贝弗利·史密斯的《混乱笔记》:同性恋进步叙事中女同性恋女权主义扫兴者的情感政治

Wendy Mallette
{"title":"贝弗利·史密斯的《混乱笔记》:同性恋进步叙事中女同性恋女权主义扫兴者的情感政治","authors":"Wendy Mallette","doi":"10.1353/wsq.2022.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article theorizes the lesbian feminist killjoy’s negativity in order to elucidate the temporal, affective, and redemptive politics found within feminist and queer collective memory by bringing Conditions: Five and Beverly Smith’s “The Wedding” into conversation with Lisa Duggan and Nan Hunter’s Sex Wars. I show how progress narratives presume the unattractiveness of lesbian feminism while investing queerness with the capacity to overcome lesbian feminism’s racial and class exclusions. To counter the way progress narratives’ division between good and bad subjects endows contemporary scholarship with a fantasy of innocence, I consider how the lesbian feminist killjoy might be attractive enough to provoke alternative desires.","PeriodicalId":23857,"journal":{"name":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","volume":"30 1","pages":"250 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beverly Smith’s “Notes on This Mess”: The Affective Politics of the Lesbian Feminist Killjoy in Queer Progress Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Mallette\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wsq.2022.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article theorizes the lesbian feminist killjoy’s negativity in order to elucidate the temporal, affective, and redemptive politics found within feminist and queer collective memory by bringing Conditions: Five and Beverly Smith’s “The Wedding” into conversation with Lisa Duggan and Nan Hunter’s Sex Wars. I show how progress narratives presume the unattractiveness of lesbian feminism while investing queerness with the capacity to overcome lesbian feminism’s racial and class exclusions. To counter the way progress narratives’ division between good and bad subjects endows contemporary scholarship with a fantasy of innocence, I consider how the lesbian feminist killjoy might be attractive enough to provoke alternative desires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"250 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2022.0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2022.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文通过将《条件:五》和贝弗利·史密斯的《婚礼》与丽莎·达根和南·亨特的《性战争》进行对话,将女同性恋女权主义者的消极性理论化,以阐明女权主义者和酷儿集体记忆中的时间政治、情感政治和救赎政治。我展示了进步叙事是如何假设女同性恋女权主义的不吸引力,同时赋予酷儿身份以克服女同性恋女权主义的种族和阶级排斥的能力。为了反驳进步叙事对好与坏主题的区分,赋予当代学术一种天真的幻想,我考虑了女同性恋女权主义者的扫兴者可能有多大的吸引力,足以激起不同的欲望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beverly Smith’s “Notes on This Mess”: The Affective Politics of the Lesbian Feminist Killjoy in Queer Progress Narratives
Abstract:This article theorizes the lesbian feminist killjoy’s negativity in order to elucidate the temporal, affective, and redemptive politics found within feminist and queer collective memory by bringing Conditions: Five and Beverly Smith’s “The Wedding” into conversation with Lisa Duggan and Nan Hunter’s Sex Wars. I show how progress narratives presume the unattractiveness of lesbian feminism while investing queerness with the capacity to overcome lesbian feminism’s racial and class exclusions. To counter the way progress narratives’ division between good and bad subjects endows contemporary scholarship with a fantasy of innocence, I consider how the lesbian feminist killjoy might be attractive enough to provoke alternative desires.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Education "in the Belly of the Monster": The Third World Women's Alliance's "Tuesday Schedule" Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment "We Wanted to Talk Plumbing": Organizing and Mutual Aid in Baltimore's High-Rise Public Housing Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance Selections from Triple Jeopardy 1, no. 1 (September-October 1971)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1