{"title":"科学政策目标背景下的出版活动:文献计量学分析","authors":"I. N. Trofimova","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-59-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science today is the key factor of social development and focus of the government policy. The published and globally acknowledged research results reflect the advance of the national science. The author assesses the publication activity of Russian scientists within the context of the goals of the national sci-tech policy. The newness and originality of the study lies in revealing and analyzing of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of publication activity. The author applied the method of comparing bibliometric indicators to characterize the works by Russian scientists in Scopus database. The goals of the study are: 1) to analyze publication activity structure and dynamics; 2) to define publication impact; and 3) to evaluate competitive strength and potential of publication activity of Russian scientists as compared to foreign researchers. Based on the bibliometric indicators, the author reveals heterodromous trends in Russian science. Traditionally, Russian science maintains its positions in the share of publications in leading journals, with the fast developing life sciences increasing the total number of publications; while the multidisciplinary studies make the most promising vector. The author concludes that despite increasing number of publications and their impact, their contribution to the global science continues to be a relevant problem.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publication activities within the context of scientific policy goals: The bibliometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"I. N. Trofimova\",\"doi\":\"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-59-79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science today is the key factor of social development and focus of the government policy. The published and globally acknowledged research results reflect the advance of the national science. The author assesses the publication activity of Russian scientists within the context of the goals of the national sci-tech policy. The newness and originality of the study lies in revealing and analyzing of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of publication activity. The author applied the method of comparing bibliometric indicators to characterize the works by Russian scientists in Scopus database. The goals of the study are: 1) to analyze publication activity structure and dynamics; 2) to define publication impact; and 3) to evaluate competitive strength and potential of publication activity of Russian scientists as compared to foreign researchers. Based on the bibliometric indicators, the author reveals heterodromous trends in Russian science. Traditionally, Russian science maintains its positions in the share of publications in leading journals, with the fast developing life sciences increasing the total number of publications; while the multidisciplinary studies make the most promising vector. The author concludes that despite increasing number of publications and their impact, their contribution to the global science continues to be a relevant problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-59-79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-59-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Publication activities within the context of scientific policy goals: The bibliometric analysis
Science today is the key factor of social development and focus of the government policy. The published and globally acknowledged research results reflect the advance of the national science. The author assesses the publication activity of Russian scientists within the context of the goals of the national sci-tech policy. The newness and originality of the study lies in revealing and analyzing of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of publication activity. The author applied the method of comparing bibliometric indicators to characterize the works by Russian scientists in Scopus database. The goals of the study are: 1) to analyze publication activity structure and dynamics; 2) to define publication impact; and 3) to evaluate competitive strength and potential of publication activity of Russian scientists as compared to foreign researchers. Based on the bibliometric indicators, the author reveals heterodromous trends in Russian science. Traditionally, Russian science maintains its positions in the share of publications in leading journals, with the fast developing life sciences increasing the total number of publications; while the multidisciplinary studies make the most promising vector. The author concludes that despite increasing number of publications and their impact, their contribution to the global science continues to be a relevant problem.