利用漏洞分析和秘密识别潜在的安全漏洞

Curtis Busby-Earle, E. Mugisa
{"title":"利用漏洞分析和秘密识别潜在的安全漏洞","authors":"Curtis Busby-Earle, E. Mugisa","doi":"10.5176/2010-2283_1.2.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary software development there are a number of methods that attempt to ensure the security of a system. Many of these methods are however introduced in the latter stages of development or try to address the issues of securing a software system by envisioning possible threats to that system, knowledge that is usually both subjective and esoteric. In this paper we introduce the concept of path fixation and discuss how contradictory paths or loopholes, discovered during requirements engineering and using only a requirements specification document, can lead to potential security flaws in a proposed system. The SECREt is a proof-of-concept prototype tool developed to demonstrate the effectiveness of loophole analysis. We discuss how the tool performs a loophole analysis and present the results of tests conducted on an actual specification document. We conclude that loophole analysis is an effective, objective method for the discovery of potential vulnerabilitites that exist in proposed systems and that the SECREt can be successfully incorporated into the requirements engineering process.","PeriodicalId":91079,"journal":{"name":"GSTF international journal on computing","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Potential Security Flaws using Loophole Analysis and the SECREt\",\"authors\":\"Curtis Busby-Earle, E. Mugisa\",\"doi\":\"10.5176/2010-2283_1.2.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In contemporary software development there are a number of methods that attempt to ensure the security of a system. Many of these methods are however introduced in the latter stages of development or try to address the issues of securing a software system by envisioning possible threats to that system, knowledge that is usually both subjective and esoteric. In this paper we introduce the concept of path fixation and discuss how contradictory paths or loopholes, discovered during requirements engineering and using only a requirements specification document, can lead to potential security flaws in a proposed system. The SECREt is a proof-of-concept prototype tool developed to demonstrate the effectiveness of loophole analysis. We discuss how the tool performs a loophole analysis and present the results of tests conducted on an actual specification document. We conclude that loophole analysis is an effective, objective method for the discovery of potential vulnerabilitites that exist in proposed systems and that the SECREt can be successfully incorporated into the requirements engineering process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GSTF international journal on computing\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GSTF international journal on computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5176/2010-2283_1.2.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF international journal on computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2010-2283_1.2.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当代软件开发中,有许多方法试图确保系统的安全性。然而,这些方法中的许多都是在开发的后期阶段引入的,或者试图通过设想对该系统的可能威胁来解决保护软件系统的问题,这些知识通常是主观的和深奥的。在本文中,我们介绍了路径固定的概念,并讨论了在需求工程期间发现的、仅使用需求规范文档的矛盾路径或漏洞是如何导致拟议系统中潜在的安全缺陷的。SECREt是一个概念验证原型工具,用于演示漏洞分析的有效性。我们将讨论该工具如何执行漏洞分析,并给出在实际规范文档上进行的测试结果。我们得出结论,漏洞分析是一种有效的、客观的方法,用于发现存在于被提议系统中的潜在漏洞,并且SECREt可以成功地合并到需求工程过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Potential Security Flaws using Loophole Analysis and the SECREt
In contemporary software development there are a number of methods that attempt to ensure the security of a system. Many of these methods are however introduced in the latter stages of development or try to address the issues of securing a software system by envisioning possible threats to that system, knowledge that is usually both subjective and esoteric. In this paper we introduce the concept of path fixation and discuss how contradictory paths or loopholes, discovered during requirements engineering and using only a requirements specification document, can lead to potential security flaws in a proposed system. The SECREt is a proof-of-concept prototype tool developed to demonstrate the effectiveness of loophole analysis. We discuss how the tool performs a loophole analysis and present the results of tests conducted on an actual specification document. We conclude that loophole analysis is an effective, objective method for the discovery of potential vulnerabilitites that exist in proposed systems and that the SECREt can be successfully incorporated into the requirements engineering process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Computing supported Medical Decision Support System for Patient’s Driving Assessment Propaganda Barometer : A Supportive Tool to Improve Media Literacy Towards Building a Critically Thinking Society A framework for the adoption of bring your own device (BYOD) in the hospital environment On developing adaptive vocabulary learning game for children with an early language delay Stroke Cognitive Medical Assistant (StrokeCMA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1