Freudenberg, Rogers, Ritas, & Nerney, 2005;明克勒,瓦斯奎兹,塔吉克和彼得森,2008;丽塔,2003)。影响政策的成功模式强调,需要让历史上被边缘化或被排除在这一过程之外的社区(例如,低收入社区、有色人种社区)参与政策运动(Freudenberg & Tsui, 2014;Themba-Nixon, Minkler, & Freudenberg, 2008)。社区成员参与政策变革的努力可以通过将关注转化为具体行动,并确定当前政策未充分解决的问题的政策解决方案,从而增加权力(Cheezum等人,2013;丽塔,2003;Roe, Minkler, & Saunders, 1995;Themba-Nixon等人,2008;Themba, 1999)。许多社区经常参与政策宣传工作,往往具有很大的技巧和成功。然而,旨在建立和加强社区能力维度的举措的例子相对较少,特别关注政策宣传,以解决公共卫生和公平的决定因素(关于例外情况,见Minkler, Vasquez, Chang, & Miller, 2009;Sharpe et al., 2015)。认识到许多这样的能力已经存在于边缘化社区中,并且它们可以得到加强和扩大,这是基于社区的参与性研究和行动方法的核心,也是本文所述努力的基础。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening Community Capacity in Detroit to Influence Policy Change for Health Equity
Policy and systems change is essential to attaining public health equity, and involving communities disproportionately experiencing health inequities is critical. Successful policy mobilization requires specific community capacities, many of which exist in marginalized communities but can be strengthened and amplified. Yet attention to strengthening capacity of communities historically excluded from the policy process has been limited. This study applies a community capacity framework to analyze Neighborhoods Working in Partnership (NWP), a multiyear, community-based participatory initiative to strengthen skills and capacity of Detroit residents to equitably engage with diverse partners in all aspects of the policy process. Findings indicate NWP strengthened key dimensions of policy capacity, including skills, participation, leadership, and community power. We discuss strengths and limitations of NWP, and implications for strengthening capacity of disenfranchised communities to engage in local policy action toward the long-term goal of community well-being and equity. "The most important thing about the training is knowing that I have power that will positively impact my neighborhood and that now I know how to use it." (Workshop participant) Background There is considerable evidence that stressors in the social and physical environment and lack of access to resources contribute to poorer health and widening racial/ethnic and economic inequities (Braveman, Cubbin, Egerter, Williams, & Pamuk, 2010; Israel et al., 2010; Link & Phelan, 1995; Schulz, Williams, Israel, & Lempert, 2002). Low-income urban communities and communities of color are disproportionately affected, for example, through exposure to deteriorated housing and neighborhood conditions such as blight and crime, and limited access to jobs and quality services and amenities that can help to protect health (Schulz & Northridge, 2004; Williams & Collins, 2001). These structural conditions are influenced by state and national as well as local and organizational policies, and so policy change is an important strategy to have a more sustained impact on community well-being (Phelan, Link, & Tehranifar, 2010; Williams & Jackson, 2005). Thus, addressing the underlying social determinants of health equity requires the capacity to work effectively with policy and decision makers to address factors such as housing, neighborhood conditions, education, and employment opportunities foundational to the attainment of public health. A successful policy advocacy campaign requires an essential set of skills or capacities (Freudenberg, Rogers, Ritas, & Nerney, 2005; Minkler, Vasquez, Tajik, & Petersen, 2008; Ritas, 2003). Successful models for influencing policy emphasize the need to engage communities that have historically been marginalized or excluded from this process (e.g., low-income communities, communities of color) in policy campaigns (Freudenberg & Tsui, 2014; Themba-Nixon, Minkler, & Freudenberg, 2008). Engagement of community members in policy change efforts can lead to increases in power through translation of concerns into concrete action and identification of policy solutions to issues inadequately addressed by current policy (Cheezum et al., 2013; Ritas, 2003; Roe, Minkler, & Saunders, 1995; Themba-Nixon et al., 2008; Themba, 1999). Many communities regularly engage in policy advocacy efforts, often with a great deal of skill and success. However, relatively few examples exist of initiatives designed to both build on and strengthen dimensions of community capacity, with particular attention to policy advocacy to address determinants of public health and equity (for exceptions, see Minkler, Vasquez, Chang, & Miller, 2009; Sharpe et al., 2015). The recognition that many of these capacities already exist within marginalized communities, and that they can be strengthened and amplified, is central to community-based participatory approaches to research and action, and underlies the efforts described here. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1