争夺“原住民”的位置:马来西亚半岛的分层历史和定位

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia Pub Date : 2022-04-16 DOI:10.1355/sj37-1c
Rusaslina Idrus
{"title":"争夺“原住民”的位置:马来西亚半岛的分层历史和定位","authors":"Rusaslina Idrus","doi":"10.1355/sj37-1c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Malaysia, multiple discourses of Indigenous rights have long existed in different forms: Malay, Orang Asli, bumiputera, natives, pribumi, Orang Asal, aboriginal—these are all terms that can be translated as 'Indigenous'. New international Indigenous rights discourses are layered upon these existing discourses and become reworked, as do local forms of Indigenous identity claims. In this paper, I examine and explore the potential and limits of the claims to indigeneity in peninsular Malaysia as different groups at times align and clash in their claims for the Indigenous slot.","PeriodicalId":43547,"journal":{"name":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing for the 'Indigenous' Slot: Layered Histories and Positionings in Peninsular Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Rusaslina Idrus\",\"doi\":\"10.1355/sj37-1c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In Malaysia, multiple discourses of Indigenous rights have long existed in different forms: Malay, Orang Asli, bumiputera, natives, pribumi, Orang Asal, aboriginal—these are all terms that can be translated as 'Indigenous'. New international Indigenous rights discourses are layered upon these existing discourses and become reworked, as do local forms of Indigenous identity claims. In this paper, I examine and explore the potential and limits of the claims to indigeneity in peninsular Malaysia as different groups at times align and clash in their claims for the Indigenous slot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1355/sj37-1c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/sj37-1c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在马来西亚,土著权利的多重话语长期以不同的形式存在:马来语(Malay)、土著语(Orang Asli)、土著语(bumiputera)、土著语(pribumi)、土著语(Orang Asal)、土著语(aboriginal)——这些都可以翻译为“土著”。新的国际土著权利话语在这些现有话语的基础上分层,并被重新设计,土著身份主张的地方形式也是如此。在本文中,我研究和探索了马来西亚半岛土著权利主张的潜力和局限性,因为不同的群体有时会在他们对土著地位的主张中结盟和冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competing for the 'Indigenous' Slot: Layered Histories and Positionings in Peninsular Malaysia
Abstract:In Malaysia, multiple discourses of Indigenous rights have long existed in different forms: Malay, Orang Asli, bumiputera, natives, pribumi, Orang Asal, aboriginal—these are all terms that can be translated as 'Indigenous'. New international Indigenous rights discourses are layered upon these existing discourses and become reworked, as do local forms of Indigenous identity claims. In this paper, I examine and explore the potential and limits of the claims to indigeneity in peninsular Malaysia as different groups at times align and clash in their claims for the Indigenous slot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Application of Guangdong Chaoyang Paper Cutting Elements in Cheongsam Design Extension Model of Administration and Management for Business of Community Enterprise The Application of Place-Based Education in Social Studies of Grade 5 Bhutanese Students The Correlation between Hostel Brand Equity Dimensions in Thailand Evaluating English Proficiency Requirement for logistics core competency: CEFR framework for entry-level logisticians in Thailand’s EEC context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1