私有化:20世纪80年代的新西兰实验:夫妻店如何发展?

Andrew Cardow, W. Wilson
{"title":"私有化:20世纪80年代的新西兰实验:夫妻店如何发展?","authors":"Andrew Cardow, W. Wilson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2178696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many would judge the privatisation program which was a significant feature of the New Zealand Experiment of the 1980’s and 90’s, in which both Labour and National governments adopted extreme right wing policies, a failure. In looking at the privatisation of state assets we find they were, at least from an investors’ perspective reasonably successful. Returns to investors who held a portfolio of privatised assets outperformed the NZ share market as a whole. An investment strategy of buying each privatisation, on the market on day one, would have yielded a return of 12.71%, while a similar investment in the entire NZ market would have returned only 7.01%. Also there can be little doubt; the nine privatisations in this sample have had a considerable impact on the NZ stock market, following the listing of Telecom in 1991 total privatised assets comprising 49% of the NZ total market and for twenty years the capitalisation of the privatisation sample has averaged 37% of the NZ total market. Analysis of government papers of the day reveals the government’s overall objective was increased efficiency, flowing from a fundamental belief that government couldn’t and shouldn’t run commercial businesses. In this they were successful, but at what cost?","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privatisation: The New Zealand Experiment of the 1980’s: How Did Mom and Pop Fare?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Cardow, W. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2178696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many would judge the privatisation program which was a significant feature of the New Zealand Experiment of the 1980’s and 90’s, in which both Labour and National governments adopted extreme right wing policies, a failure. In looking at the privatisation of state assets we find they were, at least from an investors’ perspective reasonably successful. Returns to investors who held a portfolio of privatised assets outperformed the NZ share market as a whole. An investment strategy of buying each privatisation, on the market on day one, would have yielded a return of 12.71%, while a similar investment in the entire NZ market would have returned only 7.01%. Also there can be little doubt; the nine privatisations in this sample have had a considerable impact on the NZ stock market, following the listing of Telecom in 1991 total privatised assets comprising 49% of the NZ total market and for twenty years the capitalisation of the privatisation sample has averaged 37% of the NZ total market. Analysis of government papers of the day reveals the government’s overall objective was increased efficiency, flowing from a fundamental belief that government couldn’t and shouldn’t run commercial businesses. In this they were successful, but at what cost?\",\"PeriodicalId\":70912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"政治经济学季刊\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"政治经济学季刊\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2178696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"政治经济学季刊","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2178696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多人会认为私有化计划是失败的。私有化计划是20世纪80年代和90年代新西兰实验的一个重要特征,工党和国家党政府都采取了极右翼政策。在审视国有资产私有化的过程中,我们发现,至少从投资者的角度来看,它们相当成功。持有私有化资产组合的投资者的回报优于新西兰股市整体表现。在第一天就在市场上购买每个私有化的投资策略将产生12.71%的回报,而在整个新西兰市场进行类似的投资将只会产生7.01%的回报。而且,毫无疑问;该样本中的九次私有化对新西兰股票市场产生了相当大的影响,1991年电信上市后,私有化总资产占新西兰总市场的49%,20年来私有化样本的资本化平均占新西兰总市场的37%。对当日政府文件的分析显示,政府的总体目标是提高效率,这源于一个基本信念,即政府不能也不应该经营商业企业。在这方面,他们是成功的,但代价是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privatisation: The New Zealand Experiment of the 1980’s: How Did Mom and Pop Fare?
Many would judge the privatisation program which was a significant feature of the New Zealand Experiment of the 1980’s and 90’s, in which both Labour and National governments adopted extreme right wing policies, a failure. In looking at the privatisation of state assets we find they were, at least from an investors’ perspective reasonably successful. Returns to investors who held a portfolio of privatised assets outperformed the NZ share market as a whole. An investment strategy of buying each privatisation, on the market on day one, would have yielded a return of 12.71%, while a similar investment in the entire NZ market would have returned only 7.01%. Also there can be little doubt; the nine privatisations in this sample have had a considerable impact on the NZ stock market, following the listing of Telecom in 1991 total privatised assets comprising 49% of the NZ total market and for twenty years the capitalisation of the privatisation sample has averaged 37% of the NZ total market. Analysis of government papers of the day reveals the government’s overall objective was increased efficiency, flowing from a fundamental belief that government couldn’t and shouldn’t run commercial businesses. In this they were successful, but at what cost?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
The Development of the Discipline of the History of Foreign Economic Thought in China: Based on the Investigation of the Chinese Society for the Foreign Economic Theories Building World-Class State-owned Enterprises —Connotation, Characteristics, Measurement, and Development Direction The Development Logic of Unbalanced Duality of Digital-Economy Globalization The Transformational Development of Socialist Foreign Trade with Chinese Characteristics and its Strategic Significance: A Review of Professor Shuli Song's “The Transformational Development of Socialist Foreign Trade with Chinese Characteristics: Based on the Empirical Study of Zhejiang's Private Ec Surprises in Life and a Retrospect of the Career in Economics: An Interview with Renowned American Economist Samuel Bowles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1