Song-Tao Han, Y. Fei, Jin-You Huang, Mei Xu, Li-Chan Chen, D. Liao, Yujie Tan
{"title":"细菌β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)扩谱基因快速检测方法的建立","authors":"Song-Tao Han, Y. Fei, Jin-You Huang, Mei Xu, Li-Chan Chen, D. Liao, Yujie Tan","doi":"10.7171/JBT.16-2704-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes that render bacteria resistant to antibiotics are commonly detected using phenotype testing, which is time consuming and not sufficiently accurate. To establish a better method, we used phenotype testing to identify ESBL-positive bacterial strains and conducted PCR to screen for TEM (named after the patient Temoneira who provided the first sample), sulfhydryl reagent variable (SHV), cefotaxime (CTX)-M-1, and CTX-M-9, the 4 most common ESBL types and subtypes. We then performed multiplex PCR with 1 primer containing a biotin and hybridized the PCR products with gene-specific probes that were coupled with microbeads and coated with a specific fluorescence. The hybrids were linked to streptavidin-R-phycoerythrins (SA-PEs) and run through a flow cytometer, which sorted the fluorescently dyed microbeads and quantified the PEs. The results from single PCR, multiplex PCR, and cytometry were consistent with each other. We used this method to test 169 clinical specimens that had been determined for phenotypes and found 154 positive for genotypes, including 30 of the 45 samples that were negative for phenotypes. The CTX-M genotype tests alone, counting both positive and negative cases, showed 99.41% (168/169) consistency with the ESBL phenotype test. Thus, we have established a multiplex-PCR system as a simple and quick method that is high throughput and accurate for detecting 4 common ESBL types and subtypes.","PeriodicalId":94326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","volume":"1 1","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of a Simple and Quick Method for Detecting Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Genes in Bacteria.\",\"authors\":\"Song-Tao Han, Y. Fei, Jin-You Huang, Mei Xu, Li-Chan Chen, D. Liao, Yujie Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.7171/JBT.16-2704-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes that render bacteria resistant to antibiotics are commonly detected using phenotype testing, which is time consuming and not sufficiently accurate. To establish a better method, we used phenotype testing to identify ESBL-positive bacterial strains and conducted PCR to screen for TEM (named after the patient Temoneira who provided the first sample), sulfhydryl reagent variable (SHV), cefotaxime (CTX)-M-1, and CTX-M-9, the 4 most common ESBL types and subtypes. We then performed multiplex PCR with 1 primer containing a biotin and hybridized the PCR products with gene-specific probes that were coupled with microbeads and coated with a specific fluorescence. The hybrids were linked to streptavidin-R-phycoerythrins (SA-PEs) and run through a flow cytometer, which sorted the fluorescently dyed microbeads and quantified the PEs. The results from single PCR, multiplex PCR, and cytometry were consistent with each other. We used this method to test 169 clinical specimens that had been determined for phenotypes and found 154 positive for genotypes, including 30 of the 45 samples that were negative for phenotypes. The CTX-M genotype tests alone, counting both positive and negative cases, showed 99.41% (168/169) consistency with the ESBL phenotype test. Thus, we have established a multiplex-PCR system as a simple and quick method that is high throughput and accurate for detecting 4 common ESBL types and subtypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"132-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7171/JBT.16-2704-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7171/JBT.16-2704-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
使细菌对抗生素产生耐药性的广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)基因通常使用表型检测来检测,这种检测既耗时又不够准确。为了建立更好的方法,我们采用表型检测方法鉴定ESBL阳性菌株,并采用PCR方法筛选TEM(以提供第一份样品的患者Temoneira命名)、巯基试剂变量(SHV)、头孢噻肟(CTX)-M-1和CTX- m -9这4种最常见的ESBL型和亚型。然后,我们用1个含有生物素的引物进行多重PCR,并将PCR产物与基因特异性探针杂交,该探针与微珠偶联并涂有特异性荧光。这些杂交体与链亲和素- r -植红蛋白(SA-PEs)相连,并通过流式细胞仪对荧光染色的微珠进行分类并定量PEs。单次PCR、多重PCR及细胞术检测结果一致。我们使用这种方法对169个临床标本进行了表型检测,发现154个基因型阳性,包括45个表型阴性样本中的30个。CTX-M基因型检测与ESBL表型检测的一致性为99.41%(168/169)。因此,我们建立了一种简便、快速、高通量、准确检测4种常见ESBL型和亚型的多重pcr系统。
Establishment of a Simple and Quick Method for Detecting Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Genes in Bacteria.
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes that render bacteria resistant to antibiotics are commonly detected using phenotype testing, which is time consuming and not sufficiently accurate. To establish a better method, we used phenotype testing to identify ESBL-positive bacterial strains and conducted PCR to screen for TEM (named after the patient Temoneira who provided the first sample), sulfhydryl reagent variable (SHV), cefotaxime (CTX)-M-1, and CTX-M-9, the 4 most common ESBL types and subtypes. We then performed multiplex PCR with 1 primer containing a biotin and hybridized the PCR products with gene-specific probes that were coupled with microbeads and coated with a specific fluorescence. The hybrids were linked to streptavidin-R-phycoerythrins (SA-PEs) and run through a flow cytometer, which sorted the fluorescently dyed microbeads and quantified the PEs. The results from single PCR, multiplex PCR, and cytometry were consistent with each other. We used this method to test 169 clinical specimens that had been determined for phenotypes and found 154 positive for genotypes, including 30 of the 45 samples that were negative for phenotypes. The CTX-M genotype tests alone, counting both positive and negative cases, showed 99.41% (168/169) consistency with the ESBL phenotype test. Thus, we have established a multiplex-PCR system as a simple and quick method that is high throughput and accurate for detecting 4 common ESBL types and subtypes.