重新审视词汇衔接。语料库与系统功能分析相结合

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics Pub Date : 2018-12-24 DOI:10.7203/qf.23.13523
María de los Ángeles Gómez González
{"title":"重新审视词汇衔接。语料库与系统功能分析相结合","authors":"María de los Ángeles Gómez González","doi":"10.7203/qf.23.13523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I argue for a refinement of the classic SFL approach to lexical cohesion. First, a literature overview is provided in which key principles and related categories are examined. In addition, the connection of cohesion and discourse coherence is addressed and an overview is provided of the wide range of applications that the former has in such fields as genre studies, language teaching and learning, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics, among others. The core SFL models of cohesion are then revisited in order to propose a modified taxonomy of lexical cohesion, involving five distinct types (repetition, synonymy, opposition, inclusion and association) that are cross-classified by four kinds of distance-based ties (immediate, immediate-mediated, remote and remote-mediated). After this, the model is attested in the telephone conversation and broadcast discussion components of the International Corpus of English-Great Britain. The analysis of 10,042 cohesive ties reveals that repetition and association are the most frequently used lexical cohesion strategies across the two genres. They are overwhelmingly produced over speakers’ turns and remote-mediated ties. The results further indicate that lexical patterns collaborate in topic management, staging and turn-taking strategies.","PeriodicalId":40958,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical cohesion revisited. A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis\",\"authors\":\"María de los Ángeles Gómez González\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/qf.23.13523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I argue for a refinement of the classic SFL approach to lexical cohesion. First, a literature overview is provided in which key principles and related categories are examined. In addition, the connection of cohesion and discourse coherence is addressed and an overview is provided of the wide range of applications that the former has in such fields as genre studies, language teaching and learning, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics, among others. The core SFL models of cohesion are then revisited in order to propose a modified taxonomy of lexical cohesion, involving five distinct types (repetition, synonymy, opposition, inclusion and association) that are cross-classified by four kinds of distance-based ties (immediate, immediate-mediated, remote and remote-mediated). After this, the model is attested in the telephone conversation and broadcast discussion components of the International Corpus of English-Great Britain. The analysis of 10,042 cohesive ties reveals that repetition and association are the most frequently used lexical cohesion strategies across the two genres. They are overwhelmingly produced over speakers’ turns and remote-mediated ties. The results further indicate that lexical patterns collaborate in topic management, staging and turn-taking strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.23.13523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.23.13523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我主张对经典的外语词汇衔接方法进行改进。首先,提供了文献综述,其中主要原则和相关类别进行了检查。此外,本文还讨论了衔接与语篇连贯的关系,并概述了衔接与语篇连贯在文体研究、语言教学、心理语言学和计算语言学等领域的广泛应用。在此基础上,本文重新审视了核心的外语衔接模型,提出了一种改进的词汇衔接分类法,包括五种不同的类型(重复、同义、对立、包含和联想),并根据四种基于距离的联系(即时、即时介导、远程和远程介导)进行交叉分类。然后,在《国际英语-大不列颠语料库》的电话会话部分和广播讨论部分对该模型进行了验证。对10042条衔接关系的分析表明,重复和联想是两种文体中最常用的词汇衔接策略。它们绝大多数是通过演讲者的轮流和远程中介关系产生的。结果进一步表明,词汇模式在话题管理、阶段和轮换策略中起协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lexical cohesion revisited. A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis
In this article I argue for a refinement of the classic SFL approach to lexical cohesion. First, a literature overview is provided in which key principles and related categories are examined. In addition, the connection of cohesion and discourse coherence is addressed and an overview is provided of the wide range of applications that the former has in such fields as genre studies, language teaching and learning, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics, among others. The core SFL models of cohesion are then revisited in order to propose a modified taxonomy of lexical cohesion, involving five distinct types (repetition, synonymy, opposition, inclusion and association) that are cross-classified by four kinds of distance-based ties (immediate, immediate-mediated, remote and remote-mediated). After this, the model is attested in the telephone conversation and broadcast discussion components of the International Corpus of English-Great Britain. The analysis of 10,042 cohesive ties reveals that repetition and association are the most frequently used lexical cohesion strategies across the two genres. They are overwhelmingly produced over speakers’ turns and remote-mediated ties. The results further indicate that lexical patterns collaborate in topic management, staging and turn-taking strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
¿Es el discurso académico preciso cuando se apoya en la traducción automática? ¿Posedición como propuesta prospectiva? servicios lingüísticos especializados en la formación de traductores La traducción literaria asistida por ordenador aplicada a la novela histórica (alemán-español): entrenamiento y comparación de sistemas de traducción automática “Más bellas y más infieles que nunca”. Usos y percepciones en materia tecnológica entre el profesorado de traducción jurídica de España Perspectivas de la localización de videojuegos: complejidades y problemáticas traductológicas del siglo XXI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1