艾玛·沃特森在接受英国时尚杂志《vogue》采访时藐视格言

Q1 Arts and Humanities JALT CALL Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.15575/call.v4i2.16998
Y. Rahayu, Dewi Kustanti, Erfan Muhamad Fauzi
{"title":"艾玛·沃特森在接受英国时尚杂志《vogue》采访时藐视格言","authors":"Y. Rahayu, Dewi Kustanti, Erfan Muhamad Fauzi","doi":"10.15575/call.v4i2.16998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was done to find out more about how a person talks. Conversations between two or more people are usually inseparable from mistakes, uncooperative actions and often exceed expectations. Therefore, an observation in an interview between Paris Lee and Emma Watson is intended to examine the flouting maxim in the speeches made. This research uses qualitative methods with Grice’s supporting theories cooperative principle and flouting maxim. Several data are included in the flouting maxim, namely four data flouting maxim of quantity, three data flouting maxim of quality, four data flouting maxim of manner, and two data flouting maxim relation. From the data analysis, it can be known that the flouting maxim arises when one of the participants, Watson and Paris, insert implied meaning into their speech until they were not cooperative during the interview. Keywords: flouting maxim, cooperative principle, utterance, conversation, interview","PeriodicalId":37946,"journal":{"name":"JALT CALL Journal","volume":"49 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FLOUTING MAXIM IN EMMA WATSON’S “BEING 30 AND HAPPILY SINGLE” BRITISH VOGUE INTERVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Y. Rahayu, Dewi Kustanti, Erfan Muhamad Fauzi\",\"doi\":\"10.15575/call.v4i2.16998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was done to find out more about how a person talks. Conversations between two or more people are usually inseparable from mistakes, uncooperative actions and often exceed expectations. Therefore, an observation in an interview between Paris Lee and Emma Watson is intended to examine the flouting maxim in the speeches made. This research uses qualitative methods with Grice’s supporting theories cooperative principle and flouting maxim. Several data are included in the flouting maxim, namely four data flouting maxim of quantity, three data flouting maxim of quality, four data flouting maxim of manner, and two data flouting maxim relation. From the data analysis, it can be known that the flouting maxim arises when one of the participants, Watson and Paris, insert implied meaning into their speech until they were not cooperative during the interview. Keywords: flouting maxim, cooperative principle, utterance, conversation, interview\",\"PeriodicalId\":37946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JALT CALL Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JALT CALL Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v4i2.16998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JALT CALL Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v4i2.16998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是为了更多地了解一个人是如何说话的。两个或更多人之间的对话通常离不开错误、不合作的行为,而且经常超出预期。因此,通过对帕丽斯·李和艾玛·沃特森的采访,我们可以观察到她们在演讲中所表达的蔑视格言。本研究采用定性方法,并以格赖斯的合作原则和藐视准则为理论支撑。藐视准则包含了几个数据,即数量藐视四项数据准则、质量藐视三项数据准则、方式藐视四项数据准则和关系藐视两项数据准则。从数据分析中可以知道,当参与者之一Watson和Paris在他们的讲话中插入隐含的含义,直到他们在采访中不合作时,就会出现藐视准则。关键词:藐视准则,合作原则,话语,对话,访谈
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FLOUTING MAXIM IN EMMA WATSON’S “BEING 30 AND HAPPILY SINGLE” BRITISH VOGUE INTERVIEW
This study was done to find out more about how a person talks. Conversations between two or more people are usually inseparable from mistakes, uncooperative actions and often exceed expectations. Therefore, an observation in an interview between Paris Lee and Emma Watson is intended to examine the flouting maxim in the speeches made. This research uses qualitative methods with Grice’s supporting theories cooperative principle and flouting maxim. Several data are included in the flouting maxim, namely four data flouting maxim of quantity, three data flouting maxim of quality, four data flouting maxim of manner, and two data flouting maxim relation. From the data analysis, it can be known that the flouting maxim arises when one of the participants, Watson and Paris, insert implied meaning into their speech until they were not cooperative during the interview. Keywords: flouting maxim, cooperative principle, utterance, conversation, interview
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JALT CALL Journal
JALT CALL Journal Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The JALT CALL Journal is an international refereed journal committed to excellence in research in all areas within the field of Computer Assisted Language Learning.
期刊最新文献
Corpus Linguistics in EFL Language Teaching: Insights From Research and Practice A Change for the Times: Rethinking Book Review Writing Word Parts and Language Learning A Contextualized Meaning-Recall Vocabulary Testing Platform Relationship Between L2 Proficiency and Psychological Traits With Self-Assessment Bias Among L2 Speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1