基于gpr测量资料的滨海断裂带萨尔马段晚第四纪位移(贝加尔湖裂谷)

Pub Date : 2020-09-23 DOI:10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0490
I. Denisenko, O. Lunina
{"title":"基于gpr测量资料的滨海断裂带萨尔马段晚第四纪位移(贝加尔湖裂谷)","authors":"I. Denisenko, O. Lunina","doi":"10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys were performed in the Sarma segment of the Primorsky fault between the settlements of Shida and Kurma. This segment belongs to one of the largest structures of the Baikal rift and was active in Late Quaternary (Early Holocene). The study aimed to reconstruct vertical displacement amplitudes and dip angles of fractures along the fault segment, clarify its kinematic type, and estimate a maximum magnitude of earthquakes that may occur in the study area. The GPR equipment set included an OKO-2 georadar and AB-250M and ABDL-Triton shielded antennas. The GPR surveys were supported by morphostructural and tectonophysical methods. Based on the interpretation of the geophysical survey data and satellite images, faults associated with the Sarma paleoseismic dislocation were mapped. Their total length amounts to 14 km. According to the GPR survey data, one-stage vertical displacements show normal faulting and vary from SW to NE from 4.4 to 7.7 m. Paleo-earthquake magnitudes calculated from the maximum displacement values (Mw=7.2, and Мs=7.4) suggest that potential earthquakes in the Primorsky fault zone may be stronger than previously assumed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Quarternary displacements along the Sarma segment of the Primorsky fault based on gpr survey data (Baikal rift)\",\"authors\":\"I. Denisenko, O. Lunina\",\"doi\":\"10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys were performed in the Sarma segment of the Primorsky fault between the settlements of Shida and Kurma. This segment belongs to one of the largest structures of the Baikal rift and was active in Late Quaternary (Early Holocene). The study aimed to reconstruct vertical displacement amplitudes and dip angles of fractures along the fault segment, clarify its kinematic type, and estimate a maximum magnitude of earthquakes that may occur in the study area. The GPR equipment set included an OKO-2 georadar and AB-250M and ABDL-Triton shielded antennas. The GPR surveys were supported by morphostructural and tectonophysical methods. Based on the interpretation of the geophysical survey data and satellite images, faults associated with the Sarma paleoseismic dislocation were mapped. Their total length amounts to 14 km. According to the GPR survey data, one-stage vertical displacements show normal faulting and vary from SW to NE from 4.4 to 7.7 m. Paleo-earthquake magnitudes calculated from the maximum displacement values (Mw=7.2, and Мs=7.4) suggest that potential earthquakes in the Primorsky fault zone may be stronger than previously assumed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2020-11-3-0490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

. 探地雷达(GPR)测量在什达和库尔马定居点之间的滨海断层萨尔马段进行。该段属于贝加尔湖裂谷最大的构造之一,活动于晚第四纪(早全新世)。研究旨在重建断层段裂缝的垂直位移幅值和倾角,明确其运动学类型,估计研究区可能发生的最大地震震级。GPR设备包括一个OKO-2地质雷达和AB-250M和ABDL-Triton屏蔽天线。地质探地雷达调查得到了形态构造和构造物理方法的支持。根据地球物理调查资料和卫星图像的解释,绘制了与萨尔马古地震位错有关的断层图。它们的总长度达14公里。探地雷达调查资料显示,一期垂向位移为正断层,从西南向东北方向变化,范围为4.4 ~ 7.7 m。根据最大位移值(Mw=7.2, Мs=7.4)计算的古地震震级表明,滨海断裂带的潜在地震可能比先前假设的更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Late Quarternary displacements along the Sarma segment of the Primorsky fault based on gpr survey data (Baikal rift)
. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys were performed in the Sarma segment of the Primorsky fault between the settlements of Shida and Kurma. This segment belongs to one of the largest structures of the Baikal rift and was active in Late Quaternary (Early Holocene). The study aimed to reconstruct vertical displacement amplitudes and dip angles of fractures along the fault segment, clarify its kinematic type, and estimate a maximum magnitude of earthquakes that may occur in the study area. The GPR equipment set included an OKO-2 georadar and AB-250M and ABDL-Triton shielded antennas. The GPR surveys were supported by morphostructural and tectonophysical methods. Based on the interpretation of the geophysical survey data and satellite images, faults associated with the Sarma paleoseismic dislocation were mapped. Their total length amounts to 14 km. According to the GPR survey data, one-stage vertical displacements show normal faulting and vary from SW to NE from 4.4 to 7.7 m. Paleo-earthquake magnitudes calculated from the maximum displacement values (Mw=7.2, and Мs=7.4) suggest that potential earthquakes in the Primorsky fault zone may be stronger than previously assumed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1