GDM:糖尿病越多,好还是坏?

R. Silver
{"title":"GDM:糖尿病越多,好还是坏?","authors":"R. Silver","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.15998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not \"2-step\" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GDM: more diabetes, more good or more harm?\",\"authors\":\"R. Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.15998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not \\\"2-step\\\" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本期《BJOG》中,Shah和Sharif报道了符合IADPSG标准的妇女出现不良围产期结局的风险增加,但没有报道GDM的“两步”标准(Shah B等)。问卷2019)。这些妇女没有被认为患有GDM,也没有接受治疗。作者采用了一种巧妙的研究设计,利用了基于人群的数据,他们的发现与其他研究一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GDM: more diabetes, more good or more harm?
In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not "2-step" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parents', Families', Communities' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Care Following Neonatal Death in Healthcare Facilities in LMICs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. Birth Outcomes After Pertussis and Influenza Diagnosed in Pregnancy: A Retrospective, Population-Based Study. Maternal Lipids in Pregnancy and Later Life Dyslipidemia: The POUCHmoms Longitudinal Cohort Study. Unpacking the Complex Relationship Between Postpartum Haemorrhage and Cardiovascular Disease A Comment on Green Top Guideline No. 31: Investigating and Care in the Small-For-Gestational-Age and Growth Restricted Foetus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1