{"title":"GDM:糖尿病越多,好还是坏?","authors":"R. Silver","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.15998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not \"2-step\" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GDM: more diabetes, more good or more harm?\",\"authors\":\"R. Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.15998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not \\\"2-step\\\" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not "2-step" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.