来自18种被子植物的线粒体基因填补了开花植物早期多样化系统基因组推断的采样空白

J. Xue, S. Dong, Ming‐Qiang Wang, Tianqiang Song, G. Zhou, Zhen Li, Y. Van de Peer, Zhu-Qing Shao, Wen Wang, Min Chen, Yan-mei Zhang, Xiaoqin Sun, Hongfeng Chen, Yongxia Zhang, Shouzhou Zhang, Fei Chen, Liangsheng Zhang, C. Cox, Yang Liu, Qiang Wang, Y. Hang
{"title":"来自18种被子植物的线粒体基因填补了开花植物早期多样化系统基因组推断的采样空白","authors":"J. Xue, S. Dong, Ming‐Qiang Wang, Tianqiang Song, G. Zhou, Zhen Li, Y. Van de Peer, Zhu-Qing Shao, Wen Wang, Min Chen, Yan-mei Zhang, Xiaoqin Sun, Hongfeng Chen, Yongxia Zhang, Shouzhou Zhang, Fei Chen, Liangsheng Zhang, C. Cox, Yang Liu, Qiang Wang, Y. Hang","doi":"10.1111/jse.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early diversification of angiosperms is thought to have been a rapid process, which may complicate phylogenetic analyses of early angiosperm relationships. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic studies have raised several conflicting hypotheses regarding overall angiosperm phylogeny, but mitochondrial genomes have been largely ignored as a relevant source of information. Here we sequenced mitochondrial genomes from 18 angiosperms to fill taxon‐sampling gaps in Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales, and major lineages of eudicots and monocots. We assembled a data matrix of 38 mitochondrial genes from 107 taxa to assess how well mitochondrial genomic data address current uncertainties in angiosperm relationships. Although we recovered conflicting phylogenies based on different data sets and analytical methods, we also observed congruence regarding deep relationships of several major angiosperm lineages: Chloranthales were always inferred to be the sister group of Ceratophyllales, Austrobaileyales to mesangiosperms, and the unplaced Dilleniales was consistently resolved as the sister to superasterids. Substitutional saturation, GC compositional heterogeneity, and codon‐usage bias are possible reasons for the noise/conflict that may impact phylogenetic reconstruction; and angiosperm mitochondrial genes may not be substantially affected by these factors. The third codon positions of the mitochondrial genes appear to contain more parsimony‐informative sites than the first and second codon positions, and therefore produced better resolved phylogenetic relationships with generally strong support. The relationships among these major lineages remain incompletely resolved, perhaps as a result of the rapidity of early radiations. Nevertheless, data from mitochondrial genomes provide additional evidence and alternative hypotheses for exploring the early evolution and diversification of the angiosperms.","PeriodicalId":101317,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitochondrial genes from 18 angiosperms fill sampling gaps for phylogenomic inferences of the early diversification of flowering plants\",\"authors\":\"J. Xue, S. Dong, Ming‐Qiang Wang, Tianqiang Song, G. Zhou, Zhen Li, Y. Van de Peer, Zhu-Qing Shao, Wen Wang, Min Chen, Yan-mei Zhang, Xiaoqin Sun, Hongfeng Chen, Yongxia Zhang, Shouzhou Zhang, Fei Chen, Liangsheng Zhang, C. Cox, Yang Liu, Qiang Wang, Y. Hang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jse.12708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The early diversification of angiosperms is thought to have been a rapid process, which may complicate phylogenetic analyses of early angiosperm relationships. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic studies have raised several conflicting hypotheses regarding overall angiosperm phylogeny, but mitochondrial genomes have been largely ignored as a relevant source of information. Here we sequenced mitochondrial genomes from 18 angiosperms to fill taxon‐sampling gaps in Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales, and major lineages of eudicots and monocots. We assembled a data matrix of 38 mitochondrial genes from 107 taxa to assess how well mitochondrial genomic data address current uncertainties in angiosperm relationships. Although we recovered conflicting phylogenies based on different data sets and analytical methods, we also observed congruence regarding deep relationships of several major angiosperm lineages: Chloranthales were always inferred to be the sister group of Ceratophyllales, Austrobaileyales to mesangiosperms, and the unplaced Dilleniales was consistently resolved as the sister to superasterids. Substitutional saturation, GC compositional heterogeneity, and codon‐usage bias are possible reasons for the noise/conflict that may impact phylogenetic reconstruction; and angiosperm mitochondrial genes may not be substantially affected by these factors. The third codon positions of the mitochondrial genes appear to contain more parsimony‐informative sites than the first and second codon positions, and therefore produced better resolved phylogenetic relationships with generally strong support. The relationships among these major lineages remain incompletely resolved, perhaps as a result of the rapidity of early radiations. Nevertheless, data from mitochondrial genomes provide additional evidence and alternative hypotheses for exploring the early evolution and diversification of the angiosperms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

被子植物的早期多样化被认为是一个快速的过程,这可能使早期被子植物关系的系统发育分析复杂化。质体和核系统基因组学研究已经提出了几个相互矛盾的关于被子植物系统发育的假设,但线粒体基因组作为相关的信息来源在很大程度上被忽视了。本文对18种被子植物的线粒体基因组进行了测序,填补了Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales以及主要的单子科和单子科谱系的分类单元采样空白。我们收集了来自107个类群的38个线粒体基因的数据矩阵,以评估线粒体基因组数据如何很好地解决当前被子植物关系中的不确定性。虽然我们根据不同的数据集和分析方法恢复了相互矛盾的系统发育,但我们也观察到几个主要被子植物谱系的深层关系是一致的:Chloranthales总是被推断为Ceratophyllales的姐妹类群,austrrobaileyales是mes被子植物的姐妹类群,而未被放置的Dilleniales一直被认为是超asterids的姐妹类群。取代饱和、GC组成异质性和密码子使用偏差是可能影响系统发育重建的噪声/冲突的可能原因;而被子植物的线粒体基因可能不会受到这些因素的实质性影响。线粒体基因的第三个密码子位置似乎比第一和第二个密码子位置包含更多的简约性信息位点,因此产生了更好的解决系统发育关系,通常具有强大的支持。这些主要谱系之间的关系仍然没有完全解决,也许是由于早期辐射的迅速。然而,来自线粒体基因组的数据为探索被子植物的早期进化和多样化提供了额外的证据和替代假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mitochondrial genes from 18 angiosperms fill sampling gaps for phylogenomic inferences of the early diversification of flowering plants
The early diversification of angiosperms is thought to have been a rapid process, which may complicate phylogenetic analyses of early angiosperm relationships. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic studies have raised several conflicting hypotheses regarding overall angiosperm phylogeny, but mitochondrial genomes have been largely ignored as a relevant source of information. Here we sequenced mitochondrial genomes from 18 angiosperms to fill taxon‐sampling gaps in Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales, and major lineages of eudicots and monocots. We assembled a data matrix of 38 mitochondrial genes from 107 taxa to assess how well mitochondrial genomic data address current uncertainties in angiosperm relationships. Although we recovered conflicting phylogenies based on different data sets and analytical methods, we also observed congruence regarding deep relationships of several major angiosperm lineages: Chloranthales were always inferred to be the sister group of Ceratophyllales, Austrobaileyales to mesangiosperms, and the unplaced Dilleniales was consistently resolved as the sister to superasterids. Substitutional saturation, GC compositional heterogeneity, and codon‐usage bias are possible reasons for the noise/conflict that may impact phylogenetic reconstruction; and angiosperm mitochondrial genes may not be substantially affected by these factors. The third codon positions of the mitochondrial genes appear to contain more parsimony‐informative sites than the first and second codon positions, and therefore produced better resolved phylogenetic relationships with generally strong support. The relationships among these major lineages remain incompletely resolved, perhaps as a result of the rapidity of early radiations. Nevertheless, data from mitochondrial genomes provide additional evidence and alternative hypotheses for exploring the early evolution and diversification of the angiosperms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slowing taxon cycle can explain biodiversity patterns on islands: Insights into the biogeography of the tropical South Pacific from molecular data Almost half of the Gymnura van Hasselt, 1823 species are unknown: Phylogeographic inference as scissors for cutting the hidden Gordian knot and clarify their conservation status The genetic diversity in the ancient human population of Upper Xiajiadian culture A test of island plant syndromes using resource‐use traits First buckthorn (Rhamnaceae) fossil flowers from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1