能源项目启动阶段模型敏感性的系统缓解

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Advances in Production Engineering & Management Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.14743/apem2020.2.360
M. Daković, B. Lalic, M. Delić, N. Tasić, D. Ciric
{"title":"能源项目启动阶段模型敏感性的系统缓解","authors":"M. Daković, B. Lalic, M. Delić, N. Tasić, D. Ciric","doi":"10.14743/apem2020.2.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early project risk identification and assessment is a complex issue based on decision-making methods that are methodically suitable for successful project delivery. Nevertheless, although there are several risk management assessment tools, in practice, this issue is still not taken seriously enough in the project initiation phase. Literature research reveals a need for an applicable systematic risk model approach, systematic sensitivity of mitigation action plans, considering the need for early systematic project risk awareness. This paper not only explains the evidence that a risk systematic model tool is essential in the project initiation phase but also narrows the gaps through the systematic sensitivity approach with the accent on the integrated risk systematic model. The sensitivity approach is taken in the project early preparation phase, where evaluation, the establishment of limits to which risks are controllable, is based on the stage-gate model. The stage-gate model evaluates which risks are specific to a certain analysis in the early project definition phase, leads to the conclusion that excluding any mitigation elements or probability of risk occurrence reflects on the outcomes, and presents an unrealistic picture of the given project targets. This research represents a reliable risk tool with improvements in resolving systematic risk system faults, 'stakeholders' subjective decision gaps, constricting project contingency, and shortening project schedule deviation. The research is based on two complex industry (case studies) projects within the energy industry. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":48763,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","volume":"70 1","pages":"217-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic mitigation of model sensitivity in the initiation phase of energy projects\",\"authors\":\"M. Daković, B. Lalic, M. Delić, N. Tasić, D. Ciric\",\"doi\":\"10.14743/apem2020.2.360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early project risk identification and assessment is a complex issue based on decision-making methods that are methodically suitable for successful project delivery. Nevertheless, although there are several risk management assessment tools, in practice, this issue is still not taken seriously enough in the project initiation phase. Literature research reveals a need for an applicable systematic risk model approach, systematic sensitivity of mitigation action plans, considering the need for early systematic project risk awareness. This paper not only explains the evidence that a risk systematic model tool is essential in the project initiation phase but also narrows the gaps through the systematic sensitivity approach with the accent on the integrated risk systematic model. The sensitivity approach is taken in the project early preparation phase, where evaluation, the establishment of limits to which risks are controllable, is based on the stage-gate model. The stage-gate model evaluates which risks are specific to a certain analysis in the early project definition phase, leads to the conclusion that excluding any mitigation elements or probability of risk occurrence reflects on the outcomes, and presents an unrealistic picture of the given project targets. This research represents a reliable risk tool with improvements in resolving systematic risk system faults, 'stakeholders' subjective decision gaps, constricting project contingency, and shortening project schedule deviation. The research is based on two complex industry (case studies) projects within the energy industry. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Production Engineering & Management\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"217-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Production Engineering & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.2.360\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.2.360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期的项目风险识别和评估是一个复杂的问题,它基于系统地适合于成功项目交付的决策方法。然而,尽管有几种风险管理评估工具,但在实践中,这个问题在项目启动阶段仍然没有得到足够的重视。文献研究表明,需要一种适用的系统风险模型方法,缓解行动计划的系统敏感性,考虑到需要早期的系统项目风险意识。本文不仅解释了风险系统模型工具在项目启动阶段必不可少的证据,而且通过系统敏感性方法缩小了差距,重点介绍了综合风险系统模型。在项目前期准备阶段采用敏感性方法,基于阶段-门模型进行评估,确定风险可控范围。阶段-门模型在项目早期定义阶段评估哪些风险是特定于某个分析的,得出的结论是,排除任何缓解因素或风险发生的可能性会影响结果,并对给定的项目目标提出不切实际的看法。本研究是一种可靠的风险工具,在解决系统风险、系统故障、利益相关者主观决策差距、约束项目偶然性和缩短项目进度偏差等方面具有改进作用。该研究基于能源行业内的两个复杂的行业(案例研究)项目。©2020 CPE,马里博尔大学。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic mitigation of model sensitivity in the initiation phase of energy projects
Early project risk identification and assessment is a complex issue based on decision-making methods that are methodically suitable for successful project delivery. Nevertheless, although there are several risk management assessment tools, in practice, this issue is still not taken seriously enough in the project initiation phase. Literature research reveals a need for an applicable systematic risk model approach, systematic sensitivity of mitigation action plans, considering the need for early systematic project risk awareness. This paper not only explains the evidence that a risk systematic model tool is essential in the project initiation phase but also narrows the gaps through the systematic sensitivity approach with the accent on the integrated risk systematic model. The sensitivity approach is taken in the project early preparation phase, where evaluation, the establishment of limits to which risks are controllable, is based on the stage-gate model. The stage-gate model evaluates which risks are specific to a certain analysis in the early project definition phase, leads to the conclusion that excluding any mitigation elements or probability of risk occurrence reflects on the outcomes, and presents an unrealistic picture of the given project targets. This research represents a reliable risk tool with improvements in resolving systematic risk system faults, 'stakeholders' subjective decision gaps, constricting project contingency, and shortening project schedule deviation. The research is based on two complex industry (case studies) projects within the energy industry. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Production Engineering & Management
Advances in Production Engineering & Management ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURINGMATERIALS SCIENC-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
22.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Advances in Production Engineering & Management (APEM journal) is an interdisciplinary international academic journal published quarterly. The main goal of the APEM journal is to present original, high quality, theoretical and application-oriented research developments in all areas of production engineering and production management to a broad audience of academics and practitioners. In order to bridge the gap between theory and practice, applications based on advanced theory and case studies are particularly welcome. For theoretical papers, their originality and research contributions are the main factors in the evaluation process. General approaches, formalisms, algorithms or techniques should be illustrated with significant applications that demonstrate their applicability to real-world problems. Please note the APEM journal is not intended especially for studying problems in the finance, economics, business, and bank sectors even though the methodology in the paper is quality/project management oriented. Therefore, the papers should include a substantial level of engineering issues in the field of manufacturing engineering.
期刊最新文献
Optimal path planning of a disinfection mobile robot against COVID-19 in a ROS-based research platform A comparative study of different pull control strategies in multi-product manufacturing systems using discrete event simulation The impact of the collaborative workplace on the production system capacity: Simulation modelling vs. real-world application approach Molecular-dynamics study of multi-pulsed ultrafast laser interaction with copper A deep learning-based worker assistance system for error prevention: Case study in a real-world manual assembly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1