在更好地理解服务频率估值方面取得进展:研究列车服务频率和车内时间的相对估值如何随旅客特征而变化

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS International Journal of Transport Economics Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI:10.1400/220029
J. Holmgren, Pernilla Ivehammar
{"title":"在更好地理解服务频率估值方面取得进展:研究列车服务频率和车内时间的相对估值如何随旅客特征而变化","authors":"J. Holmgren, Pernilla Ivehammar","doi":"10.1400/220029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On-going urbanization has led to greater distances between homes and workplaces and more long-distance commuting, increasing the need for efficient inter-urban transport infrastructure. For sustainability, trains are preferred to private cars. Two key variables affecting door-to-door train travel time are in-vehicle time (IVT) and headway ; however, there is often a trade-off between speed and frequency in a system. If different categories of travellers value IVT and headway differently, their proportions on a route should affect traffic planning. Optimal system design might differ between routes carrying many commuters and routes carrying mainly passengers on single private or business trips. Knowledge of differences in relative valuations of headway versus IVT should therefore affect railway system design. We investigate whether the relative values of headway versus IVT differ between inter- urban commuting by train and single inter-urban trips by train, whilst also examining differences between socioeconomic groups. Stated choice (SC) data from 580 Swedish respondents are used in estimation. Individuals actually commuting and individuals not commuting but imagining that they are when answering the SC questions are asked about their preferences for headway versus IVT. Commuters are estimated to value increased headway 19 percentage points more than do non-commuters. Young people (under age 21 years) value headway more than do older people while people with children value headway less than do the childless.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"109-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making headway towards a better understanding of service frequency valuations : a study of how the relative valuation of train service frequency and in-vehicle time vary with traveller characteristics\",\"authors\":\"J. Holmgren, Pernilla Ivehammar\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/220029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On-going urbanization has led to greater distances between homes and workplaces and more long-distance commuting, increasing the need for efficient inter-urban transport infrastructure. For sustainability, trains are preferred to private cars. Two key variables affecting door-to-door train travel time are in-vehicle time (IVT) and headway ; however, there is often a trade-off between speed and frequency in a system. If different categories of travellers value IVT and headway differently, their proportions on a route should affect traffic planning. Optimal system design might differ between routes carrying many commuters and routes carrying mainly passengers on single private or business trips. Knowledge of differences in relative valuations of headway versus IVT should therefore affect railway system design. We investigate whether the relative values of headway versus IVT differ between inter- urban commuting by train and single inter-urban trips by train, whilst also examining differences between socioeconomic groups. Stated choice (SC) data from 580 Swedish respondents are used in estimation. Individuals actually commuting and individuals not commuting but imagining that they are when answering the SC questions are asked about their preferences for headway versus IVT. Commuters are estimated to value increased headway 19 percentage points more than do non-commuters. Young people (under age 21 years) value headway more than do older people while people with children value headway less than do the childless.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"109-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/220029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/220029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

持续的城市化导致家庭和工作场所之间的距离更远,以及更多的长途通勤,增加了对高效城市间交通基础设施的需求。为了可持续发展,火车比私家车更受欢迎。影响门到门列车行驶时间的两个关键变量是车内时间(IVT)和车头距;然而,在系统中,速度和频率之间往往存在权衡。如果不同类别的旅客对IVT和车头时距的评价不同,他们在一条路线上的比例就会影响交通规划。最优的系统设计可能在运载许多通勤者的路线和运载主要乘客的单一私人或商务旅行路线之间有所不同。因此,了解车头距与IVT相对估值的差异应该影响铁路系统的设计。我们调查了城市间火车通勤和单次城市间火车旅行之间车头距与IVT的相对值是否存在差异,同时也研究了社会经济群体之间的差异。来自580名瑞典受访者的陈述选择(SC)数据用于估计。在回答SC问题时,实际通勤的人和想象自己不通勤的人被问及他们对车头行驶和IVT的偏好。据估计,通勤者比不通勤者更看重车头时距增加19个百分点。年轻人(21岁以下)比老年人更重视进步,而有孩子的人比没有孩子的人更重视进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making headway towards a better understanding of service frequency valuations : a study of how the relative valuation of train service frequency and in-vehicle time vary with traveller characteristics
On-going urbanization has led to greater distances between homes and workplaces and more long-distance commuting, increasing the need for efficient inter-urban transport infrastructure. For sustainability, trains are preferred to private cars. Two key variables affecting door-to-door train travel time are in-vehicle time (IVT) and headway ; however, there is often a trade-off between speed and frequency in a system. If different categories of travellers value IVT and headway differently, their proportions on a route should affect traffic planning. Optimal system design might differ between routes carrying many commuters and routes carrying mainly passengers on single private or business trips. Knowledge of differences in relative valuations of headway versus IVT should therefore affect railway system design. We investigate whether the relative values of headway versus IVT differ between inter- urban commuting by train and single inter-urban trips by train, whilst also examining differences between socioeconomic groups. Stated choice (SC) data from 580 Swedish respondents are used in estimation. Individuals actually commuting and individuals not commuting but imagining that they are when answering the SC questions are asked about their preferences for headway versus IVT. Commuters are estimated to value increased headway 19 percentage points more than do non-commuters. Young people (under age 21 years) value headway more than do older people while people with children value headway less than do the childless.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
E-Commerce and the Last Mile in Urban Goods Distribution: Criticalities and the Need for Change Can process and lean thinking optimize order picking performance Combined optimization methodology for operational planning and service policies: a case study of urban ropeway transport An Analysis of Inverse of Airport Choice Leakage in China Multi-Airport Regions Statistical analysis of Texas state highways' cost indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1