评价agv和amr导航和避障能力的标准试验方法

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI:10.1520/ssms20190028
Adam Norton, Peter Gavriel, H. Yanco
{"title":"评价agv和amr导航和避障能力的标准试验方法","authors":"Adam Norton, Peter Gavriel, H. Yanco","doi":"10.1520/ssms20190028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adam Norton1, Peter Gavriel1, and Holly Yanco1 ABSTRACT Automatic guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are now ubiquitous in industrial manufacturing environments. These systems all must possess a similar set of core capabilities, including navigation, obstacle avoidance, and localization. However, there are few standard methods to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these systems in a way that is comparable. In this paper, a standard test method is presented that can be used to evaluate these capabilities and can be easily scaled and augmented according to the characteristics of the system under test. The test method can be configured in a variety of ways to exercise different capabilities, all using a common test apparatus to ease test set up and increase versatility. For each test configuration, conditions are specified with respect to the a priori knowledge provided to the system (e.g., boundary and/or obstacle locations) and the obstacles in the environment. Robustness of system capabilities is evaluated by purposefully introducing misalignment between the characteristics of the physical and virtual environment (e.g., providing representations of obstacles in the system’s map when they are not physically present). Example test performance data from an AMR is provided. The goal of this work is to provide a common method to characterize the performance of mobile systems in industrial environments that is easily comparable and communicated for both commercial and developmental purposes. This work is driven by existing","PeriodicalId":51957,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems","volume":"296 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Standard Test Method for Evaluating Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance Capabilities of AGVs and AMRs\",\"authors\":\"Adam Norton, Peter Gavriel, H. Yanco\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/ssms20190028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adam Norton1, Peter Gavriel1, and Holly Yanco1 ABSTRACT Automatic guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are now ubiquitous in industrial manufacturing environments. These systems all must possess a similar set of core capabilities, including navigation, obstacle avoidance, and localization. However, there are few standard methods to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these systems in a way that is comparable. In this paper, a standard test method is presented that can be used to evaluate these capabilities and can be easily scaled and augmented according to the characteristics of the system under test. The test method can be configured in a variety of ways to exercise different capabilities, all using a common test apparatus to ease test set up and increase versatility. For each test configuration, conditions are specified with respect to the a priori knowledge provided to the system (e.g., boundary and/or obstacle locations) and the obstacles in the environment. Robustness of system capabilities is evaluated by purposefully introducing misalignment between the characteristics of the physical and virtual environment (e.g., providing representations of obstacles in the system’s map when they are not physically present). Example test performance data from an AMR is provided. The goal of this work is to provide a common method to characterize the performance of mobile systems in industrial environments that is easily comparable and communicated for both commercial and developmental purposes. This work is driven by existing\",\"PeriodicalId\":51957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/ssms20190028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/ssms20190028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

自动导引车(agv)和自主移动机器人(amr)现在在工业制造环境中无处不在。这些系统都必须拥有一套类似的核心能力,包括导航、避障和定位。然而,很少有标准的方法可以比较地评估这些系统的能力和局限性。在本文中,提出了一种标准的测试方法,可以用来评估这些能力,并且可以根据被测系统的特性很容易地扩展和扩展。测试方法可以通过多种方式配置来锻炼不同的能力,所有这些都使用一个通用的测试设备来简化测试设置并增加通用性。对于每个测试配置,根据提供给系统的先验知识(例如,边界和/或障碍物位置)和环境中的障碍物指定条件。系统功能的稳健性是通过有目的地引入物理和虚拟环境特征之间的不一致来评估的(例如,在系统地图中提供障碍物的表示,当它们不存在时)。提供了来自AMR的示例测试性能数据。这项工作的目标是提供一种通用的方法来表征工业环境中移动系统的性能,这种方法易于比较和沟通,用于商业和开发目的。这项工作是由现有的驱动的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Standard Test Method for Evaluating Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance Capabilities of AGVs and AMRs
Adam Norton1, Peter Gavriel1, and Holly Yanco1 ABSTRACT Automatic guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are now ubiquitous in industrial manufacturing environments. These systems all must possess a similar set of core capabilities, including navigation, obstacle avoidance, and localization. However, there are few standard methods to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these systems in a way that is comparable. In this paper, a standard test method is presented that can be used to evaluate these capabilities and can be easily scaled and augmented according to the characteristics of the system under test. The test method can be configured in a variety of ways to exercise different capabilities, all using a common test apparatus to ease test set up and increase versatility. For each test configuration, conditions are specified with respect to the a priori knowledge provided to the system (e.g., boundary and/or obstacle locations) and the obstacles in the environment. Robustness of system capabilities is evaluated by purposefully introducing misalignment between the characteristics of the physical and virtual environment (e.g., providing representations of obstacles in the system’s map when they are not physically present). Example test performance data from an AMR is provided. The goal of this work is to provide a common method to characterize the performance of mobile systems in industrial environments that is easily comparable and communicated for both commercial and developmental purposes. This work is driven by existing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems
Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Study on the deformation capacity of multi-material 4D-printed LCE actuators Effect of laser energy density on transformation behavior and mechanical property of NiTi alloys fabricated by laser powder bed fusion Smart Manufacturing Implementation of a Continuous Downstream Precipitation and Filtration Process for Antibody Purification Fabrication of thin-walled hat-shaped beams from ultrahigh strength steel by laser-assisted robotic roller forming Tailoring the microstructure, martensitic transformation temperature and mechanical properties of 4D printed NiTi alloys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1